President Donald J. Trump

[aldousburbank]

Your mom's a whore and your country is a nation of feminized soyboys.

But your wimmenz are hhhot!

[albrecht]

Here's the deal.  Once Donny John federalizes the National Guard, the Guard is subject to the Act.  He has federalized them.

And like before when Democrats were ignoring Federal law and curtailing civil rights at Little Rock HS the President can use them to restore order. Also, the Insurrection Act (Marines were used in LA when the blacks were rioting and decades earlier various troops were used during black riots) and post 911 changes has changed Posse Comitatus Law, for good or bad.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-4986 :
"The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution. (2) PROCLAMATION TO DISPERSE. Section 334 of such title is amended by striking or those obstructing the enforcement of the laws after insurgents. (3) HEADING AMENDMENT.The heading"

Also we could use the broad semi-exception to  the 4th Amendment that Customs and Border Patrol has for 100 miles into the country to help round-up illegals, criminals, and terrorists.
https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/1084/~/legal-authority-for-the-border-patrol

[Dr. MD MD]

Styx is running for governor of Virginia. Vote no shirt!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-Q8t7K6Sas

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxfgUevMrYU

[Juan]

Virginia Vermont, what’s the difference.

[Dr. MD MD]

Virginia Vermont, what’s the difference.

They both start with V.

[analog kid]

Styx is running for governor of Virginia. Vote no shirt!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-Q8t7K6Sas

Is she running on an Anton LaVey platform?

[Dr. MD MD]

Is she running on an Anton LaVey platform?

No. Also, I know your standards are almost non-existent but that's a man.

[GravitySucks]

They both start with V.

That’s not the difference

[Dr. MD MD]

That’s not the difference

Similarity.

[analog kid]

No. Also, I know your standards are almost non-existent but that's a man.

Bullshit.

[Dr. MD MD]

Bullshit.

No, Hillary really lost the election. Accept it!

[analog kid]

No, Hillary really lost the election. Accept it!

No idea what that's supposed to mean.

[Dr. MD MD]

No idea what that's supposed to mean.

That's nothing new. Go back to sleep. The new world order is taking care of all your needs.

[paladin1991]

That's nothing new. Go back to sleep. The new world order is taking care of all your needs.

DisInfo Troll.

[Dr. MD MD]

DisInfo Troll.

Braindead, whiny faggot. Why don't you go SJW someone else for awhile or put me on ignore if I offend you so? Stupid bitch! :

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGBr2RK3s24

[starrmtn001]

https://youtu.be/YYW-gC3LHZk

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWV0ZG1a-6w

[Dr. MD MD]

Here's some more free hate speech:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_CM8GAqD-g

[PaulAtreides]

And like before when Democrats were ignoring Federal law and curtailing civil rights at Little Rock HS the President can use them to restore order. Also, the Insurrection Act (Marines were used in LA when the blacks were rioting and decades earlier various troops were used during black riots) and post 911 changes has changed Posse Comitatus Law, for good or bad.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-4986 :
"The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution. (2) PROCLAMATION TO DISPERSE. Section 334 of such title is amended by striking or those obstructing the enforcement of the laws after insurgents. (3) HEADING AMENDMENT.The heading"

Also we could use the broad semi-exception to  the 4th Amendment that Customs and Border Patrol has for 100 miles into the country to help round-up illegals, criminals, and terrorists.
https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/1084/~/legal-authority-for-the-border-patrol

Nope.  The Court would find these  "work arounds" to but mere  attempts  to circumvent the intent of the Act.  Judges don't like that.

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fhEquZIAq0

[Dr. MD MD]

Nope.  The Court would find these  "work arounds" to but mere  attempts  to circumvent the intent of the Act.  Judges don't like that.

Wouldn't it depend on the judge?

[ItsOver]

That's nothing new. Go back to sleep. The new world order is taking care of all your needs.

Heh, heh, heh.

[Kidnostad3]

 

And like before when Democrats were ignoring Federal law and curtailing civil rights at Little Rock HS the President can use them to restore order. Also, the Insurrection Act (Marines were used in LA when the blacks were rioting and decades earlier various troops were used during black riots) and post 911 changes has changed Posse Comitatus Law, for good or bad.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-4986 :
"The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution. (2) PROCLAMATION TO DISPERSE. Section 334 of such title is amended by striking or those obstructing the enforcement of the laws after insurgents. (3) HEADING AMENDMENT.The heading"

Also we could use the broad semi-exception to  the 4th Amendment that Customs and Border Patrol has for 100 miles into the country to help round-up illegals, criminals, and terrorists.
https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/1084/~/legal-authority-for-the-border-patrol

The "Big A" sure do know his shit don't he?

[ItsOver]

Wouldn't it depend on the judge?

Say, for example, a FISA judge?

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6VRIlvtN40

[albrecht]

Nope.  The Court would find these  "work arounds" to but mere  attempts  to circumvent the intent of the Act.  Judges don't like that.

The 9th might but the Court has already said it is legal and constitutional for 100 miles on the border:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1357#a_3
United States v. Montoya De Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985)
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976)

Wondering if you think it was illegal or unconstitutional when Federal agents, troops, and National Guard were used in places like Little Rock, Mississippi, etc over the decades when Democrats were rebelling or afterwards when Democrats were denying some people civil rights? Or in Watts or LA later? What about during the Civil War? Was the use of Federal military troops illegal?

ps: Trump should pull a Jackson and just tell certain Courts to pound sand on some of these political decisions, especially the 9th. "You go ahead and enforce it." As Jefferson, Democrat, said at some point it becomes ridiculous "absurdly sacrificing the ends to the means." If you don't have a border, you don't have a country.

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqPFEC9AiEE

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQQBs-wYQqE