• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 11, 2011, 01:33:34 AM

Dr. MD MD

Oh, so she means dying in the sense that we're all dying, really...eventually.  ;) ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeUAMKoU_-k

What a horrible shill!  ::)

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on October 04, 2017, 09:07:55 PM
Oh, so she means dying in the sense that we're all dying, really...eventually...

So no one is actually dying.

After the last Democrat is defeated, and the party is disbanded, we need to keep a few around in zoos so we don't forget their destructiveness and divisiveness

Zetaspeak

Quote from: Lord Grantham on October 04, 2017, 08:06:39 PM
White House walks back Trump's Puerto Rico comments as Wall Street reels
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/04/trump-puerto-rico-debt-white-house-response-243452

On Wednesday, the Trump administration indicated it has no current plans to take the unprecedented, politically dangerous and probably illegal step of wiping out the owners of Puerto Rico's bonds


Trump's Puerto Rico drop-in was a monumental insult
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/353872-trumps-puerto-rico-drop-in-was-a-monumental-insult
Trump then visited a church and started throwing out rolls of paper towels like he was the star of a cheap halftime show shooting T-shirts at adoring fans. He also gave out flashlights but then yelled out, “But you all don’t need flashlights anymore do you!” in a clear attempt to highlight the “great work” he has done to bring the island back from disaster.

People DO need flashlights, however: Just 8.6 percent of the population has electricity. In addition, just 48 percent have access to drinking water. Trump was then taken to survey the affected areas and speak to disaster survivors about their needs â€" except he didn’t.


this part is especially interesting
Trump and the Republicans had better ensure that the Puerto Rico recovery happens quickly and normalcy returns to the island. If that doesn't occur, there will be a massive exodus of hundreds of thousands of American citizens who are immediately eligible to register and vote when they settle into states like Texas and Florida.

They come from an island where the voting participation rate is almost 100 percent. I don't think that will bode well for Trump or Republicans in 2018 or 2020.


The way he acted in Puerto Rico I really wish he did a line of coke on the plane before getting out, it would at least explain it.

Going there and blaming them for the "ruining the budget?" and playing Crocodile Dundee "This ain't a tragedy, now that was a tragedy"

The problem with Trump saying "Giving himself an A and everything going great in PR" is when at the same time he saying a mass shooting in LV with a record breaking death count and a 75 minute response time as "a miracle" the job local authorities did

When he hypes LV response as some miraculously perfect it's hard to take him serious about any other thing he claims he was doing great at.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on October 04, 2017, 09:17:05 PM
So no one is actually dying.

After the last Democrat is defeated, and the party is disbanded, we need to keep a few around in zoos so we don't forget their destructiveness and divisiveness

Well, to be fair 16 people did perish during the storm but no one since. She doesn't care. She's just going to keep hammering away at that same talking point, trying to foment panic in her community.  ::)

Kidnostad3

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on October 04, 2017, 09:17:05 PM
So no one is actually dying.

After the last Democrat is defeated, and the party is disbanded, we need to keep a few around in zoos so we don't forget their destructiveness and divisiveness

Nah, it would’t be fair to the zookeepers. They’d  just continue to do what they do bestâ€"hurl their shit.  Better we just stuff a few and put them on display in the Smithsonian.




albrecht

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 06, 2017, 10:13:57 PM
Trump approval hits record-low 32 percent in AP poll

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/354325-poll-trump-approval-hits-32-percent
Sort of throws your whole Hollywood and Leftist meme about a "new Hitler" and "populist nationalism" out the window? Or are we, using the "royal" we, still on the Russian thing? But, even so, in that "narrative," how is it both some racist, overwhelming movement but, yet, not popular in the Democrat media polls? Odd?


136 or 142

Quote from: GravitySucks on October 06, 2017, 10:36:13 PM
Wow. This one says 46%
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_oct06

RCP average is 39%
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

However, that averages includes polls that were taken during the Trump Administration's handling of the hurricanes that affected parts of Texas and Florida as well as during his bi-partisan deal.  The later polls have him at about 36% approval including the Rasmussen outlier.

Does Russia have independent pollsters, Comrade?

136 or 142

Quote from: albrecht on October 06, 2017, 10:39:12 PM
Sort of throws your whole Hollywood and Leftist meme about a "new Hitler" and "populist nationalism" out the window? Or are we, using the "royal" we, still on the Russian thing? But, even so, in that "narrative," how is it both some racist, overwhelming movement but, yet, not popular in the Democrat media polls? Odd?

Who said it was 'overwhelming'?  32% is still about 45 million voters.



Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 06, 2017, 10:13:57 PM
Trump approval hits record-low 32 percent in AP poll

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/354325-poll-trump-approval-hits-32-percent

First off, why wouldn't Trump have low poll numbers.  The pretend media has done nothing but trash him and accuse him of treason (with zero evidence) going on a year now, while at the same time ignoring the related actual felonies of Hilary Clinton, Berock Obama, and their toadies.  So with great earnestness, now they report his low poll numbers and express their collective dismay.  What a bunch of phonies.

But wait, there's also this:

And on top of Trump's low approval ratings, ''... a Reuters/Ipsos poll out earlier this week was the latest to tap into the trend. Of the 14,300 people surveyed, 48 percent expressed a “great deal of” or “some” confidence in the press...''

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/05/trump-media-battle-press-polls-243516 


Polls regarding elections are ultimately shown to be accurate or inaccurate.  As the Democrats learned, or should have learned last Fall.

There will of course not be a referendum on the current approval ratings of either Trump or the media to prove or disprove the above referenced fake polls.  48% of Americans trust the media?  Really?  Seriously?  With no fear of being proven wrong, gosh, who would lie about that?

136 or 142

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on October 06, 2017, 11:43:00 PM
First off, why wouldn't Trump have low poll numbers.  The pretend media has done nothing but trash him and accuse him of treason (with zero evidence) going on a year now, while at the same time ignoring the related actual felonies of Hilary Clinton, Berock Obama, and their toadies.  So with great earnestness, now they report his low poll numbers and express their collective dismay.  What a bunch of phonies.

But wait, there's also this:

And on top of Trump's low approval ratings, ''... a Reuters/Ipsos poll out earlier this week was the latest to tap into the trend. Of the 14,300 people surveyed, 48 percent expressed a “great deal of” or “some” confidence in the press...''

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/05/trump-media-battle-press-polls-243516 


Polls regarding elections are ultimately shown to be accurate or inaccurate.  As the Democrats learned, or should have learned last Fall.

There will of course not be a referendum on the current approval ratings of either Trump or the media to prove or disprove the above referenced fake polls.  48% of Americans trust the media?  Really?  Seriously?  With no fear of being proven wrong, gosh, who would lie about that?

You are such a tiresome whiny victim. (In addition to being mentally challenged.)


Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 06, 2017, 11:44:55 PM
You are such a tiresome whiny victim. (In addition to being mentally challenged.)

You know, you really ought to learn about critical thinking instead of trying to out-read everyone.

There's no point in reading all these biased media articles, polls, and statistics.  Learn how polls and statistics are put together and how they can be manipulated, rather than just taking them at face value.  There's no point in reading court cases written by liberal justices, who use sophistry in order to support the ruling they wanted all along instead of following the law.

What it boils down to is do you believe we need more government or less, more intrusion into our lives or less, handing more power over to government or less.  So you believe in strengthening our rights as listed in the first Ten Amendments, or having the government (mostly Democrats) continue to undermine them.  Do you believe policy should be determined at the ballot box or by thugs in the streets.  Should people be able to speak and hear speakers, or should self appointed thug groups be able to stop them.  Should people be able to keep what they earn and create, or have it resistributed.

Those are the things you should perhaps be concerned with, not tryng to prove whatever it is you are trying to prove with your fake statistics, fake news, fake polls, and phony legal findings. 

Lt.Uhura

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 06, 2017, 11:09:30 PM
RCP average is 39%
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

However, that averages includes polls that were taken during the Trump Administration's handling of the hurricanes that affected parts of Texas and Florida as well as during his bi-partisan deal.  The later polls have him at about 36% approval including the Rasmussen outlier.

Does Russia have independent pollsters, Comrade?

What's the significance of polls when his own Secretary of State thinks he's a "fucking moron"? Except for Jared & Ivanka his approval rating in his own WH is shit. Poor Kelly's having to work overtime to put out all his fires. He'll be the next to go. As a businessman Trump should know that high staff turnover is a sign of failed management at the top.

136 or 142

Quote from: PB the Deplorable on October 06, 2017, 11:56:13 PM
You know, you really ought to learn about critical thinking instead of trying to out-read everyone.

There's no point in reading all these biased media articles, polls, and statistics.  Learn how polls and statistics are put together and how they can be manipulated, rather than just taking them at face value.  There's no point in reading court cases written by liberal justices, who use sophistry in order to support the ruling they wanted all along instead of following the law.

What it boils down to is do you believe we need more government or less, more intrusion into our lives or less, handing more power over to government or less.  So you believe in strengthening our rights as listed in the first Ten Amendments, or having the government (mostly Democrats) continue to undermine them.  Do you believe policy should be determined at the ballot box or by thugs in the streets.  Should people be able to speak and hear speakers, or should self appointed thug groups be able to stop them.  Should people be able to keep what they earn and create, or have it resistributed.

Those are the things you should perhaps be concerned with, not tryng to prove whatever it is you are trying to prove with your fake statistics, fake news, fake polls, and phony legal findings.

I've shown time and time again that my ability to think critically and determine what is and is not 'fake news' is vastly superior to your ability.  However, that's not really saying anything as you are obviously mentally challenged and have very little ability to think at all, yet alone to think critically.

136 or 142

Quote from: Lt.Uhura on October 07, 2017, 12:02:59 AM
What's the significance of polls when his own Secretary of State thinks he's "fucking moron"? Except for Jared & Ivanka his approval rating in his own WH is shit. Poor Kelly's having to work overtime to put out all his fires. He'll be the next to go. As a businessman Trump should know that high staff turnover is a sign of failed management at the top.

I don't know who will be the next to go.  There are so many potential candidates.

pate

Quote
First off, why wouldn't Trump have low poll numbers..Hilary Clinton whine phoney

But wait, there's also this:

Election Polls

... Seriously?  With no fear of being proven wrong, miksa Enzyt-baba yaga...

Mmmn-oo!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxcM3nCsglA

pate

Quote from: Lt.Uhura on October 07, 2017, 12:02:59 AM
What's the significance of polls when his own Secretary of State thinks he's a "fucking moron"? Except for Jared & Ivanka his approval rating in his own WH is shit. Poor Kelly's having to work overtime to put out all his fires. He'll be the next to go. As a businessman Trump should know that high staff turnover is a sign of failed management at the top.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75SEy1qu71I

pate

Quote from: Lt.Uhura on October 07, 2017, 12:02:59 AM
...high staff turnover is a sign of failed management at the top.

Fucking Millenials and Baby Boomers.  Communists mainly, I enjoy the squeals as they plummet to the depths reserved for the ilk.

QuoteDid I type that out loud?

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: pate on October 07, 2017, 12:13:03 AM
Fucking Millenials and Baby Boomers.  Communists mainly, I enjoy the squeals as they plummet to the depths reserved for the ilk.

I see the kids in the black pyjamas are active tonight, pate.  :D


Swishypants

This had better be like the RED WEDDING but in Congress.

Kidnostad3

Quote from: 136 or 142 on October 06, 2017, 11:09:30 PM
RCP average is 39%
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

However, that averages includes polls that were taken during the Trump Administration's handling of the hurricanes that affected parts of Texas and Florida as well as during his bi-partisan deal.  The later polls have him at about 36% approval including the Rasmussen outlier.

Does Russia have independent pollsters, Comrade?

This is the mook who assurred us during the campaign that the USC/L.A. Times poll that had Trump ahead, despite it taking a much larger and more representative sampling of actual likely voters and it being taken on a weekly rather than monthly basis, was all wrong. This and the many other instances wherein his analysis and prognostications have proven dead wrong do not inspire confidence in his assessment.

136 or 142

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on October 07, 2017, 08:32:34 AM
This is the mook who assurred us during the campaign that the USC/L.A. Times poll that had Trump ahead, despite it taking a much larger and more representative sampling of actual likely voters and it being taken on a weekly rather than monthly basis, was all wrong. This and the many other instances wherein his analysis and prognostications have proven dead wrong do not inspire confidence in his assessment.

No election polls are taken on a monthly basis.  I don't remember that poll, but, while I completely concur that one of the reasons most election polls were off is that they had were mistaken in correctly assessing the 'likely voters' in that there were several million people who voted for Trump who had only rarely voted previously, and most polling firms tend be very suspicious of voters who say they intend to vote when they only rarely actually vote.

Two things however,
1.The degree to which the polls were incorrect has been dramatically and likely deliberately overstated by Trump supporters and those in general who bash pollsters.  There were two different aggregations of final election polls, one that gave Hillary Clinton a 3.8% lead, and another that gave her a 3.5% lead.  Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 2.2%.  So, the aggregate final polls were far from wildly off the mark.  It is true that a number of state polls of the Presidential election were well off (especially Ohio) which led most pundits to be overly confident in predicting a Hillary Clinton win.

2.It may be correct that the Los Angeles Times pollsters accurately picked up on the likelihood of these Trump voters who have previously rarely voted or it may be that they just got lucky.  To ascribe their forecasting skills to some kind of brilliant deduction when you don't know if it wasn't just luck is a logical fallacy known as the 'historian's fallacy.'  (Judging a prediction or looking back at an event based on the way it ultimately turned out, rather than judging the prediction or the event on the information that was known at the time.  Personally I'd prefer the term 'psychic's fallacy'.)

If you want to accuse me of not fully admitting I was wrong or something over this, that may be fair, but I remind you that in the case of the historian's fallacy, there are all sorts of Wall Street investment scammers and guests who appear on Coast to Coast who get lucky in predicting an event correctly that most people predicted would go the other way, who then claim to be geniuses when they aren't and make a lot of money over it.

PaulAtreides

Quote from: Up All Night on October 07, 2017, 05:23:58 AM


#Dotard is just trying to make certain that you "tune in next week." 

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod