Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - PB the Deplorable

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 597
1
Radio and Podcasts / Re: George Knapp
« on: Today at 09:47:44 PM »
Sooo to avoid all that unpleasantness, all Whitley had to do was be on the lookout for owls?

2
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Today at 09:46:12 PM »
They didn’t register as agents of a foreign government.  Of course we always observe such niceties when we attempt to influence elections in foreign countries.  And it’s not like the Soviets attempted to influence elections/politics before and during the Cold War or anything without the benefit of Facebook.

The indictments are futile gesture that come just before Mueller is scheduled to submit a budget request.   

Isn't registering as agents of foreign governments for people and law firms in DC lobbying Congress on behalf of those governments?

It can't be that every non-citizen with a political opinion is in violation, could it?  Is that what it says in the First Amendment?  Is it even what it says in whatever law governs agents of foreign governments?

Because if it is, we need to arrest every non-citizen - legal and illegal - protesting, writing, or speaking on behalf of illegal aliens.  For starters. 

Their presence greatly benefits their home countries, and many of their home countries encourage them to come here.  The Mexican government supports Reconquista.  How is this not in violation of this apparently oh so serious law?

3
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Today at 09:30:38 PM »
Here's an article about the use of ''alt right propaganda'' to go after Franken-groper. 

The article starts off stating the people behind the operation are ''white nationalist provocateurs'', whatever that means, and ''fake news sites'', again whatever that means - certainly considering what the main stream media has turned into. 

This post isn't about the people behind the attacks on Franken, it's about saying I'm all for this type of attack on Liberal-''Progressive'' political figures, because this is the sort of smear campaign they and their accomplices in the media have been conducting for decades.  I believe in fighting back, instead of always taking the ''high road'' and always being on the defensive. 

Until these jackasses are routinely on the receiving end of the poison they've pumped into the system, nothing is going to change - and that's not tolerable.  It's also another reason Real America cheers Trump when he gives it back to them.  Fuck that asshole Al Franken, let's take some more of them down.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-social-media-psy-op-that-took-down-al-franken/ar-BBJjJpC?ocid=ASUDHP   

4
Didn't someone send him some cat food last time, which he clamed the cats didn't like - so he re-sold it?

5
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Today at 07:33:12 PM »
He could never have gotten a TS/SCI clearance as a private citizen. His drug use, his trip to Pakistan in 1981, association with Ayers/Dohrn and use of multiple SS numbers would have kept him out of any job requiring a code word clearance. Talking about security risks.

Well, he ok'ed the sale of 20% of our uranium supply to (gasp!) Russia.  Enriching the Clintons, and who know who else.

And he illegally undid decades of diplomatic work in putting together an embargo on Iran, which was put in place to reign in their nuclear and ICBM weapons programs.

I'll say he's a security risk.  He's also a traitor, and should be tried and executed, in my opinion, along with his co-conspirator Secretary of State at the time John Kerry.

6
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Today at 07:28:11 PM »
No, all this means is that it doesn't cost much to influence a bunch of low information, racist crackers to get their sorry asses out of bed and vote against their own interests.

Serious question.  I'm not in favor of foreigners getting involved in our elections, but it seems none of them - or anyone else really - have any qualms about it. 

So what did these people do beyond exercising their right to free speech?  It's not as if there isn't plenty of garbage put out there from all directions, what's so special about this?

7
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Today at 07:22:44 PM »
Where are you getting all of these bullshit talking points?  You fuckers see Mueller closing in on Trump and it's like your nuts are in a visegrip.  Not to worry.  It will be over soon enough.

You've been reduced to projecting.  Pretty much all your posts for the past, what, week or so?  Ever since even the fake news media reported Obama's felony spy operation.  I don't think even you sees Muller ''closing in'' anymore, but you're hoping.

This whole episode is about obstructing Trump's agenda.  Nothing more to it than that.  Obama started the contamination of our body politic, and his toadies decided to keep the party going.

8
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Today at 01:42:12 PM »
That’s the way it’s supposed to work. The difference is that high level officials in  DOJ, DOS, FBI and IRS covered up a multitude of Obama Administration crimes starting with Fast and Furious and ending with Obama’s illegal spying on Trump.  High level officials in some of those same organizations participated in the manufacture and promotion of false charges against Trump, most prominently Lynch, Comey and McCabe.  Obama ran the most corrupt administration in American history and he is lawyering up big time as we speak.

Only a lawyer would argue that this level of corruption is not illegal

9
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Today at 01:39:02 PM »
Please. Your post is just more specious claptrap.  The difference between Trump and Obama is that Trump is paying his own attorney’s fees and the taxpayers paid Obama’s

Obama used Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch as his personal attorneys and all around fixers.  In 2014 he hired Neil Eggleston as his new White House Counsel:

“Neil Eggleston Eggleston is the kind of guy you go to when someone tells you, “time to lawyer up.” He’s a veteran at cleaning up ethics messes for politicians, most notably Bill Clinton, whom he aided during the Whitewater probes and the Monica Lewinsky affair, double entendre intended.

But that’s not nearly all. He represented Rahm Emanuel during the scandal surrounding former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, as well as Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and George W. Bush political director Sara Taylor when scandals touched them, Clinton Cabinet members Federico Pena and Alexis Herman during corruption probes, and various business people involved in “complex criminal investigations” according to the New York Times.”

Maybe he hired him to take care of the dozens of unpaid parking tickets he received at Harvard

10
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Today at 12:02:28 PM »
Well, in eight years, the last guy never had to hire a lawyer.  You have our permission to leave.

And you're supposed to be a lawyer?  If so, you know good and well which laws he broke, where he went well beyond the powers of his office.  And not the speculative stuff, what he did out in the open thumbing his nose at us.

We had a media with no interest in doing anything but going along with whatever he wanted to do, whether it was within his Constitutional role or beyond it.  He inserted toadies like Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch, and their top aides at Justice, who not only covered for his illegal conduct but joined him in it.  Why would he need to hire  lawyer.  You failed to note he hired one after Hilary lost. 

11
Random Topics / Re: 2018 Winter Olympics PyeongChang
« on: Yesterday at 11:29:10 PM »
... Then they hired the anti-Trumper in hopes of increasing the plummeting ratings.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/winter-olympics-2018/2018/02/18/adam-rippon-work-nbc-correspondent-remainder-2018-winter-olympics/349145002/

A day later he decided he ''wanted to stay in the Olympic Village and support his teammates'', and turned the job down. 

LOL.  Sure, that's what happened. 

12
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 11:18:34 PM »
Not remotely true. Zero credibility with shit like that.

Obama spied on our allies, on the AP, on a Fox reporter who put out an unfavorable piece - and that's just who we know about.  The US government under Berock Obama listened in on our every phone call, saw every email, photographed every piece of mail - front and back, and followed our every move on the internet.

It's not a stretch to assume the FISA warrants are exactly what they appear to be.  Certainly given what was leaked and where it surely had to come from.  False applications intended to get approval for the warrants, then using them to spy on Trump campaign associates.  Completely in character for Obama and his toadies.  Occam's razor.

13
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 11:11:42 PM »
The only thing these RINO Republicans have going for them is they aren't Liberal ''Progressive'' Democrats.  They aren't supporting the fascist ''protest'' groups.  They haven't been covering for the Clinton crime family for the past 25 years, and they didn't give us the inept race-baiting America-hating Obama criminal regime.

14
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 11:11:05 PM »
Mueller is a Republican. Rosentstein and Comey are Republicans. The FBI is stacked with Republicans. The FISA court is stacked with Republicans. The DOJ is Republicans appointed by Trump.

How much can you sell out yourself and your country for this cheeto dicked reality TV lardass. What is wrong with you?

Crony-capitalist globalist Republicans.  The Republican ''leadership'' in DC have no principles - other than self interest - and represent no one.  These are not Reagan Republicans.  They hate the Tea Party Conservatives more than they oppose Big Government Democrats.  They aren't Libertarians, they certainly aren't Constitutional conservatives. 

And they hate Trump - I would have thought that was hard to miss.  So much for the theory everyone associated with the Rs somehow is going all out for Trump.  In DC it's just the opposite - he can't even get his agenda passed by the Republican held Senate.

15
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 08:11:34 PM »
The key phrase is Russians under indictment.  There may very well be others not yet indicted and Americans who colluded with them.  Let Mueller do his job.  When he's done he will tell you.  In the meantime, stop yammering facts not in evidence.  You're not Fox News...

Take your own advice, you're one who's been doing the speculating.

16
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 05:01:12 PM »
Your theories continue to be based on pure speculation and zero facts and you will continue to be proven wrong.  You haven’t cited one solitary piece of evidence or even remotely plausible grounds for suspecting that Trump colluded with the Russians or obstructed justice.  On the other hand there is overwhelming evidence that Obama, Hilliary and their devotees in DOJ, DOS and the FBI are guilty of both of those offenses and more.  I guess there is good reason for your having only one client and I’m sure that your mom has every confidence in you’re legal advice despite your muddled thinking.

If - big IF - he is a lawyer, he works for some wasteful government agency, that given the choice, most people would have shut down.

17
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 04:59:10 PM »
Once again, let me speak slowly, the thirteen indictments do not address collusion.  They address, and provide evidence for, Russian interference with our elections.  Why is this so difficult for you to comprehend?  You are correct that we have not seen evidence of collusion, but the investigation has not reached the stage for that to become public.  What we do know is that Russia interfered and Trump refuses to acknowledge it.

That's correct, they do not address collusion.  You are also correct, after a year and a half we have seen no evidence of collusion.  That's what objective folks have been saying the whole time. 

So you're what, agreeing with us and telling us we don't get it?  Idiot.

18
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 04:54:31 PM »
Comments such as that are but examples of why your name is so apt.  Let me explain.  I'll use small words.  The 13 indictments deal only with Russian attempts to influence our elections...

I try to use small words hoping the idiots can follow along.  I'm glad to hear you use a dictionary when reading.

Tell me, why is it ok for illegal aliens to come here, stage rallies in order to influence policy and elections, and even vote, but it's not ok for Russians (only Russians?) to put out their own comments meant to do the same?  Other than the illegal aliens are core Democrat supporters.

19
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 04:50:06 PM »
...  That leaves us with interference and Trump refusing to acknowledge it, must less do anything about it...

Well, the president at the time it was happening knew about it and did nothing.  That seems more serious than someone without the daily briefings not knowing about it.

Perhaps one reason Obama did nothing was he was too busy spying on the Trump campaign, and keeping Hilary out of jail for putting classified information at risk.   

20
Random Topics / Re: 2018 Winter Olympics PyeongChang
« on: Yesterday at 04:42:24 PM »
NBC... Then they hired the anti-Trumper in hopes of increasing the plummeting ratings...

Hi, we're the fake news media.  You wouldn't expect us to be stupid, but we are.

21
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 09:41:59 AM »
Cracker just got triggered by a Heinlein drop.

Even Pud figured out he's been had and has slunk away, embarrassed.  And that was even before Muller's ''big bust'' the other day.  The other schmucks fight on. 

Speaking of, where's Tiger Lilly?

22
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 09:31:28 AM »
You’re right.  He may be passing for black.  Whatever, he’s a racist asshole.

It doesn't really matter what he is.  If he's really a lawyer, just from reading his posts it's hard for me to believe someone this dumb could pass a law exam, but I suppose it's possible.  He's the same sort of uninformed idiot I deal with every day around here.  These folks generally fit into one of two categories - either willfully ignorant and repeating the mantra in order to be a member of the bubble in good standing, or an unrepentant America hater (you know, Antifa, BLM, Occupy, etc, and their supporters). 

You can see the level he's at in his bumper sticker mentality posts.  Within the bubble, all these people have to do is repeat the popular phrases they're given, and everyone else nods.  They actually think they are smarter than everyone else.  They get outside the bubble and they're completely lost, but it doesn't matter - they just know they're right, everyone they know agrees, even though they can't express why.  Any common sense they hear is just shrugged off.

23
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 01:47:31 AM »
... Coming from the guy who's never met a Clinton conspiracy he didn't believe...

Just so you know, I lived through the scandal-a-day Clinton regime.  I saw her sit in the Senate and accomplish nothing, saw her policy failures as Secretary of State, and know good and well what her tax exempt ''foundation'' was set up to do - funnel bribe money to her while she was the Secretary of State and later the presidential candidate of a major party.  Otherwise why would she shut it down the day after she lost, when that's when she would have all the time in the world to run her ''charitable foundation''?

No, I think I know Mr. and Mrs. Clinton quite well.


As far as ''sanctions'', why would Putin think Trump would remove them or not add to them?  Is that what's happened so far?  No, that is not what has happened during Trump's first year.  So much for that theory.

Mrs. Clinton, on the other hand, was party to handing over 20% of our uranium reserve.  A deal which no doubt included a generous ''donation'' to her ''foundation''.

You're as full of shit as that other asshole.

24
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 01:11:41 AM »
...   There is another class of blacks who together with their white fellow travelers encourage and promote this sense of victimhood in their less fortunate brethren because they benefit from it politically, financially and most importantly because it satisfies their lust for power and control...

Every single black Democrat politician, without exception.  Most of them are from either safe seats, or big cities under one party rule, and are thoroughly corrupt on top of everything else. 

Somehow these ''Progressive'' fascists are given a pass and thought of as ''helping'' their fellow blacks.  They are not.  They are suppressing their fellow blacks - handing out just enough from various welfare programs to keep them alive and voting Democrat.  They are the modern day equivalent of the Africans who sold the other Africans to slave traders.

25
Medicaid subscribers are not leeches.

I didn't say they were.  Those who paid into SS and Medicare their whole lives should get what they paid for.  No one has a problem with others who are truly in need getting help.

The leeches are a different story.  I'd say a useless person who sponged off his mother his entire adult life until she died, and since then set himself up with every handout available instead of making himself employable, getting a job, and supporting himself qualifies.

26
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 01:00:27 AM »
There is a class of black folks who cherish and perpetuate the plantation mentality because they lack the mental wherewithal, self discipline and/or initiative to prosper in society and want Massah to tell them what to do and provide for them.   There is another class of blacks who together with their white fellow travelers encourage and promote this sense of victimhood in their less fortunate brethren because they benefit from it politically, financially and most importantly because it satisfies their lust for power and control.  Dune Boy strikes me as one who may have gone from the former category to the latter and is desperately trying to convince himself that he hasn’t been mind fucked and sold his people down the river in the manner described in the below video...

You're just trying to harsh his buzz, since he's going to go see Black Panther and feel all empowered for a few hours.

27
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: Yesterday at 12:58:38 AM »
At this point, there's no proof Trump colluded with Russia. There is proof his campaign did though, with the Donald Jr. and Kushner's Trump Tower meeting with Russian officials ("If it's what you say it is, I love it!"), and we now know Trump and Hope Hicks drafted the lie to cover for that meeting, so that's kind of murky, legally speaking.

Sanctions. Putin is potentially the richest man in the world without them. What a dumb question.

Coming from the guy who's never met a Clinton conspiracy he didn't believe. Tell me about how Hillary ran a Satanic child sex slave ring in the basement of a pizza joint that didn't have a basement.

lol

lmao

Well, let's see.  I didn't even read about the pizza joint thing because it sounded ridiculous.  Too bad the supporters of the ''Progressive'' fascists aren't as discerning when their lies get passed around.

As far as the rest of your post, it adds up to a big fat zero.  Even if someone met with the Russians, even if it was to get dirt on Hilary, her zombies have already said it would be ''routine opposition research''.  That's how they described it when it turned out she actually did that very thing.

Try again?

28
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: February 17, 2018, 11:10:57 PM »
Well, you can't explain what it is Trump did to collude with the Russians, or what it is they would have needed him to do that they couldn't do for themselves - so how about explaining exactly what ''information'' was put out there that caused half the country to vote for Trump and against the harridan.

No?  Nothing?  Since all you are able to do is repeat baseless accusations, with no idea of any details or specifics, I'd say you are the one being played.  Since you really don't know what you're talking about, and have nothing but talking points, bumper sticker slogans, and internet memes to offer on any of it, I'd say you're the clueless tool.  Counselor.

29
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: February 17, 2018, 11:08:55 PM »
Folks, you should cut MD MD some slack.  He's just now realizing that he's been played and that he voted just as the Russians wanted him to.  A little commie he is.  The nest of  low information ilk herein offers nothing (other than Hillary rants) to refute the indictments. Russian intervened and stupid people, with the help of the likes of Fox News bought it.  Add the ongoing investigation to Trump's tepid response to the school shootings, pandering to the NRA, whoring and just being a dick, and the prospects for Democrats in the mid-terms are looking better and better.

How lame.  How stupid.  Your party ran a despicable, dishonest, incompetent, entitled, corrupt, detestable piece of garbage.  A person who rigged the primaries to shut out her opponent.  A person who cheated in the debates.  A person who was and is covering up serious illness.

And that's before the felonies; the self dealing; the lack of accomplishment; and her intent to continue the failed Obama foreign policies, to continue the failed Obama domestic policies, and to continue the Obama corruption, unethical behavior, and criminal conduct.

Even the other Democrats have distanced themselves from her, in an attempt to pretend they represent the middle class.  While struggling to pretend the tax cuts and the other Trump polices are somehow bad for this country.

News flash:  No one voted for Trump because anyone told us to - we voted for him because of his position on crime, immigration, the economy, controlling the border, negotiating trade policies that benefitted our country, appointing judges that follow the law instead of ''Progressive'' ideology, and so on. 

We like what he's done, and what he's doing. 

30
Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: February 17, 2018, 06:39:37 PM »
These Democrats, having invited violent criminal gangs to come here, are now protecting them and other criminals under the pretense of ''sanctuary'' cities.  And signing them up to vote

They figure the ones who vote will all vote Democrat, and half the people they kill will be Republicans, so they're perfectly fine having them and keeping them here.  The half they kill that are Ds are just expendable collateral damage.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 597