BellGab.com Archive

Holy moly! That prize idiot Morningstar up tonight, telling us that  the Chinese have made contact with aliens who govern the Moon.

Couldn't they find anyone who actually knows anything?

It was so sweet of George not to ask the Pleadian guy any awkward questions such as "How come astronomers haven't seen you mile-long mother ship in Earth orbit?"

https://dorkmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/hoaglands-numerology.html

Here's an example of Hoagland's "glass domes" up in the sky. Funnily enough, the same pattern appears in Al Bean's shadow. What could be the reason for that? Hmmm...hmmmm...

Nick Pope was OK, I thought. Interesting.

https://dorkmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/exploring-outer-reaches-of-ignorance.html

Thanks. That's the chap.

"We are replaying our Moon weekend"

L-A-Z-Y

Anybody remember which guest it was who was an Apollo denier, who Noory advised to stay away from Buzz Aldrin lest he get punched out? It was not long ago.

Quote from: Sixteen on August 02, 2019, 05:41:34 AM
What is TGIP?  Urban dict was no help.

Thank God It's Paranormal

Quote from: Dateline on August 01, 2019, 08:06:01 AM
Don't know, I will be going to paranormal Happy Hour soon, and maybe I will find some information.

Does everyone say TGIP at those gatherings?

In Part 3 of the PBS epic "Chasing the Moon" there are several stills of the entire CBS news team covering Apollo 11. I looked for a widdle 24-year-old Dickie Hoagland, but he wasn't there. Booo.

Repeat of the above with added links, for better comprehension:

Subject: Blue flare in Apollo 14 sky

The flare in AS14-66-9301 cannot be what you say it is. It appears in eight other frames from the same mag, and on no other Apollo mag as far as I know.

AS14-66-9286 In a different part of the sky
AS14-66-9290 ditto
AS14-66-9295 ditto
AS14-66-9236 Superimposed on the lunar regolith
AS14-66-9276 Superimposed on the LM
AS14-66-9345 AFTER RETURN TO ORBIT
AS14-66-9346 ditto
AS14-66-9348 ditto

Is it not obvious that mag66 suffered some general damage, possibly from a cosmic ray?

Regards, [expat]

I sent this e-mail to RCH:

Subject: Blue flare in Apollo 14 sky

The flare in AS14-66-9301 cannot be what you say it is. It appears in eight other frames from the same mag, and on no other Apollo mag as far as I know.

AS14-66-9286 In a different part of the sky
AS14-66-9290 ditto
AS14-66-9295 ditto
AS14-66-9236 Superimposed on the lunar regolith
AS14-66-9276 Superimposed on the LM
AS14-66-9345 AFTER RETURN TO ORBIT
AS14-66-9346 ditto
AS14-66-9348 ditto

Is it not obvious that mag66 suffered some general damage, possibly from a cosmic ray?

Regards, [expat]

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on July 26, 2019, 03:47:56 PM
What was she like?

I wish...

FFS, if you believe this you'd believe I fucked Jane Birkin.

Quote from: Dateline on July 22, 2019, 08:59:44 PM
Have you thought about being a guest on Coast, the Anti-Bara?

Not really, no. Astroguy did, since Bara specifically slandered him on air ("He's a scientist but he sucks at it"). Noory was willing to set up a debate but Bara backed out after at first agreeing.

In other news, Rosemary Ellen Guily carked it.

It's now been a year since the last guest appearance by Mike Bara (not counting News Segment quickies). I'm sure he'd have been lobbying like hot shit to get a spot to plug his latest horrible book (about the Bermuda Triangle, as if the dozen books in print about it are not enough). COULD IT BE that Bara, like his former co-author, is persona non grata at the C2C lubianka?

That first hour was truly, truly pathetic. "Enhanced" (read: Corrupted) versions of Apollo photos show the network of glass covering the Moon. OH PLEASE.....

Here's another
http://dorkmission.blogspot.com/2015/08/richard-hoagland-contradicts-himself.html

Quote from: CronkitesGhost on July 21, 2019, 11:14:29 PM
what he claims to be able to clearly see in photos of the moon is insane, glass structures/cathedrals, prisms, he's harmless but he absolutely suffers from a delusional disorder. i don't think he's a fraud, he believes the shit he claims as do most of the guests on Coast. it's a blinding ambition/need to be more than you really are and Art Bell created a launch pad for them.

Here's one of my many debunks on the topic:
http://dorkmission.blogspot.com/2012/07/briefing-for-mike-blue-flares-in-lunar.html

Props to Ian for his mockery, last night, of that pea-brain who called in claiming that the films/videos of astronauts on the Moon were all shot on Earth but.... wait for it.... the spacesuits were filled with helium to simulate low gravity. [KLAXON]

Un-props for not equally mocking the other nincompoop who said "That part of the Moon is in permanent day. The reason you can't see stars in the photos is the same reason we don't see stars at daytime on Earth." [KLAXON]

Quote from: crankshaft on July 19, 2019, 03:02:29 PM
Um.
I know it was a while back in the thread but
Does anyone really seriously believe that RCH knows what a 'flywheel' is?

Oh I think so. This image is from his own webshite. It supposedly explains Bruce DePalma's original Accutron experiment, which RCH then bastardized all over the world until finally being tossed out of Chichen Itza. The fact that he chose to print the word "flywheel" in unreadable blue on black is a different question.

David Childress, the publisher who once wrote a 5-star Amazon review of a book he himself published. Nasty little man.

"The economy is going to boom starting in November. I see it in people's palms"

*eyeroll*

Quote from: Yorkshire pud on July 07, 2019, 10:03:33 AM
That's 100% more fact checking than Hoagie ever did.

Here's a little summary of some of my concerns about the value of Hoagland's Accutron games:
http://dorkmission.blogspot.com/2013/09/richard-hoaglands-homework-in-dog-bowl.html

"formally published paper" MY ASS. Of course I'm still waiting, six years later.

Quote from: CronkitesGhost on July 06, 2019, 11:04:17 PM
hey man you're a scientist. for us lay people who've been listening to Hoagie's pseudo scientific babble for years can you in fairly plain English explain what Hoagland *thinks* he's discovered regarding torsion field aka hyperdimensional physics?

thanks

He was totally thrilled by the report of an amateur scientist called Bruce DePalma (brother of Brian, as it goes) about the behavior of an Accutron wristwatch in close proximity to a 30lb flywheel rotating at 7600 rpm. DePalma reported that the watch lost 0.9 sec for every 1000 seconds near the flywheel.

Hoagland wrote: "DePalma proposed, as a result of his wide-ranging rotational experiments, that "rotating masses" in general set up some kind of hitherto unrecognized "inertial field" in their vicinity (the more widely-used term for this field now, because of how it's accessed, is a "torsion field" -- because "torsion" means literally "rotation")."

Can you spot the pseudofact? Torsion is not rotation but resistance to rotation.

Anyway, Hoagland extended this idea to the proposition that even bigger rotating bodies (but much further away) called "planets" might also generate torsion fields. He set up what he called an "experiment" during the Venus transit of June 2004. He's web-published two different versions of the results, neither of which is in any sense convincing, but he claims to have demonstrated the effect and has gone on to take his Accutron around the world "measuring" the torsion field during other astronomical events, such as eclipses.

Among the MANY problems with his protocol is the fact that the Accutron went most out of whack at Tikal at a time when there was no eclipse or transit.

Last night: Did I hear that bloody woman say "Consciousness is just a frequency"? If so, why is she spreading this utter bollocks?

Quote from: Morgus on July 02, 2019, 01:50:40 PM
Looks like Hoagie is trying to raise money with a go-fund-me now:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-other-side-of-midnight

Interesting...