Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - PB the Deplorable

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 589
Politics / Re: Race & I.Q.
« on: January 18, 2018, 11:14:50 PM »
why do most progressive liberals think there is zero correlation between the two? take black Africans as an example; all black African countries are shitholes (including South Africa). is it just a coincidence that black Africans have an average i.q. of 78? race is real. you may not care about it, but it cares about you.

ps: black Africans still sell their fellow blacks as slaves. thas rite! let that sink in.

But they're doing so where everywhere else

Falkie wants Norry to buy him a glass eye

Politics / Re: Political Trivia
« on: January 17, 2018, 01:43:21 AM »
Two people have represented their party on the presidential ballot a total of five times as either the presidential or vice-presidential nominee.  Not surprisingly, one of them is FDR.  Who is the other?

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 17, 2018, 12:20:06 AM »
As issued by the Whitehouse...How do we know? Because its unlikely the doctor qualified if he couldn't even spell his own name....The Trump circus can't even falsify statements convincingly.

Dr Ronnie is the answer to the riveting trivia question:  who is the only person to see both President Obama and President Trump naked?

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 16, 2018, 10:06:19 PM »
Now 136 owes me answers to four questions of my choosing

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 16, 2018, 09:54:01 PM »
... I also wonder about this (not that this is necessarily a contradiction, but I think it's fair to ask you to explain how you can believe both - and post them on the same day.  As per our agreement, you're not obligated to answer this.)

Like I said, you can't quite grasp the idea that our head of government is not a dictator.  Part of the brilliance of separation of powers is it doesn't matter what the president wants, his powers are limited.

but also

The president - any president - is the comander-in-chief, the top legislator (nothing goes into law without his signature), the top diplomat, the head of his party, the head of the government, the chief negotiater of treaties and trade agreements, the top police official, and etc.

Those are limited powers?

Yes, they are limited.  The President can't decree new law.  The Presidnet can't deem someone guilty of a crime and have them jailed.  The President can't sign a bill into law unless it's been passed by both chambers and sent to him.  He can't make judicial appointments or appoint policy making officials without Senate approval.  He can't agree to a treaty and have it become law without Senate approval.  He can't remove judges.  He can't remove members of Congress.  And so on. 

He's the top legislator, only because he has more power over what gets passed and signed into law than ony other single person.  He is the top police official, but only from a management and policy standpoint.  He's the head of the party, but that isn't a governmental function.

Much of what is referred to as ''separation of powers'' are actually shared powers.  Some with specific duties, others are more (intentionally) vague.  Yes, we need a strong leader - but not a dictator

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 16, 2018, 09:53:50 PM »
... 3.Because the Fake News Media played up the capping of the deduction of various state taxes, specifically property taxes and state income taxes.

Of course that's what the average person here who actually works and pays taxes is going to focus on - it's the narrative the pretend journalists have put out there.  So, duh, the House Republicans from Cali have to play politics on the issue.  The truth is, it's a good bill for everyone. 

Please show some calculations to back up your claim that the capping of the deductions isn't a real issue.  I think people can figure out for themselves (or with the help of an accountant) how their taxes will change and would be unlikely to fall for inaccurate media reports.  I'm aware that the capping of the deductions will mainly effect those with incomes of $100,000 or higher, however, since you clearly believe that cutting taxes for the wealthiest benefits everyone, please also explain then how the capping of these deductions can be 'good for everyone.'...

Well, again, you're looking at the one item the Fake News Media wants you to look at, rather than the total tax bill.  It's pretty clear everyone's taxes are going down, but one wouldn't know that from the media hysteria.  Although for some reason that's died down.  Probably because people have had a chance to run the numbers for their situation and realize the pretend reporters are full of it.  But hey, they got several news cycles of dishonest Trump bashing negativity out of it, and it's on to some other bullshit distraction like shithole countries.

What I'd like to know is why anyone should get any personal deductions.  If the idea of collecting taxes is to generate funds for the things we need government to do, why should how people spend their money, how many kids they have, etc, factor into it?

