• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

All the Creeps are on Ignore

Started by Tootsie, December 09, 2018, 09:23:41 AM


Heard it before. Won’t last a Day. 




ZaZa

"All the Creeps are on Ignore"

Me too ?

No one is on ignore. It drives her too crazy to think she might miss any little thing. She is incapable of doing it. Says it all the time and within hours quotes you in a reply.

Metron2267

Quote from: Enard P Farkwark on December 09, 2018, 01:24:38 PM
No one is on ignore. It drives her too crazy to think she might miss any little thing. She is incapable of doing it. Says it all the time and within hours quotes you in a reply.

You literally add NOTHING to this forum.

Quote from: Metron2267 on December 09, 2018, 01:28:13 PM
You literally add NOTHING to this forum.
And you do?  Shouldn’t you be out gathering signatures for the communist party to have ballot access for the next election cycle?  Oh wait socialist drones are almost always too lazy to actually DO ANYTHING unless you count sitting around whining on the internet.

Metron2267

Quote from: Enard P Farkwark on December 09, 2018, 01:30:31 PM
And you do?

Oh yes, I certainly do.

[quote Shouldn’t you be out gathering signatures for the communist party to have ballot access for the next election cycle?  Oh wait socialist drones are almost always too lazy to actually DO ANYTHING unless you count sitting around whining on the internet.

The other thing is that when you do try to be substantive you end up simply being wrong.

Like Weiner I favor the American Constitution Party, though I also hold many libertarian precepts to be sound and sensible. Cope.




Quote from: Metron2267 on December 09, 2018, 01:32:46 PM
The other thing is that when you do try to be substantive you end up simply being wrong.

Like Weiner I favor the American Constitution Party, though I also hold many libertarian precepts to be sound and sensible. Cope.

I don’t at all hate the constitution party in fact I’ve voted that way. You must misunderstand many originalist principles.

Metron2267

Quote from: Enard P Farkwark on December 09, 2018, 01:51:45 PM
I don’t at all hate the constitution party in fact I’ve voted that way. You must misunderstand many originalist principles.

Do I?

Perhaps you would care to list them for me:



Take all the screens you need.

Quote from: Metron2267 on December 09, 2018, 01:53:32 PM
Do I?

Perhaps you would care to list them for me:



Take all the screens you need.

I don’t have the time to go back through each example. I’m honestly not in disagreement with you on a number of things like your stated support for Perot’s general platform however calling Bush 2 a logical choice?  The guy who delivered unto us the massive social program of Medicare part D as a wolf in sheep’s clothing?

Vote your principles not the lesser of two evils.  I’m not suggesting Al Snore would’ve been better by any means but you have to just reject the paradigm complete win the long game.

I also am flummoxed at you buddying up to the self proclaimed Antifa wacko. I am confused by anyone who would essentially try to buddy up to anyone who would without hesitation brain you with a bike lock or fling their poop at you like an animal if you did as much as attend a rally for something like the constitution party. After all they’re on the infallible SPLC’s hate groups list don’tcha know.

More or less I’m just confused by your apparent fluctuations.

Quote from: Metron2267 on December 07, 2018, 12:23:14 PM
Fair dinkum, as the Aussies say!

I found Dubya to be a logical choice over the Prince of Sighs (Al Bore) and a vast improvement over John Kerry who actually announced in the debates his intention to sell enriched Uranium to the Iranian Mullahs.

Sadly the last candidate who met many of my needs never did more than deliver us unto Clinton. Ross Perot was a last best hope before this nation went pure globalist rot.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Metron2267 on December 09, 2018, 01:28:13 PM
You literally add NOTHING to this forum.

Didn’t we already have this discussion, Ellgab mole?

Jesus, you’re starting to sound like Dave Schrader.  ::) ;D

Metron2267

Quote from: Enard P Farkwark on December 09, 2018, 02:12:47 PM
I don’t have the time to go back through each example. I’m honestly not in disagreement with you on a number of things like your stated support for Perot’s general platform however calling Bush 2 a logical choice?  The guy who delivered unto us the massive social program of Medicare part D as a wolf in sheep’s clothing?

Please demonstrate for the any logic in the choice of the Goreon?

We conservatives  had a choice, we had mostly Bush's governance resume in Texas to go by, and frankly McStain might have been far worse had he broken from the pack and taken the nomination, agreed?

