BellGab.com Archive

How big a douche do you have to be - other than a Republican presidential candidate - to try to capitalize on the terrorist attacks in Paris?  Apparently a douche named Michael because in his blog today, he claims Meier predicted this in 1981.

Hi folks!  Long time no post, I'm in New York visiting family.  But, I had a NASA release of another of my Pluto animations today.  It's a 30-second animation "fly over" of the encounter hemisphere, showcasing all the images we got back last week.  The link has a post explaining it and a link (and embed) of the YouTube movie.

Quote from: SredniVashtar on August 24, 2015, 09:17:55 AM
A lot of (to slightly rework Michael's moving analogy) rocky mountain oysters, if you ask me.

And Mikey, WHY do you keep posting here.  NO ONE BELIEVES YOU.  NO ONE WILL BELIEVE YOU.  YOU BEHAVE LIKE AN ASS.  The fact that you keep posting here makes me think you really do like the abuse.  I suggest visiting some local S&M club, at least there you'll find someone who likes it too and you'll actually contribute something.

Quote from: MichaelHorn on August 23, 2015, 10:33:31 PM
Physicist and aerospace engineer David Froning (http://theyfly.com/Scientific_Experts.html) also said these remarks at one of my presentations on the Meier case:

"My colleagues and I may have made breakthroughs in our understanding of possibilities and ways for traveling faster than light from Billy Meier's accounts of his encounters with the Plejarens...If what this Meier is saying is just a hoax, he's being cued by some very knowledgeable scientists. I've only discussed this Meier case with scientists who are fairly open-minded about interstellar flight, but I'll tell you, the majority of them think it's credible and agree at least with part, or sometimes all, of the things talked about by the Plejarens."

Yeah, still waiting for this one, Horn.  You've been preaching that quote for years.  Where's my FTL drive?  Or even a breakthrough?  Maybe it's time you retire these ancient quotes in favour of ones that pan out.  Put up or shut up.

Quote from: chefist on August 23, 2015, 07:33:54 PM
Michael, I think you need some professional help.  I'm not joking or trying to be rude. Perhaps a therapist could help you with your clearly apparent issues with anger and paranoia.  If you know the posts on BG are negative, why do you continue to come back? It seems you would be better focusing on YouTube than here.

He reminds me of Dinish D'Souza, a classic narcissist with no recognition of how he appears to others.  Either that, or such a pathological asshole that he loves lying and making shit up and just seeing how far he can fling it, even when it's flung right back at him he pretends like he's not covered in filth.

Michael, your argument style is that of a 5 year old, and that's an insult to most 5 year olds.  It's juvenile.  You try to use big words in your not-veiled insults just to make them seem more meaningful and like you're smarter than everyone else.  You harass people who disagree with you to the point of saying that they DO agree with you if they happen to not respond to an e-mail challenge from you.  It's beyond disgusting.

The fact that you bill yourself (bill, literally) as a media representative for someone and something speaks volumes about that someone and something in and of itself, when compared with how you conduct yourself not only on other forums like this, but on your own blog.

You utterly fail to refute cogent arguments and criticisms of Meier's and your work and instead respond with insults rather than actually addressing the claims.

Problem for you is that you finally are on a forum where the people are willing to be just as juvenile and insulting as yourself.  This is despite your very clear statement several weeks ago that you would never post here again.  Yet here you are.  Maybe you like the abuse?  Hmm?  Is that it?  You like getting it as hard as you give it?

Quote from: mahigitam on August 21, 2015, 09:14:05 PM
I have no problem debating Michael Horn where the host is neutral or maintains healthy skepticism and most of all knows when the speaker is dodging the questions, insulting other, moving goal posts, committing red herring and straw man fallacies, etc.

Isn't it amazing that Michael Horn turned this into "Skeptic Refuses to Debate"?  One must wonder about the lengths to which Michael is willing to just flat-out LIE and spout utter bullshit about things to try to look good to the gaggle of goons and morons who follow him and harass people who don't drink from the golden nectar they believe flows from his many parts.