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 16, 2018, 09:53:08 PM »
... 2. Go look at population figures over the past couple of decades, and compare that to the growth in California state expenditures.  All those newer residents either work directly for government, or work in companies that supply them, feed them, report on their doings, etc.

Provide actual evidence for this claim about 'all those newer residents.'  I don't think that actually should be too hard.  However, it wouldn't involve looking over the growth in California state expenditures but in looking up the industries the people in Sacramento work for. If such information isn't available, you actually have zero evidence to back up your claim.  You could look over any city in California that has had population growth over the last couple decades and look at the growth in California expenditures and make a similar claim. As the line goes, correlation is not causation...

Yeah, I know.  Unless some ''study'' giving you a bunch of statistics, or the Fake News Media tell you something, you've completely unable to figure things out for yourself.  That's fine.  You're one of the people who, when told 7 of the 10 wealthiest counties in the US are those surrounding Washington DC wouldn't be able to explain why.

Sacramento is the home of the California State Government.  It's where most of the bureaucrats live and work.

From 1980 to the present, California State Government spending has grown from roughly $20 billion to $132 billion.  The population of the greater Sacramento area in that time has risen from under 1 million to 2.5 million.  If you don't think any of those new residents moved there for cushy state jobs, where is all that new spending going?

Trust me, no one is moving there for the ambiance.

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 16, 2018, 09:52:57 PM »
All three of these were replies to specific questions you were asked, and you dodged them by stating (not your direct words, but definitely the gist, and the way I phrase it here fits what I wrote earlier about the ways you dodge answering questions.):
1.If you're unaware of this, I can't help you.
2.Everybody already knows this, and I don't have to prove it.
3.The claims are 'fake news.'

1.I'm obviously talking about the unnecessary, burdensome laws.  If you're unaware any even exist, I'm not sure it's a good use of my time to run down a list for you.  All those companies that complain about them are probably lying.

Humor me anyway and list 10 of them...

There is an endless array of federal, state, and local laws, rules, fees, filing requirements, you name it.  That you'd better be aware of, or else.

For starters, all the various laws passed that supposedly benefit employees - ADA;  Minimum wage;  Family Leave.  These are all well meaning, and while the media reports on a couple key items, they run thousands of pages - and every employer had better be aware of what's in them.  It's exhaustive keeping up.

Then there's the expensive time wasting requirements that don't provide anyone with anything of value.  Sarbanes-Oxley.  All the new banking regulations.  SOX was implemented by a Congress that wanted to ''do something'' after Enron, et al.  Had SOX been in existence, it wouldn't have prevented a thing. 

The 2008 meltdown was a result of Andrew Cuoma at HUD removing credit requirements so ''poor people'' could buy houses, Goldman Sachs selling fraudulent sub-prime mortgage backed securities as AAA investments, and AIG selling SWAPS to investors that didn't own the underlying securities.  Instead of addressing that, they put more reporting requirements on banks.

Try selling goods in California.  Go take a look at the quarterly sales tax return.  There is a basic statewide rate that goes to the state government, then every county adds their own rate, which varies from country to county, and a good number of cities add whatever they've managed to pass onto it as well.  I don't recall, but I'm guessing water districts, fire districts, school districts, park districts, and who all ever else can tack on a bit as well.  The poor slob who owns a business with customers all over the state gets to try to determine how much to collect from who, keep a record of it, figure out how to fill out the form, and send it in. 

There are plenty of dumb environment laws, plenty of dumb safety laws, plenty of dumb laws affecting businesses in general.  Because it's one size fits all, and everyone has to comply, whether it makes sense for their business or not. 

There are inspections, forms to fill out, fees, deadlines, everything right down to the number of parking spaces in your parking lot, and who can park where. 

No one has time for this shit.  They are requirements that don't cost the legislators a thing - and they exempt themselves - but cost everyone else a ton of time, energy, and expense.  People get tired, and either leave the state or offshore the business.

That's enough to keep you busy, you get the idea.

Why would people subject themselves when they don't have to?

Ha-ha-ha. ;D You beat me to it. My thoughts exactly. We may hear something like this from "pittsburghstealer" himself:

"We talked about this for years. That when chefist went, I would get certain property. He has things I'd like to have. Like that trademark. And when he goes, I'll go over [to meet with his survivors] and give written advice."

Right, on. You nailed it. But I read Senda's Quora post stating that his "dear, longtime friend" Maroney held a $180,000 IRA when he retired at age 72. Then "went" at age 80. Perhaps the conniving Senda "wanted certain property" as some "close friend" -- that may have well involved "a piece" of what was left of Maroney's IRA savings. Perhaps. But in any matter, it's Senda being Senda: the selfish, inhuman, unfeeling vulture he was and always will be.
#SewergabStrong vs. #SendaNation

Falkie was counting on that IRA, and now that wife he didn't know about is going to get her hooks on it and not give Falkie a penny.  Plan B is to poke his eye out and sue the doctor

Politics / Re: #1 in poverty!! 1 out of 5 Californians Live in Poverty
« on: January 16, 2018, 08:47:59 PM »
We weren't impoverished until the Ds seized control and turned the place into a banana republic.

Gee, the Party leaders love Castro's Cuba and Hugo Chavez' Venezuela.  They strongly supported the Sandinistas and every other Left-wing Marxist revolutionary band of thugs in our hemisphere and elsewhere, while working to destroy this country.  Small wonder when they take power they turn those places into the shithole countries they admire - all our big cities and quite a few of our states.

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 16, 2018, 12:49:02 AM »
... What is far far more pressing is Trump's comments about the ICBM false alarm from Hawaii...

That's far more pressing to you than the constant injection of race into any and every political issue and discussion, by the Democrat Party?

It's far more pressing than the Ds and the Fake News Media turning every Trump comment into something ''racist''?

It's far more pressing than a continuation of the Democrat Party doing everything they can since the inception of the party to divide the country by race (and class, and gender, and everything else they can think of), for their own benefit?

In a few days, no one is even going to remember the false alarm in Hawaii, but we'll still be subject to the Democrats and their destructive divisivness.  Your priorities are way out of whack.

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 15, 2018, 05:46:16 PM »
If it turns out Trump didn't use the term shithole, that ''Little Dick'' Durbin just made it up in order to create more Democrat generated racial divisiveness and more irrational Trump hate, and the Fake News Media didn't care whether it was true or not and were more than happy to report it - will Pud and the other followers this time decide to stop believing everything the pretend reporters tell them, or will they just move on to the next fake story?

Just the fact that it was turned into something ''racist'' is a disgrace, something manufactured by the Party who has tried to divide the country along racial lines for it's own benefit almost since it's inception.  Race isn't what makes these countries shitholes, their governments are.  The ''White'' East Bloc countries were considered shitholes before escaping the ''Progressive'' Soviet Union, and joining the civilized free world.  Plenty of Asian, Latin American, and African countries are no longer considered shitholes - because they have governments that respect human rights, and the people's right to the fruits of their labor.

That's the Left for you though.  That's the Democrat Party.  That's the Fake News media.  They can't win by telling the truth, by competing in the arena of ideas.  They have to keep people poor and dependent.  They have to be this deceitful and destructive - or disappear as a political force.

Random Topics / Re: What a crazy year for baseball...
« on: January 15, 2018, 05:28:47 PM »
Oh boy!...

If they can get Steph Curry to lead off and play CF they'll be all set

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 15, 2018, 01:52:17 AM »
So what happens if I fucking leave my wallet at home? fuck!

You have a wallet?

People still watch football?

''This is White Crow''

Hadn't noticed the items?.. Geez . Start looking! George moves around his collection of collectables as backdrop props to represent the news story he is broadcasting.

I said I hadn't considered them affecting his credibility - I did not say I hadn't noticed them.

And I was joking.

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 05:55:36 PM »
She had three brothers, so can take care of herself. I think its only right that someone who is prepared to insult her to her face is aware of things. I'm reasonably confident though it won't happen, because the meth addicted insomniacs haven't the balls.  ;)

Since Shreddi brought it up, how much does she weigh?

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 05:51:25 PM »
Though I, actually, love it, pay no attention to the British types, fleers or not, when they criticize American food. The whole world, for centuries, make fun of theirs and they have imported ours, especially the cheap fastfood stuff, or stuff from "shithole" countries, like India, to a great degree. Though when you get "Indian" you are, really getting Paki, because, for the most part, Indians are vegetarians. But "back when" they had an empire so you just call it all "Indian" because it was prior to the civil war and partition that happened due to the British, leaving this time. And, actually, that stuff is good, especially when drunk. And also often can help "cleanse" your system, think of it like a transmission flush. Needed and beneficial sometimes.

I'm not sure what Shreddi was going on about.  When we run into women from his island, they are indistinguishable from the fat chicks here until they start talking

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 05:47:15 PM »

Ahh, the Trump playbook of 'fact'...Attribute unsubstantiated bullshit and say it happened.. (see, Chinese invented climate change, Trump denies he said he could grab women by the pussy--The list is long) So you can't find a quote where I threatened you? Basically, you're libeling me?

The way he goes on, Trump must remind Pud of his first husband

That the 38-second photo montage at the beginning of this video on such a serious topic opens with a photo of a joyous, happy-go-lucky Senda, and then goes straight into a pic of an alien head and stuffed animals in front of a shelf of "Dummies" books, costs Senda some credibility here, IMO.

You could be right about the effect on his credibility on this - I hadn't considered the items you mentioned.  Seems obvious in hindsight though.

Random Topics / Re: Google Adsense is finished on BellGab.
« on: January 14, 2018, 05:14:07 PM »
Sounds like the fat chicks I always end up in line with at the coffee shop.  I can get approved for a home mortgage in less time than one of them takes to order their special caffeine creation.

They are all fat, so could be the same ones

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 12:06:00 PM »
I was anti-American before it was cool. You all waddle around, fat arses dragging on the ground because of your all-burger diet and think you have something to teach the rest of the world...

For fuck's sake, it's not all burgers you limey bastard.  We've got pizza, chicken nuggets, tacos, burritos, Hershy bars, M&Ms, Coca-Cola, deep fried Twinkies, Reese's Pieces, french fries, garlic fries, milkshakes, sloppy joes, Starbucks, and all the rest.   

Don't you watch Falkies videos?  Jesus

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 12:01:54 PM »

Aw, you miss Swishy Pants, don't you?  No worries, I'm sure he'll be along soon

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 11:54:07 AM »
... I contribute more to the US economy than you do...

Pud is a Dreamer.  He is doing one of those jobs Americans don't want

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 11:22:45 AM »
So, you guys bust my chops for voting Obama instead of him but even he endorsed Barry. ;D

I'm just kidding, you've come around to recognize the Fake News bullshit.  Most people just go into denial and cling to what they've been doing, rather than admit they've been supporting the wrong party all those years

Very few lifelong Democrat supporters understand the party has been taken over by the ''Progressives'', and just continue going along with whatever they say and do

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 02:32:21 AM »
So you're talking about McLame?  I was talking about Trump.

I thought he was talking about Obama

Politics / Re: President Donald J. Trump
« on: January 14, 2018, 01:48:32 AM »

If you said that to her face, you wouldn't even see the punch going back for a second hit. I'd just finish my beer before she ripped your hair out. But we both know you're a coward and didn't donate (and have no intention of doing so) to the site...Oh, and you voted for Obama.

Is anyone else concerned about Pud?  At least once a week we hear these alarming descriptions of what his bride does to those who cross her.

Random Topics / Re: Google Adsense is finished on BellGab.
« on: January 13, 2018, 05:38:12 PM »
A few females have mentioned to me one way or other they don't want to participate anymore because of issues above. It's MV biz not my concern. I like his let it develope and change management style but also recognize that his style will offend some many.

I was in an office the other day and I overheard several women complaining about experiences from childhood.  They had each experienced wanting to join the boys when they were playing games, and were upset that while the boys allowed them to join, they were too rough, too competitive, etc.

So they wanted to join in and play, but change everything up to suit them

Oh how I wanted to join that conversation.  I continued working on my project and pretended not to hear it.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 589