QuoteVote your principles not the lesser of two evils.  I’m not suggesting Al Snore would’ve been better by any means but you have to just reject the paradigm complete win the long game.

A 3rd party vote remains by any measure a wasted vote.

QuoteI also am flummoxed at you buddying up to the self proclaimed Antifa wacko.

And who is this person?

QuoteI am confused by anyone who would essentially try to buddy up to anyone who would without hesitation brain you with a bike lock or fling their poop at you like an animal if you did as much as attend a rally for something like the constitution party. After all they’re on the infallible SPLC’s hate groups list don’tcha know.

More or less I’m just confused by your apparent fluctuations.

Of course, that's the drug of the Hegelian sort - an either/or decision tree is like a quarterback with only 2 receivers.

Metron2267

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on December 09, 2018, 02:14:33 PM
Didn’t we already have this discussion, Ellgab mole?

It's not a "discussion" Dr. Safe Space, it's an observation.

QuoteJesus, you’re starting to sound like Dave Schrader.  ::) ;D

Well that stings! :(


Quote from: Metron2267 on December 09, 2018, 03:18:57 PM
Please demonstrate for the any logic in the choice of the Goreon?

We conservatives  had a choice, we had mostly Bush's governance resume in Texas to go by, and frankly McStain might have been far worse had he broken from the pack and taken the nomination, agreed?

A 3rd party vote remains by any measure a wasted vote.

And who is this person?

Of course, that's the drug of the Hegelian sort - an either/or decision tree is like a quarterback with only 2 receivers.

That other person I referred to in regard to Antifa charter membership is tootsie. No idea how you wouldn’t have noticed that.

I voted Trump at the polls last presidential go round only because I was already there and found the lazy ass constitution party hadn’t gained ballot access in Texas. I continue to reject the two party system and will continue to push for something on the order of ranked voting to change the paradigm.

Jojo

Quote from: Enard P Farkwark on December 09, 2018, 01:24:38 PM
No one is on ignore. It drives her too crazy to think she might miss any little thing. She is incapable of doing it. Says it all the time and within hours quotes you in a reply.
You know you can quote people you have on ignore, right?. And, if someone else quotes them, you would see it.  I have people on ignore but see and respond to many of their posts.



Tootsie

Quote from: Enard P Farkwark on December 09, 2018, 09:15:31 PM
That other person I referred to in regard to Antifa charter membership is tootsie. No idea how you wouldn’t have noticed that.

I voted Trump at the polls last presidential go round only because I was already there and found the lazy ass constitution party hadn’t gained ballot access in Texas. I continue to reject the two party system and will continue to push for something on the order of ranked voting to change the paradigm.

LOL according to this enid Pee fartwacky, i am a boy in a basement, Heather, Tiny Hands, an antifa member( because i posted Antifa pic long ago to get someone's goat) and who knows who or what else. he knows nothing about me..He is a sick sick nut who follows me around this board accusing me of everything under the sun... he is nothing but a terrible pest...

Tootsie

Quote from: 14 on December 10, 2018, 03:11:31 AM
You know you can quote people you have on ignore, right?. And, if someone else quotes them, you would see it.  I have people on ignore but see and respond to many of their posts.

yes, i know.. no point ignoring.. depends on my mood. thanks   :)

WeinerInHand

Quote from: Metron2267 on December 09, 2018, 01:32:46 PM

Like Weiner I favor the American Constitution Party, though I also hold many libertarian precepts to be sound and sensible. Cope.




Metron2267

Quote from: Enard P Farkwark on December 09, 2018, 09:15:31 PM
That other person I referred to in regard to Antifa charter membership is tootsie. No idea how you wouldn’t have noticed that.

Perhaps because I don't recall her making such a claim.

Is it possible you're taking her gamesmanship as full-on truth?

QuoteI voted Trump at the polls last presidential go round only because I was already there and found the lazy ass constitution party hadn’t gained ballot access in Texas. I continue to reject the two party system and will continue to push for something on the order of ranked voting to change the paradigm.
Wow, just fucking wow.

You CLAIM to be supporting the "lazy ass constitution party" and yet simultaneously seek to destroy the very CONSTITUTIONAL "one man one vote" that our framers set this nation up with????

FRAUD!

FUCKING GODDAMNED FRAUD TRASH TRAITOR TO AMERICA!

DIAF motherrfucker!

>:( >:( >:( >:(


Quote from: Metron2267 on December 10, 2018, 11:21:09 AM
Perhaps because I don't recall her making such a claim.

Is it possible you're taking her gamesmanship as full-on truth?
Wow, just fucking wow.

You CLAIM to be supporting the "lazy ass constitution party" and yet simultaneously seek to destroy the very CONSTITUTIONAL "one man one vote" that our framers set this nation up with????

FRAUD!

FUCKING GODDAMNED FRAUD TRASH TRAITOR TO AMERICA!

DIAF motherrfucker!

>:( >:( >:( >:(
You appear to be a massive retard. In no way have I done anything to destroy the idea of one man one vote.  I also don’t just claim to support the party because of the principles it advances. I actually do so.

While people like you are keyboard warrioring on here like blowhards to an audience of only yourself I actually have spent hundreds of hours working ballot access petitions, running information booths, on state and national meetings and platform committees and served as a state delegate to the national convention not to mention the actual monetary contributions over the years. The only reason I don’t post very specific details as proof is I don’t care to dox myself for rabid poop flingers or the mentally unbalanced and have to spend time in court after one of you mentally unstable nitwits causes me to have to defend myself in some way after being tracked down. I can use my time more productively than that.

You aren’t familiar with tootsies antifa nonsense because you were quarantined in the neighboring territory because you consistently behave like an idiot. That’s why I don’t feel bad about a thing over here as far as toileting up threads is concerned. It’s already far beyond saving.

Metron2267

Quote from: Enard P Farkwark on December 10, 2018, 12:50:13 PM
You appear to be a massive retard. In no way have I done anything to destroy the idea of one man one vote.

LIAR!

Your own words:

Quotecontinue to reject the two party system and will continue to push for something on the order of ranked voting to change the paradigm.

NO THANK YOU TRUDUMB!

Keep that vote rigging and candidate bleaching up in your own walk in cooler of a nation:

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/08/15/a-look-at-the-pros-and-cons-of-the-voting-system-once-touted-by-trudeau_n_11522342.html

OTTAWA â€" Justin Trudeau has promised that last fall's federal election will be the last conducted under the first-past-the-post voting system.
In the past, the prime minister has expressed a preference for replacing FPTP with a system in which voters rank their choices on the ballot, although he has since said he is also open to some form of proportional representation (PR).

Under a ranked ballot, voters mark their first, second and subsequent choices. If no candidate wins more than 50 per cent of the vote, the contender with the fewest votes is dropped from the ballot and his or her supporters' second choices are counted. That continues until one candidate emerges with a majority.



QuoteI also don’t just claim to support the party because of the principles it advances. I actually do so.

Oh?

So you think the Constitution Party supports "ranked voting"?

https://www.constitutionparty.com/principles/platform-preamble/#ElectionReform

US Constitution, Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1:

“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature​​ thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing* Senators.”

The Constitutional balance of power on this matter has been destroyed by the 17th Amendment. The States no longer have a representative at the Federal level.**

The Constitution Party seeks the restoration of an electoral process that is controlled at the state and local level and is beyond manipulation by federal judges and bureaucrats. The federal government has unconstitutionally and unwisely preempted control in matters of district boundaries, electoral procedures, and campaign activities.

The Voting Rights Act should be repealed. The Federal Election Campaign Act, including its 1974 amendments, and the Federal Election Commission should be abolished.

Each citizen should have the right to seek public office in accordance with the qualifications set forth in federal and state constitutions.

Additional restrictions and obligations governing candidate eligibility and campaign procedures burden unconstitutionally the fairness and accountability of our political system.

To encourage free and fair elections, all candidates must be treated equally. We call for an end to designated "Major Party" status that gives an unfair advantage​​ to some candidates by providing ballot access and taxpayer dollars, while requiring others for the same office to gather petition signatures or meet other more stringent criteria.

We call for a repeal of all federal campaign finance laws (i.e. McCain- Feingold) due to their violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In order to avoid election fraud, we insist electronic and mechanical voting processes provide a clear, auditable and verifiable paper trail. At a minimum, elections should be​​ audited at random at the precinct level after the polls close.

There is a growing movement within the states and nation to undermine our right of a “Secret Ballot” by making people vote by absentee ballot. ​​ This move away from a “Secret Ballot” and “Vote-in-person” approach is an insecure system, not only because the Post office has been losing and misplacing mail for many years, but also because of increasing fraud and vote rigging, such as voter suppression, vote buying, and ballot box stuffing. Even though Vote- By-Mail seems to increase voting percentages in the short-term, it has proven to cause a long-term decline. Also verifying signatures “after the fact” greatly increases the cost of an election. Since true freedom requires being inconvenienced and​​ putting forth extra effort from time- to-time, we oppose any movement to codify or use Vote-By-Mail and other such schemes which undermine the liberty-preserving privilege of voting in secret, in person, at precinct-based polling places.

Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution states, in part:

"Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal​​ to the whole Number of Senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector."

This established the Electoral College.

The Constitution does not provide for the election of the President and Vice President of the United States by popular vote, but rather by the selection of “Electors” according to rules adopted by each state’s legislators. ​​ These electors would receive the list of certified candidates. They would then cast their vote for whomever they ascertained as best qualified to fill these two highest offices of trust with the federal government. The Constitution Party seeks a restoration of this electoral process for the choosing of the President and the Vice President of the United States.

Although the Constitution does not require the states to adhere to any specific manner in electing these electors or how they cast their votes, it suggests, by its wording, that prominent individuals from each congressional district, and from the state at large, would be elected or appointed as electors that represent that district. Under this arrangement, a voter would vote for three individuals, one​​ to represent his district and two "at large" representatives to represent his state. ​​ These electors, in turn, would then carefully and deliberately select the candidate for president. Under this system each congressional district could, in essence, select a different candidate. The candidate with the most electors nationwide would become the next president.

This was the general procedure used until the 1830's at which time all the states, except for South Carolina, changed to a "general ticket." The "general ticket" system is still in use today. Inherently, it causes corruption by the inequitable transfer of power from congressional districts to the states and large cities at the expense of rural communities.

The Constitution Party encourages states to eliminate the "general ticket" system and return to the procedure intended by the Framers. ​​ The so-called National Popular Vote is a dangerous threat to our Constitutional Republic, allowing as few as eighteen to twenty-one states to circumvent the Constitutional requirement of 38 states to amend the Constitution. The National Popular Vote process would effectively eliminate the last vestiges of the Electoral College as originally set forth in the United States Constitution. The National Popular Vote creates​​ a fake majority by forcing electors to vote against the votes cast by their own constituents.

The elimination of the Electoral College would overnight make irrelevant the votes of Americans in approximately 25 states because candidates would only be interested in campaigning in large population states making small states meaningless zeros. There is no threshold of what constitutes a “majority” under National Popular Vote. ​​ Therefore, a presidential candidate could be elected with as little as 15% of the popular vote. ​​ Under the National Popular Vote scheme, chaos would ensue in any close election. Under the Electoral College no single faction or region of the country can elect a president, ensuring broad representation across America.

The national Constitution Party opposes National Popular Vote and will work to defeat it in individual state legislatures.


Any thing there is this party you claim to support that suggests "ranked voting"?

QuoteWhile people like you are keyboard warrioring on here like blowhards to an audience of only yourself I actually have spent hundreds of hours working ballot access petitions, running information booths, on state and national meetings and platform committees and served as a state delegate to the national convention not to mention the actual monetary contributions over the years. The only reason I don’t post very specific details as proof is I don’t care to dox myself for rabid poop flingers or the mentally unbalanced and have to spend time in court after one of you mentally unstable nitwits causes me to have to defend myself in some way after being tracked down. I can use my time more productively than that.

I have no issue with your maintaining youir privacy, none at all. 8)

I do have MAJOR ISSUES with "ranked voting" and I do not for one moment believe the CP has interest in it. If so please let me know with clear citations here and I shall avoid them like the fucking plague!

QuoteYou aren’t familiar with tootsies antifa nonsense because you were quarantined in the neighboring territory because you consistently behave like an idiot.

Nope. I was zoo'd by Bart for calling that scummy leftard Tiger Lily aleftarded twat!

If you have other evidence than that please feel free to provide it.

QuoteThat’s why I don’t feel bad about a thing over here as far as toileting up threads is concerned. It’s already far beyond saving.

The faulty 'logic' of an utter and complete hypocrite.

Yep, as expected. >:(

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod