President Donald J. Trump

[Dr. MD MD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDEpKVC2u84

[ItsOver]

The Donald tells Time Magazine to fuck off.

http://www.libertyheadlines.com/trump-refuses-time-magazines-man-year/?AID=7236

A former Time editor, Richard Stengel, trolled Trump on the boast, saying the offer was likely a sign he wasn’t the top choice.

Richard Stengel
✔
@stengel
Hate to tell you but that PROBABLY means you’re NOT Person of the Year. They just wanted a photo shoot. But I’m sure you still have that fake TIME cover somewhere in storage. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/934189999045693441 …
6:12 PM - Nov 24, 2017

Political analyst @MSNBC. Former Under Secretary of State for @BarackObama, Editor @TIME and CEO of @ConstitutionCtr. Mandela-ographer.



Typical lib cock-sucker.  No sense of humor and you can still feel the ass-hat stinging from his bitch being butt-whipped last November.

[Gd5150]

A former Time editor, Richard Stengel, trolled Trump on the boast, saying the offer was likely a sign he wasn’t the top choice.

Richard Stengel
✔
@stengel
Hate to tell you but that PROBABLY means you’re NOT Person of the Year. They just wanted a photo shoot. But I’m sure you still have that fake TIME cover somewhere in storage. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/934189999045693441 …
6:12 PM - Nov 24, 2017

Political analyst @MSNBC. Former Under Secretary of State for @BarackObama, Editor @TIME and CEO of @ConstitutionCtr. Mandela-ographer.



Typical lib cock-sucker.  No sense of humor and you can still feel the ass-hat stinging from his bitch being butt-whipped last November.

It should either be Trump, because he’s been the biggest story all year, or it could be something to do with the sexual misconduct tsunami thanks to the demokkkrats in politics, news, and entertainment.

If it’s Trump the caption will be “illegitimate”. After all it’s leftwing Time Magazine.
If not Trump, it’ll be Mueller, in an attempt to rev up that dead investigation. Or it’ll be “the white male sexual predator” in a lame attemp to blame all white men for the sexual misconduct of powerful demokkkrats. This is how they work. There’s no one else to pick.

Wait got it, It’ll be a picture of Trump: with the caption “the year of the sexual predator”...nailed it. Bingo. Tadaaaa. Boom. Winner winner chicken dinner.

[Dr. MD MD]

It should either be Trump, because he’s been the biggest story all year, or it could be something to do with the sexual misconduct tsunami thanks to the demokkkrats in politics, news, and entertainment.

If it’s Trump the caption will be “illegitimate”. After all it’s leftwing Time Magazine.
If not Trump, it’ll be Mueller, in an attempt to rev up that dead investigation. Or it’ll be “the white male sexual predator” in a lame attemp to blame all white men for the sexual misconduct of powerful demokkkrats. This is how they work. There’s no one else to pick.

Wait got it, It’ll be a picture of Trump: with the caption “the year of the sexual predator”...nailed it. Bingo. Tadaaaa. Boom. Winner winner chicken dinner.

Damn! You should work for them. I bet that's how they'll spin it. 

[ItsOver]

It should either be Trump, because he’s been the biggest story all year, or it could be something to do with the sexual misconduct tsunami thanks to the demokkkrats in politics, news, and entertainment.

If it’s Trump the caption will be “illegitimate”. After all it’s leftwing Time Magazine.
If not Trump, it’ll be Mueller, in an attempt to rev up that dead investigation. Or it’ll be “the white male sexual predator” in a lame attemp to blame all white men for the sexual misconduct of powerful demokkkrats. This is how they work. There’s no one else to pick.

Wait got it, It’ll be a picture of Trump: with the caption “the year of the sexual predator”...nailed it. Bingo. Tadaaaa. Boom. Winner winner chicken dinner.

Ha!  Yep, something like that.  Or this.



Beyond despicable.

[Kidnostad3]

Damn! You should work for them. I bet that's how they'll spin it. 

Trump has a far better track record for being right about things than Time.  (No pun intended.)

[Dr. MD MD]

Trump has a far better track record for being right about things than Time.  (No pun intended.)

For sure! They made Hitler man of the year...twice!  :

[Kidnostad3]

Ha!  Yep, something like that.  Or this.



Beyond despicable.

He bears a striking resemblance to a Chia Pet.

[PB the Deplorable]

In that video you wouldn't watch Gary Katz asks the audience of CEOs and bankers at one point asks by a show of hands how many will be reinvesting their tax savings into capital assets for their companies? His response to this was How come there aren't more hands?! I'm still hoping for the best though. However, BO already proved that hoping for change doesn't work so well. 

Anything and everything a corporate exec, certainly a CEO, says publicly - or for that matter privately - influences investors.  Analysts and others are ever alert for any information they can get.  Anything they communicate is pored over by legal, marketing, etc, before it's put out there. 

If some CEO says, ''yeah, we plan to hire if we get a tax cut'', first of all it's taken as a bullish sign that the company is doing better than expected, whatever that previous expectation was, and second, if for some reason they don't end up following through and hiring people, that can be used for the basis of a law suit by investors who bought the stock and it didn't perform up to expectations.  On top of that, insider rules come into play - CEOs can't be telling one audience something without telling the rest of the marketplace at the same time.

This is why these companies have conference calls with analysts, investors, and anyone else who cares to join - in the morning, often before the market opens - when they are releasing their quarterly results.  There was no upside for them to raise their hands.  Anyone not being aware of that in advance shouldn't have been doing whatever this Gary Katz person was doing in the first place, and ''Jimmy'' is obviously out of his depth as well if he used it for some Marxist bullshit in his video instead of pointing out what I just posted.

How is it possible for people to not understand companies have more options - including expansion - if they have more money? 

[PB the Deplorable]

For some reason no one responded when I asked why they thought government would spend the money more wisely than the people who earned it.  Isn't that the premise for opposing tax cuts, and insisting that no one is going to hire more people if they get one (as if that's the only possible reason we should lower taxes)? 

No one responded regarding why the current attitude seems to be that the government owns everything, except the pittance they leave us with.  Isn't that the reason why government gets as much as they want, and allows us to keep whatever's left?

No one responded regarding why ever bigger government is preferred to the private sector.  Isn't that what we're really talking about here?

[PB the Deplorable]

We humans have spent the past at least 3000-4000 years trying to rid ourselves of kings, dictators, and various other forms of tyrants.  Our 13 original colonies, in a perfect storm of luck, temperment, governing philosophy, military prowess, and distance from the tyrant were able to throw it off and establish what is supposed to be a self governing republic. 

A republic founded on the premise that government should be small and as inobtrusive as possible.  That it should be responsible for the few things government is necessary for (for example diplomacy, national defense, internal security, court system, monetary system, rules to ensure fair dealings, immigration, and so on), with the individual being responsible for himself and free to pursue his own interests.  Including starting and building a business, with or without others.

How did we get from that to the point where businesses aren't entitled to their profits, and the rest of us get to decide how those profits should be used?


Of course there are always going to be elites who want to return us to dictatorship.  With themselves in charge.  And there will always be people who are duped into following them.  It's why I use '' '' around the term progressives.  They aren't progressive at all.  These are the people who would return us to tyranny with their demands for an ever larger government and ever more rules for them to govern us. 

That these people exist doesn't mean we have to join them.

[aldousburbank]

How did we get from that to the point where businesses aren't entitled to their profits, and the rest of us get to decide how those profits should be used?

[Dr. MD MD]

We humans have spent the past at least 3000-4000 years trying to rid ourselves of kings, dictators, and various other forms of tyrants.  Our 13 original colonies, in a perfect storm of luck, temperment, governing philosophy, military prowess, and distance from the tyrant were able to throw it off and establish what is supposed to be a self governing republic. 

A republic founded on the premise that government should be small and as inobtrusive as possible.  That it should be responsible for the few things government is necessary for (for example diplomacy, national defense, internal security, court system, monetary system, rules to ensure fair dealings, immigration, and so on), with the individual being responsible for himself and free to pursue his own interests.  Including starting and building a business, with or without others.

How did we get from that to the point where businesses aren't entitled to their profits, and the rest of us get to decide how those profits should be used?

Corruption and outright criminality mostly.

[PB the Deplorable]

The Donald tells Time Magazine to fuck off.

http://www.libertyheadlines.com/trump-refuses-time-magazines-man-year/?AID=7236

Did they need to do interviews and photo shoots when they named Hitler, Stalin, Khrushchev, Andropov, and Khomeini ''Man of the Year''?

[PB the Deplorable]

Time def has a fondness for evil dictators, they've even selected Bezos, Zuckerberg, and Obama.

[Spy]

The First Amendment in action on the Crowne plaza hotel in Atlanta.

[Gd5150]

How is it possible for people to not understand companies have more options - including expansion - if they have more money?

Well those that started the lie in media and education are pushing their left wing agenda so they’ll say anything. The lemmings who follow are incapable of thinking for themselves so they just follow orders like the good little lemmings they are.

If business doesn’t create more jobs with more money, then government doesn’t either. Therefore cut taxes anyways. It’s not the governments money.

[ItsOver]

Trump in action, supporting the second amendment.

"President Trump is set to sign the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, which contains an amendment that allows U.S. citizens to acquire military surplus 1911 pistols."

[Kidnostad3]

For some reason no one responded when I asked why they thought government would spend the money more wisely than the people who earned it.  Isn't that the premise for opposing tax cuts, and insisting that no one is going to hire more people if they get one (as if that's the only possible reason we should lower taxes)? 

No one responded regarding why the current attitude seems to be that the government owns everything, except the pittance they leave us with.  Isn't that the reason why government gets as much as they want, and allows us to keep whatever's left?

No one responded regarding why ever bigger government is preferred to the private sector.  Isn't that what we're really talking about here?

Concepts like the exchange of value for consideration as it applies to government are much too complex for the liberal mind without accompanying cartoon panels that include a talking mouse. 

[PB the Deplorable]

Concepts like the exchange of value for consideration as it applies to government are much too complex for the liberal mind without accompanying cartoon panels that include a talking mouse.

The Solyndra fiasco is an example of the ''Progressive'' Fascist idea of how the economy should work.

Government decides what industries to support.  Politically connected elites are given money taken from the real companies producing real products.  Oh yes, promises of jobs, for sure - promises that CEOs in the real world could well get their companies sued if they were to make such promises.

And boy did we get jobs.  Thousands of them.  For a short time.  And plenty of excessive executive pay for the incompetents running the show.  At a factory that produced nothing, and went bankrupt.  And Solyndra was one of many during the Obama years, just the biggest bust. 

If we had a real media, instead of the phony pretend one we have now, this is the sort of thing that would be discussed and used as an example, not buried while they bitch about tax cuts for those actually producing products and hiring people.  Which is to say real, permanent, jobs.

If Trump is short on scandals to investigate, running short on fraud to look into at the Obama White House (the awarding of half a trillion dollars to campaign donors for this boondaggle), this is another one to add to the list. 

[Kidnostad3]

The Solyndra fiasco is an example of the ''Progressive'' Fascist idea of how the economy should work.

Government decides what industries to support.  Politically connected elites are given money taken from the real companies producing real products.  Oh yes, promises of jobs, for sure - promises that CEOs in the real world could well get their companies sued if they were to make such promises.

And boy did we get jobs.  Thousands of them.  For a short time.  And plenty of excessive executive pay for the incompetents running the show.  At a factory that produced nothing, and went bankrupt.  And Solyndra was one of many during the Obama years, just the biggest bust. 

If we had a real media, instead of the phony pretend one we have now, this is the sort of thing that would be discussed and used as an example, not buried while they bitch about tax cuts for those actually producing products and hiring people.  Which is to say real, permanent, jobs.

If Trump is short on scandals to investigate, running short on fraud to look into at the Obama White House (the awarding of half a trillion dollars to campaign donors for this boondaggle), this is another one to add to the list.

Yeah, I remember Obama telling us all about the many “shovel ready projects” that never materialized and his saying some time later in his second term something like “well, they weren’t as shovel ready as we thought.”  The only thing his stimulus packages stimulated was the fattening of off-shore accounts.   

[Evil Twin Of Zen]

Solyndra
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solyndra

Special Report: The Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee to Solyndra, Inc.
https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/08/f26/11-0078-I.pdf

Solyndra archived
https://web.archive.org/web/20110923180725/http://www.solyndra.com/

[Spy]

Judge Roy Moore, serial sex offender Donald Trump's choice for the U.S. Senate. After all, it's better to have a pedophile in the U.S. Senate than a distinguished former U.S. Attorney who successfully prosecuted two of the KKK members for the murder of four school girls.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-doug-jones-criticism-kkk-alabama-church-bombing-1963-a8071876.html

[Spy]

Yeah, I remember Obama telling us all about the many “shovel ready projects” that never materialized and his saying some time later in his second term something like “well, they weren’t as shovel ready as we thought.”  The only thing his stimulus packages stimulated was the fattening of off-shore accounts.

Time for bed old man. Don't forget to take your meds and soak your dentures overnight. Be sure to pin your address to your jammies in case you wander off during the night and can't find your way home.

[Kidnostad3]

Time for bed old man. Don't forget to take your meds and soak your dentures overnight. Be sure to pin your address to your jammies in case you wander off during the night and can't find your way home.

I see you’re still stuck on stupid.  Do you think you’ll ever amount to anything?

[paladin1991]

Ha!  Yep, something like that.  Or this.



Beyond despicable.

Gay Quarterly.  When was the last time anyone other than a chick read this?

[paladin1991]

Trump in action, supporting the second amendment.

"President Trump is set to sign the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, which contains an amendment that allows U.S. citizens to acquire military surplus 1911 pistols."

I wonder how many are in the inventory?

[Swishypants]

Marines bought a bunch of nice ones several years back and are having to let them go.

[Jackstar]

Gay Jew Quarterly.

FTFY, goy

[PB the Deplorable]

Judge Roy Moore, serial sex offender Donald Trump's choice for the U.S. Senate...

Well, maybe the allegations are true and maybe they aren't.  One thing is clear, and that is the fake news media and the Democrat Party shouldn't get the benefit of the doubt on this, or anything else.

How many times have these same two groups put out unverified accusations about someone just before an election, or just before a confirmation hearing, or when they've been appointed to something - the person then loses the election or is denied the position, only for it to later be determined it was all a lie?  It should be embarassing to these people they can't win elections without lies and smears.

Besides that, how many Democrat officials have been protected for the very same thing - and much worse - than what is being alleged here.  Let's start with liberal hero Bill Clinton.  And his enabler Hilary Clinton.  Everyone knew Bill is a rapist and abuser, and that Hilary enabled him, yet they ran her for president anyway. 

Meanwhile, it's all hands on deck to protect the ''Progressive'' harassers and abusers currently already in office.  People who have done far worse than what Roy Moore is accused of

So please, spare me the phony sanctimony.