• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 11, 2011, 01:33:34 AM

Faustina

Trump is having his "Special Event" at the same time as the debate, I heard.  What if that's televised by CNN and they end up getting better ratings than Fox News as a result?

GravitySucks

Quote from: Faustina on January 27, 2016, 11:20:38 PM
Trump is having his "Special Event" at the same time as the debate, I heard.  What if that's televised by CNN and they end up getting better ratings than Fox News as a result?

It would be epic

Faustina

Quote from: GravitySucks on January 27, 2016, 11:21:38 PM
It would be epic

Or maybe MSNBC will to try to get TV viewers to remember that it exists.

Quote from: GravitySucks on January 27, 2016, 09:55:49 PM
Good find BLM
PNAE "new american economy" basically means globalist slavery in the US.

VtaGeezer

I think the dust-up with Fox is Trump's excuse for pulling the debate rug out from under Cruz, who's been diagramming and rehearsing how he's going to annihilate DT in thi debate for weeks, except now DT won't be there.  Rafael is pulling an all-nighter to figure out what to do; probably something o-so-clever like bringing out a Trump doll and pretending Trump is there. 

I'll watch to see if DT will open his parallel event at Drake by remarking how the crowd chose to see him rather than watch the battle of the midgets on Fox. I watched Trump on with O'Reilly tonight it was comical to see Billo all but begging DT to show up (and increase the Fox ad revenue several fold).  DT, after saying he only showed tonight because he promised to a week a go,  pretty much blew O'Reilly off.

MV/Liberace!

Quote from: VtaGeezer on January 27, 2016, 11:42:30 PM
I watched Trump on with O'Reilly tonight it was comical to see Billo all but begging DT to show up (and increase the Fox ad revenue several fold).  DT, after saying he only showed tonight because he promised to a week a go,  pretty much blew O'Reilly off.

it was great tv.

Quote from: FightTheFuture on January 27, 2016, 12:31:39 AM
Soft porn?? ReallY? If you think that`s soft porn, you better stay hidden in the basement.




Guys guys, take Megyn Kelly seriously.  She isn't some bimbo getting by on her looks.

Quote from: Black Lives Matter on January 27, 2016, 09:54:04 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4BFSPI17vE

Why FOX hates Trump.
Turns out Rupert Murdoch is the Co-Chair for PNAE, Project for New American Economy,
one of the most powerful open-borders lobbying firms in the country.

What horseshit.

Fox News airs close-the-border personalities 24/7. Practically every time I turn FNC on they`re railing about the open borders. Hannity probably talks about it every 15 minutes. O`Reilly not far behind. In fact, the only time ANY air is given to anything approaching a modest immigration policy is when they roll Geraldo out to argue with someone about it.

The reason Trump said "Fox is playing games..." is because of a news release earlier that day. Roger Aliles basically told Trump to kiss his ass, he wasn`t going to play his stupid little game and dump Megyn Kelly. Trump got pissed and quit.

O`Reily is old friends with Trump from many years ago, so...he reckoned it would be good TV to do the ol` "Come on, Donald..this is your old bud, Bill`O`talking" routine.


Quote from: The King of Kings on January 28, 2016, 01:15:53 AM


Guys guys, take Megyn Kelly seriously.  She isn't some bimbo getting by on her looks.

Where do you even find that stuff?? Second thoughts, I don`t want to know. I would get some help though...if i were you.

Quote from: MV on January 28, 2016, 01:03:29 AM
it was great tv.

Exactly. Mrs. O`Reilly didn`t raise any fools.

Quote from: Faustina on January 27, 2016, 11:20:38 PM
Trump is having his "Special Event" at the same time as the debate, I heard.  What if that's televised by CNN and they end up getting better ratings than Fox News as a result?

I think more interesting will be if Trump accepts Cruz`s offer of $1.5M (far more than he could hope to raise at his "event") to "the vets" if DT will debate him mano a mano.

My guess is, he won`t.

albrecht

Quote from: VtaGeezer on January 27, 2016, 10:35:56 PM
Murdock met with Bloomberg today.
I seem to recall Murdock supported Billary back in the day against Obama and the Republican candidates. At least rumors thereof. Normally guys like Bloomberg like to be 'behind the scenes' more manipulating but, then again, he proved he likes politics in NYC mayorial position. It would be a huge game changer and he would bring in a lot of personal money, bank money, foreign interest money, and could have whole news networks (his owned and Fox) to push him.
But the more liberal types, BLM, etc won't like him:
he has some 'troubling' comments about blacks in the past (even if factual) it is hard for a politician, especially running in the Democratic Party (assuming he would,) make such statements.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/06/28/2231761/mayor-bloomberg-nypd-stop-whites-too-much-and-minorities-too-little/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/02/07/bloomberg-suggests-banning-young-minority-males-from-gun-ownership/

Quote from: FightTheFuture on January 28, 2016, 05:30:52 AM
What horseshit.

Fox News airs close-the-border personalities 24/7. Practically every time I turn FNC on they`re railing about the open borders. Hannity probably talks about it every 15 minutes. O`Reilly not far behind. In fact, the only time ANY air is given to anything approaching a modest immigration policy is when they roll Geraldo out to argue with someone about it.

The reason Trump said "Fox is playing games..." is because of a news release earlier that day. Roger Aliles basically told Trump to kiss his ass, he wasn`t going to play his stupid little game and dump Megyn Kelly. Trump got pissed and quit.

O`Reily is old friends with Trump from many years ago, so...he reckoned it would be good TV to do the ol` "Come on, Donald..this is your old bud, Bill`O`talking" routine.
the Partnership for a New American Economy is a coalition of business leaders and mayors launched by Michael Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch to influence public opinion and policymakers toward comprehensive immigration reform. "The partnership will enable Mayors and CEOs to demonstrate to policymakers the vital role that immigration plays in our economy by publishing studies, conducting polls, convening forums, and sponsoring public education campaigns."[1] Among other goals, the partnership will pursue Congress and the White House to enact legislation which will create "a path to legal status for all undocumented immigrants now in the United States".[2] The partnership will seek to influence "by publishing studies, conducting polls, convening forums, and sponsoring public education campaigns".[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership_for_a_New_American_Economy

Quote from: FightTheFuture on January 28, 2016, 05:33:36 AM
Where do you even find that stuff?? Second thoughts, I don`t want to know. I would get some help though...if i were you.

Deep web bro, aka google image searching "megyn kelly"

I know it's the dark web.

Seriously though, keep thinking some bimbo who gets up  and puts on a skimpy, tight, low cut red mini-skirt, high heels and caked on make-up to go to work should be treated as more than a whore.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8OFd7u7tmM


FOX planned to set up Trump with this bitch.

“Fox was hoping to get $750,000 a minute, I heard, and they may be down to $150,000 a minute if Trump isn't there."
Let’s do the math. That’s a $600,000 per minute loss - - equals about 36 million dollars per hour. But the reputational losses can be far, far greater.

According to Breibart, Google and Fox had invited a popular Muslim YouTuber who has compared Trump with Hitler to participate in asking questions during the debate. Her name is Nabela Noor. In a December YouTube she said:
“We have a presidential candidate whose loudest message reeks of hatred and Islamophobia…”
Hmmm, Islamaphobia is a term Muslim leaders cooked up years ago to quickly dismiss and neutralize the inevitable and justified criticism they knew was coming over the horizon.
It’s a safe bet that her questions towards Trump would be run repeatedly in Hillary Clinton attack ads. If Trump doesn’t show, that noxious split-screen opportunity will be lost and Clinton’s minions would have to settle for cuts between unrelated events.

Quote from: Black Lives Matter on January 28, 2016, 11:35:46 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8OFd7u7tmM


FOX planned to set up Trump with this bitch.

“Fox was hoping to get $750,000 a minute, I heard, and they may be down to $150,000 a minute if Trump isn't there."
Let’s do the math. That’s a $600,000 per minute loss - - equals about 36 million dollars per hour. But the reputational losses can be far, far greater.

According to Breibart, Google and Fox had invited a popular Muslim YouTuber who has compared Trump with Hitler to participate in asking questions during the debate. Her name is Nabela Noor. In a December YouTube she said:
“We have a presidential candidate whose loudest message reeks of hatred and Islamophobia…”
Hmmm, Islamaphobia is a term Muslim leaders cooked up years ago to quickly dismiss and neutralize the inevitable and justified criticism they knew was coming over the horizon.
It’s a safe bet that her questions towards Trump would be run repeatedly in Hillary Clinton attack ads. If Trump doesn’t show, that noxious split-screen opportunity will be lost and Clinton’s minions would have to settle for cuts between unrelated events.

Exactly.  Why would Trump give any legitimacy to some muslim cunt who was there just to attack Trump?

Trump is going to go out of his way to enrich Fox News with his presence?  Not likely. 

Fox News is dead, Trump killed it just by not showing up.

It's going to be pathetic tonight.  Just a couple cubans arguing, while Jeb Bush thinks about guacamole while he carries toy turtles in his pocket and Chris Christie wondering when he can talk so he can tell everyone he going to throw everyone in jail?  No thanks.

Watching Trump on CNN, where the real candidate will be.

Watching liberals defend one of Fox's bimbos and Fox News' debate makes me seriously question how I was a part of that echo chamber for most of my life.

Jackstar

Quote from: VoteQuimby on January 28, 2016, 12:35:19 PM
Watching liberals defend one of Fox's bimbos and Fox News' debate makes me seriously question how I was a part of that echo chamber for most of my life.

Sweet, this is the perfect time to start castigating you over your hatred of Colonel Sanders.

Whose kid are you?

Quote from: Black Lives Matter on January 28, 2016, 11:35:46 AM
According to Breibart, Google and Fox had invited a popular Muslim YouTuber who has compared Trump with Hitler to participate in asking questions during the debate. Her name is Nabela Noor. In a December YouTube she said:
“We have a presidential candidate whose loudest message reeks of hatred and Islamophobia…”
Hmmm, Islamaphobia is a term Muslim leaders cooked up years ago to quickly dismiss and neutralize the inevitable and justified criticism they knew was coming over the horizon.
It’s a safe bet that her questions towards Trump would be run repeatedly in Hillary Clinton attack ads. If Trump doesn’t show, that noxious split-screen opportunity will be lost and Clinton’s minions would have to settle for cuts between unrelated events.

What the fuck kind of gross SJW bullshit is that?

Trump blowing off Fox, killing off their money and then whooping their bitch asses in ratings is brilliant. WE'RE GOING LIVE! FUCK IT!

Quote from: Jackstar on January 28, 2016, 12:37:20 PM
Sweet, this is the perfect time to start castigating you over your hatred of Colonel Sanders.

Whose kid are you?

The finest musician of the 20th century? What are you talking about? I love the Colonel.

Jackstar

Quote from: VoteQuimby on January 28, 2016, 12:52:59 PM
The finest musician of the 20th century? What are you talking about? I love the Colonel.

Fat, drunk, and deliberately obtuse is no way to go through Life, Son.

GravitySucks

Quote from: Black Lives Matter on January 28, 2016, 11:35:46 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8OFd7u7tmM


FOX planned to set up Trump with this bitch.

“Fox was hoping to get $750,000 a minute, I heard, and they may be down to $150,000 a minute if Trump isn't there."
Let’s do the math. That’s a $600,000 per minute loss - - equals about 36 million dollars per hour. But the reputational losses can be far, far greater.

According to Breibart, Google and Fox had invited a popular Muslim YouTuber who has compared Trump with Hitler to participate in asking questions during the debate. Her name is Nabela Noor. In a December YouTube she said:
“We have a presidential candidate whose loudest message reeks of hatred and Islamophobia…”
Hmmm, Islamaphobia is a term Muslim leaders cooked up years ago to quickly dismiss and neutralize the inevitable and justified criticism they knew was coming over the horizon.
It’s a safe bet that her questions towards Trump would be run repeatedly in Hillary Clinton attack ads. If Trump doesn’t show, that noxious split-screen opportunity will be lost and Clinton’s minions would have to settle for cuts between unrelated events.

I think your math is a little off. I think the meant $600,000 for a minute long commercial spot. They will still lose out on money, but only for the minutes they run commercials, not all 60 minutes in each hour.


Philosopher

Quote from: The King of Kings on January 28, 2016, 01:15:53 AM


Guys guys, take Megyn Kelly seriously.  She isn't some bimbo getting by on her looks.

She can barely formulate a sentence, let alone a paragraph while speaking. 

But that is not my biggest problem with Fox News.  It has been very profitable for them, but they are all style over substance, right down to their so-called expert guests they have on for interviews.  Watching Fox News one would think that every Ph.D. interviewee is a 23 year old blond woman who looks like a deer caught in headlights.  This country has thousands of the brightest, most educated minds in the world to pick from, both men and women, but Fox keeps "trotting" out "experts" who just got their degree last week or Uncle Bubba hired them to be a VP straight out of university. 

C-Span is no different.  They were interviewing an attractive 24 year old woman recently with only 3 years of experience as a reporter covering the Federal Reserve.  Yet, she was treated like a world-class expert with the interviewer hanging on her every word. 

Is something wrong here, or is it just me?

Jackstar

Quote from: Philosopher on January 28, 2016, 01:12:17 PM
Is something wrong here, or is it just me?

doublethink unplusgood

Quote from: GravitySucks on January 28, 2016, 01:02:12 PM
I think your math is a little off. I think the meant $600,000 for a minute long commercial spot. They will still lose out on money, but only for the minutes they run commercials, not all 60 minutes in each hour.
right, but I didn't do the math, Bill Still did. How many minutes per hour are ads during a debate?

albrecht

Quote from: Philosopher on January 28, 2016, 01:12:17 PM
She can barely formulate a sentence, let alone a paragraph while speaking. 

But that is not my biggest problem with Fox News.  It has been very profitable for them, but they are all style over substance, right down to their so-called expert guests they have on for interviews.  Watching Fox News one would think that every Ph.D. interviewee is a 23 year old blond woman who looks like a deer caught in headlights.  This country has thousands of the brightest, most educated minds in the world to pick from, both men and women, but Fox keeps "trotting" out "experts" who just got their degree last week or Uncle Bubba hired them to be a VP straight out of university. 

C-Span is no different.  They were interviewing an attractive 24 year old woman recently with only 3 years of experience as a reporter covering the Federal Reserve.  Yet, she was treated like a world-class expert with the interviewer hanging on her every word. 

Is something wrong here, or is it just me?
The only possible reason to get one's news via tv or video is that rare possibility that one can tell the politician/interviewee is lying by visual cues or spot anomalies or rare cases "live" news that exposes something real or unexpected. But since politicians and spokespeople are taught ways to dress, blink, act etc so as to not look like they are lying and most news is not 'live' and is managed, edited, and delayed there is no reason to watch. Unless it for watching the bimbos or visceral experience of seeing blown up people, car crashes, or fireworks. Otherwise print, radio, etc is a better news source. (Not saying all is true or not vetted, corporate/government press releases etc but at least you have data to analyze, go back over, compare to other sources, etc.)

News coming out that the muslim woman who was there to ambush Trump is a bernie supporter.

Trump wins again.

Megyn Kelly is still a bimbo whore.

Deal with it.


chefist

Trump skips debate tonight...guess the #1 topic they are discussing?  TRUMP!!! LOL Trump wins...

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod