• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

Ask Jackstar Anything

Started by Jackstar, October 08, 2018, 11:47:27 PM


Metron2267

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 31, 2019, 06:56:21 AM
Yes, you are.

Seethe...bubble...curse...spit...hate...lather...repeat... ::)

AZZERAE

Can someone assist me in a most urgent matter: the current top right corner pick "Hitler fighting gays", I cannot seem to find. I click on it, and it takes me to this thread ... but no line about the fuhrer, or physical combat, or homo's.

What gives?!

Quote from: Azzerae on January 31, 2019, 01:26:36 PM
Can someone assist me in a most urgent matter: the current top right corner pick "Hitler fighting gays", I cannot seem to find. I click on it, and it takes me to this thread ... but no line about the fuhrer, or physical combat, or homo's.

What gives?!

Dr. Mengele Dickfeaster is the Hitler reference.  He's engaged in a never-ending battle with faggots who keep putting their penis in his butt despite his unconvincing pleas to stop.

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 31, 2019, 06:52:49 AM
And you think that by ignoring the laws of physics in this one example you’ll win the argument. You don’t. It’s complete bullshit and you know it. Newton’s third law would dictate that although a collapse would’ve occured it wouldn’t have been complete and total and would’ve been eventually stopped by the force pushing back from underneath. Throwing another hissy fit isn’t going to change any of that...ever. It just makes you look like the pathetic, establishment-serving chump that you are. Just more proof that people who use the term troofers are totally gay. :D

Since this is my last comment on the subject, I will drop the insults and try to give it to you straight.  You show every indication of having only a superficial understanding of the physics involved in the collapse of the towers.  In fact, even physicists differ on some of the details of the collapse.  Nevertheless, you are taking your superficial understanding of the 3rd law and extrapolating a result that isn't really possible.

The building was structurally sound to support the upper floors that rested upon them.  However, the force exerted by the mass of the upper floors when it was moving far exceeded the design tolerances of the building's infrastructure.  You are positing that the ground would exert an equal and opposite force to counter the falling section, but what you are not considering is that the building did not have the structural integrity to transfer that force. 

In my previous post, I gave an example of a person sitting in a chair.  If the chair can support the weight of the person, then the force of the ground is transmitted through the chair to support the person.  If, however, you lifted the person into the air, and dropped him onto the chair, it is likely that the chair would break apart.  The person would then fall to the floor, which then exerts the "reaction" force you are talking about.

You are stuck on the 3rd law, but that's not what mattered.  It was the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy, and the effect that kinetic energy had on the towers.  I suppose this is Greek to you.  The information is freely available on the Internet, if you search for it.

I'll just leave this here: the force exerted by the towers, and the "reaction" force of the ground, was the same before and after the collapse.  It was just spread over a wider area.  Strange but true.

There's more to what happened during the collapse, but I'm not going to spend time talking about it unless someone else besides you or Jackster or Metreon asks about it.  You're comfortable in your shell, and really, it would be cruel to drag you out of it against your will and force you to face unpleasant reality.

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 07:25:24 PM
There's more to what happened during the collapse,

The Voice of Authority speaks.


I want you to take a moment--just one--and consider just how stupid and ignorant someone has to be to believe your bullshit fairy tale that's been blown apart every day for the last 17+ years, and realize, those are your people.


QuoteAn unbiased and scientific analysis is required due to inconsistencies on many fronts.”
â€" James Watkins, B.S. Civil Engineering. Engineer in Training (EIT) and eight-year army veteran (Iraq 2007 â€" 2009, Afghanistan 2009 â€" 2010).

“The NIST model [of WTC 7] does not represent the reality of the collapse. Therefore, NIST model assumptions were wrong somewhere. In addition to that, the collapse of one major column would not cause the whole building to collapse, and if it did, it will not collapse symmetrically.”
â€" Amin Talha, architect with 30 years of experience managing the construction of institutional, commercial, and residential high-rise buildings and single-family dwellings.

“Real investigations by the National Transportation Safety Board, Chemical Safety Board, etc., are thorough and to the highest ethical and professional standards â€" using all available evidence to arrive at logical, science-based conclusions. This type of investigation has yet to occur for the events of 9/11. The current dubious conclusions of the 9/11 investigation require cherry-picked evidence, a secret model that is off limits to peer review, and exclusion of contradictory evidence. The process used was anything but scientific.”
â€" Daniel Lambesis, chemical engineer with over 30 years of experience in the chemical industry.

“The manner of free-fall collapse of all the structures required removal of all structural support and the horizontal expelled matter required an introduced horizontal force.”
â€" Frankie Lee, P.E., engineering consultant with over 30 years of experience on construction-related projects and 20 years of working as a civil engineer.

“The official version of the events of 9/11 never made sense to me but, for some reason, I chose to ignore or dismiss my suspicions for 16 years. I am ready now to throw my weight behind the call for a new investigation.”
â€" Kevin Giambrone, P.E., structural engineer with expertise in bridges.

“[T]here are so many inconsistencies in the official reports on the tragic event and so many gaps, especially in the collapse of WTC 7, that only a new, independent investigation can confirm or delete suspicions and remove existing ambiguities. I therefore fully agree with the request to have the events re-examined independently.”
â€" Joerg Schneider, Professor Emeritus of Structural Engineering at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, former President of the Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS), and Vice President of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE).

“It is my professional opinion as an engineer with over 20 years of experience and a US Army officer combat engineer trained in explosives that the narrative put forth by the mainstream media is egregiously in error. The destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 was not as a result of aircraft impacts. The destruction and lives lost are the result of carefully placed demolitions. The truth needs to be disclosed to the public and those responsible for its destruction have a lot to answer for.”
â€" Jason Rice, P.E., structural engineer with over 20 years of experience as the engineer of record for various civil, commercial, and institutional projects.


I prefer science.

Quote from: Jackstar on January 31, 2019, 07:34:14 PM
I prefer science.

Me too.  Do you believe that the opinion of 0.000001% of the engineers in the world outweighs the opinions of the rest?  Sure you do.

Here's another problem that you ignore: none of these people, not a single solitary one, have authored a paper that presents an alternative model of the collapses of the towers.  They're JUST ASKING QUESTIONS, just like conspiracy nuts always do.  THEY HAVE DOUBTS.  IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO THEM.  Is that science to you?  Weird science, that.


Quote from: Jackstar on January 31, 2019, 07:55:44 PM
False equivalence. Go back to Reddit.

Keep dry-humping that conspiracy leg.  Seventeen years and counting, and nothing, in spite of alllllll that conclusive evidence.

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 07:59:21 PM
Seventeen years and counting, and nothing


massive rolleyes

Facts that you choose to ignore are still facts, Kid. Go read more books.

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 07:59:21 PM
nothing, in spite of alllllll that conclusive evidence.

[attachment=1]


Just a cohencidence, huh? Adorable.

Quote from: Jackstar on January 31, 2019, 07:34:14 PM
I prefer science.

Hey Mr. Science:



1)  Electrons don't orbit the nucleus like planets around the sun.  This has been understood for oh more than 100 years.

2)  Lithium-3 is so unstable that it cannot be created.

Metron2267

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 08:08:38 PM
Hey Mr. Science

2)  Lithium-3 is so unstable that it cannot be created.


..so I should return these?

Quote from: Metron2267 on January 31, 2019, 08:13:09 PM


..so I should return these?

I guess that you don't know what an ion is.

You continually surprise me with how ignorant you are.  I keep thinking, it can't get any worse.  Then it does.

Highly entertaining.  Please, keep going.

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 08:08:38 PM
Electrons don't orbit

Response #1: That's not an electron. That's a .gif.

Response #2: "Become incredulous and indignant.  Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit."


source: http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
surrender: ACCEPTED



Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 08:16:26 PM
Highly entertaining.  Please, keep going.

cowardice: NOTED

Jackstar



Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Metron2267 on January 31, 2019, 10:33:25 AM
Seethe...bubble...curse...spit...hate...lather...repeat... ::)

You’re still the neediest faggot on Bellgab.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 08:16:26 PM
I guess that you don't know what an ion is.

You continually surprise me with how ignorant you are.  I keep thinking, it can't get any worse.  Then it does.

Highly entertaining.  Please, keep going.

I hate to agree with you but he’s at least as annoyingly stupid as you are, if not more.

Jackstar


Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 31, 2019, 08:34:10 PM
I hate to agree with you but he’s at least as annoyingly stupid as you are, if not more.

You see?  There are things we can agree on.  It's a way forward to tolerance and coexistence while I am buggering you in the tailpipe.

I use coconut oil as a lubricant.  It has anti-bacterial properties as well as being a dandy slip-and-slide lube.  Can we agree on that, too?

Quote from: Jackstar on January 31, 2019, 08:37:18 PM
You're projecting again. It's adorable.

You're cute, and I'm adorable.  It's like...it's like it was meant to be between us.

What are you doing tonight?  Up for a little frottage?  I'll have some coconut oil left over, once I'm done with Dr. Dickhead Taintlapper.

Quote from: Jackstar on January 31, 2019, 08:19:25 PM
surrender: ACCEPTED

[shrug] Whatevah.  I don't have to explain myself to paranoid retards.  I'm not the fuckface whisperer.

SpaceMeowMaid

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 07:54:31 PM
.

Here's another problem that you ignore: none of these people, not a single solitary one, have authored a paper that presents an alternative model of the collapses of the towers.  They're JUST ASKING QUESTIONS, just like conspiracy nuts always do.  THEY HAVE DOUBTS.  IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO THEM.  Is that science to you?  Weird science, that.

I have seen a few examples of alternative physics theories that actually are possible but they all point to controlled demolition...


Richard Gage
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS AROUND THE WORLD MOSTLY ALL UNFAMILIAR WITH THE THIRD WORST STRUCTURAL FAILURE IN MODERN HISTORY. HERE IS A 47 STORY SKYSCRAPER AT 5:20 IN THE AFTERNOON, IT DROPPED LIKE A ROCK. THIS PAST. -- THIS FAST, FREEFALL ACCELERATION, STRAIGHT DOWN, UNIFORMLY, SYMMETRICALLY. A BUILDING WITH 47 TONS OF STRUCTURAL STEEL CANNOT FALL STRAIGHT DOWN LIKE WE SAW DUE TO NORMAL OFFICE FIRES. THE OFFICIAL REASON GIVEN US -- GIVEN TO US BY THE NATIONAL STANDARDS OF TECHNOLOGY WITHOUT 80 COLUMNS ON EACH FLOOR BEING REMOVED SIMULTANEOUSLY. WE HAVE SEEN THIS LIKE THE OLD HOTELS IN LAS VEGAS. IT LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. THEY TELL US, NO, THIS CAME DOWN DUE TO A NORMAL OFFICE FIRE. YOU CAN BEGIN TO SEE THE PROBLEM RIGHT OFF THE BAT. NORMAL OFFICE FIRES HAVE NEVER BROUGHT DOWN A SKYSCRAPER EVER BEFORE. WE HAVE STEEL FRAME, FIREPROOF SKYSCRAPERS FOR A GOOD REASON. IF THEY HAVE PROTECTED OUR TOWERS FOR A LONG, LONG TIME. THE 2200 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS THAT I REPRESENT AROUND THE WORLD IN OVER 300 PRESENTATIONS NOW IN 32 COUNTRIES AND 82 AMERICAN CITIES , THEY HAVE PRESENTED THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXPLOSIVE DEMOLITION. THAT EVIDENCE IS SEEN NOT ONLY IN THE VIDEOS OF THE BUILDINGS, BUT HER BY THE FIRST RESPONDERS -- HEARD OF BY THE FIRST RESPONDERS WHO CITE THE EXPLOSIONS. WHO CITE THE POOLS OF MOLTEN IRON FLOWING LIKE LAVA, THEY SAY. LESLIE ROBERTSON HIMSELF CITES A RIVER OF STEEL FLOWING. THESE ARE EVIDENCE OF TEMPERATURES EXCEEDING 2800 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. OFFICE FIRES CAN'T EVEN GET TO 1000 DEGREES SHORT OF THAT. WE HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM. UNDER THE OFFICIAL STORY, EVIDENCE OF WALTON IRON -- MOLTEN IRON DOCUMENTED BY FEMA ITSELF IN THE FIRST REPORT. MAY OF 2002. WHICH DOCUMENTS HOT SULFUR CORROSION. THE AUTHOR OF THAT REPORT SAID THE ENDS OF THE BEAMS WERE PARTIALLY EVAPORATED. THAT TAKES 4000 DEGREE TEMPERATURES. THE ONLY THING WE ARE AWARE OF THAT CAN CREATE THAT IS THERMITE. IT'S AN INCENDIARY A USED BY THE MILITARY TO CUT THROUGH STEEL LIKE A HOT KNIFE THROUGH BUTTER. THIS IS WHY WE HAVE TO HAVE A REAL INVESTIGATION THAT LOOKS AT THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY HAVE REJECTED FROM THE REPORT AFTER THEY CAME IN IN 2004 AND THREW AWAY THE FEMA REPORT. HOST: THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY? GUEST: THAT IS CORRECT. 
00:05:34
Peter Slen   

Quote from: Flyingmerkitty on February 01, 2019, 12:47:04 AM
IT LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

No one who ever saw a controlled demolition would say that.

Quote from: Flyingmerkitty on February 01, 2019, 12:47:04 AM
A RIVER OF STEEL FLOWING.

It's horseshit like this that just makes me throw up my hands when dealing with troofers.  A "river of steel" Jesus H. Christ on a popsicle stick.  The troofers won't believe a formal investigation with documentation of evidence, but they believe some incoherent stream-of-thought rant riddled with debunked claims made by someone with a stuck caps lock key.  Why would anyone waste their time with people like this?

AZZERAE

Oh dear, sleepily up for a drink of water, I seem to have stumbled into yet another hardcore gay porn thread.

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on February 01, 2019, 01:19:04 AM
No one who ever saw a controlled demolition would say that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w


Suck my fat one, you cheap dimestore hood.

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on February 01, 2019, 01:19:04 AM
A "river of steel" Jesus H. Christ on a popsicle stick.

[attachment=1]


This kind of head-in-the-sand bullshit from you might work on someone who wasn't alive, watching TV, for a week after the event they were showing footage of molten metal glowing like a CIA square dance every night. FOR A WEEK.

If you weren't twelve, you would have seen it as well. Go back to the lunchroom.

Quote from: Azzerae on February 01, 2019, 01:22:55 AM
Oh dear, sleepily up for a drink of water, I seem to have stumbled into yet another hardcore gay porn thread.

And yet you stayed up and read it all.  Hey, some people (especially chicks) really get off on two dudes going at it.  Nothing to be ashamed of.

I don't have too much gay porn on my computer, but I'm sure that somebody here could hook you up.  In fact, this entire thread would be more useful if it was filled with nothing but hot gay porn.

"Ask Jackstar Anything"  Hey Jack, this thread has kind of run its course, mind if we convert it to a Bellgab repository of hot gay porn?

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on February 01, 2019, 01:56:06 AM
Hey Jack, this thread has kind of run its course, [...]?

And yet, queries still flood in. Don't get ahead of yourself. Did you get a gold star in fingerpainting yet? Keep hitting those books. I'll let you know when your skillset is in demand.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod