• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - PB the Deplorable

#18601
Quote from: The General on October 02, 2012, 12:21:14 PM
...  Perhaps it would be enlightening for them.  Unfortunately there is no need for them to do so, they have learned so well  that the only tactic needed is to demonize the right.  There is no need to familiarize yourself with the points of view ...

Imagine these people getting several decades or more into life and waking up one morning to realize everything they've been told and believed was ultimately a bunch of unworkable crap.
#18602
What we really need is to appoint a group of select few people to decide what each person should produce and how much of it.  This group would consist of the very smartest people - I think Obama is considered to be one of those, perhaps he would agree to lead the group.  They would then decide things like who gets what.  After these basics are established, they could expand and move on to perfect their system by setting the prices, deciding who was educated to what level and what classes they would take, deciding who would live where, who got promoted and who didn't, who would get what healthcare, who could come join our utopia and who could leave.  All decided based on the greater good. 

Of course there would be a few neanderthals that didn't agree with any of this and would criticize and even fight back, so a militia loyal to that small group of very smart people would have to be set up.  Because of the threat the neanderthals posed, this militia would have to be ruthless and think nothing of eliminating these threats to the general good.    To make their elimination easier, call them enemies of the people.

Just in case the kinks didn't get worked out right away and half the people starved, it would probably be best if the worst of the neanderthals were eliminated up front - the former businessmen, farmers, anyone with a college education, clergy, teachers,writers - all the successful people other than the small group of smart people in charge.  In case anyone was missed and fell through the cracks, we could get the young kids to rat their parents out.
#18603
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Jorch's Eye Pad.
October 02, 2012, 08:13:12 AM
[attachimg=1]
#18604
Random Topics / Re: Things That Annoy You
October 02, 2012, 01:30:59 AM
Quote from: eddie dean on October 01, 2012, 10:01:03 PM
sorry I have to change the topic here to vent.
these annoying NFL play-by-play commentators who are calling the football a "rock".
its been going on for a couple years now, but I just heard the ESPN MNF guys saying,
"he's running with the rock!" or "He took the rock for a big gain!"

come on man!
where did this come from? .......

"The football player on the New York 'Football' Giants football team is running the football down the sideline of the football field hoping he can carry that football all the way into the endzone and score the football."

Maybe some genius down at ESPN HQ suggested it might be a good idea to mix it up a little once in awhile.  Not realising it's still the same dumb announcers.
#18605
Radio and Podcasts / Re: George Knapp
October 01, 2012, 06:53:15 PM
Quote from: eddie dean on October 01, 2012, 06:40:23 PM
... That song will always remind me of the classic SNL bit "needs more cowbell"..


Haha, that reminds me of a conversation I once had with a colleague - he didn't realize there was actually a real band named Blue Oyster Cult, and I was unaware of the 'more cowbell' skits'...
#18606
Random Topics / Re: Things That Annoy You
October 01, 2012, 05:48:02 PM
Quote from: UFO Fill on October 01, 2012, 04:54:46 PM
Lame-assed, half-wit companies, such as my last employer, who just this year decided that it would be a great sales device to "Go Green."   And to do it by posting green symbols on the company website - not by actually doing anything.

I am constantly amazed and flabbergasted at decisions made by corporate America.  And to think American management is conidered the best in the world.
#18607
Radio and Podcasts / Re: George Knapp
October 01, 2012, 05:38:57 PM
Quote from: eddie dean on October 01, 2012, 04:47:59 PM
... I'm sure Noory would have dumped her after the first half hour and gone to open lines.
I recall several year back Noory had a guest on with a vocal issue,I think it was a stutter, and noory dumped him. He said "sorry we just can't do this interview, people cannot understand you".
Blamed his producer by saying 'my producer thinks we should move on to open lines' or something similar. I wish I could listen to that again. If anyone recalls the guest or date, please let me know.
Cruel bastard.

I felt bad for that woman's voice issues but she seemed like she had no problems with brain power


Just another example of George Noory exhibiting his nice guy schtick.  The brain power part is what gets most of Noorys' guests hung up on.
#18608
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Art Bell Quits Coast
October 01, 2012, 05:35:16 PM
There have been dubious attempts at intervening to change the sexual orientation of certain threads, but this has mostly been written off as quackery.
#18609
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Jorch's Eye Pad.
October 01, 2012, 01:01:35 AM
[attachimg=1]

[attachment deleted by admin]
#18610
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Jorch's Eye Pad.
September 30, 2012, 01:54:52 PM
[attachimg=1]
#18611
Quote from: Ben Shockley on September 30, 2012, 06:21:03 AM
... Taught by whom?  His White Kansas American grandparents?  Or were they part of the plan that went back to before his birth and got that fake birth announcement put in the Hawaii newspaper?

And even if he was a Moslem-- show me where in the Constitution that it says Moslems can't be President.   I believe it says that there shall be no religious test for any office under this Constitution.    Now let me see y'all twist THAT.

BTW-- P*B, I've been to Indonesia for an extended period and lived in the regular neighborhoods and ate the food and drank the water and all, and I came away as atheist as when I went there.  "The Muslim" didn't rub off on me, so you can probably erase that from your fantasy idea of "how Obama got infected with 'the Muslim.'"...

Wasn't he there as a young boy going to the public schools - which would have included religion classes?  His step-father at the time and that whole side of the family was Muslim.  Obama reguarly went to Mosque.

I don't think the Muslims in Indonesia at the time were radical crazies, even now most there aren't - but it is geting worse.  I just posted his personal history to support comments that he mave have a certain sympathy to them and might not be as convinced as to the threat they pose around the world now (if I hadn't, someone would have wanted to know when he got his exposure to it)

No there is not religious test, but voter are still allowed to take any and all information about candidates to use to make up their own minds.  I personally don't think a Muslim sympathiser that naively seems unaware of their intent (or worse) is the best choice right now.


Quote from: Ben Shockley on September 30, 2012, 06:21:03 AM
If she's a hyper-Muslim operative (still assuming that being a Muslim is illegal), then she's mighty stealthy, being married to a Jew  and all ~~

Oh, I guess that's just part of the über-deception, right?

I think Weiner is pretty much just a jerk, and maybe not all that bright.  I doubt she would tell him she is an undercover Brotherhood operative.  Actually the Leftists - and I assumeWeiner is one - don't seem to be too alarmed at all that these people are rapidly gaining influence in the Federal govt.  After all they have a common enemy - the rest of us. 

Bu I think he just found a hot chick he liked that would marry him, end of story.
#18612
.
Quote from: Zircon on September 29, 2012, 02:56:37 PM
... Nobody in the Muslim world was even aware of this video until when? A day or so before the incident in Egypt. The plans for the terrorist attack were planned at least many weeks before it took place in Libya...

Make that 'the rabble' wern't aware of it.  The people that plan these things knew of it - the video has apparently been out there for months.   While planning the 9/11 Anniversary attacks, they needed something easily accessable and easy to use, and they happened to use that video.  If it hadn't been that, it would have been something else.


Quote from: Zircon on September 29, 2012, 02:56:37 PM
... I don't think this administration anticipated such a widespread movement against [us]...


That's the problem with an Administration which strongly sympathises with the Muslims.  Obama grew up a Moslem, apparently had radical America-hating Moslem associates as a young man, may have them today (who is CAIR?, what does he know about Huma Abedin?, how close is he to the Moslem Brotherhood?).  He is just not able to comprehend the threat these people reperesent.  At best.
#18613
Random Topics / Re: Things That Annoy You
September 29, 2012, 08:04:37 PM
How about the refs putting the ball down just any place after a play - sometimes placing it a full yard or two away from where it should be, then if it's near a first down they come out and measure it oh so carefully.
#18614
Politics / Re: The Man of Steal
September 29, 2012, 12:17:42 PM
Quote from: Ruteger on September 29, 2012, 11:55:37 AM
The sadist in me wants to see the American People suffer - and greatly - should they vote Hussein another 4 years. Unfortunately, I would have to suffer the consequences along with the Hussein voters.

It's too bad that the Obama supporters won't be the only ones suffering under his economy.  It's too bad they won't be alone sufering the consequences of a bankrupt America and a ruined currency.  It's too bad they won't be the only ones with reduced living standards living in a country run like a weak sickly European Parlimentary Socialist country. 

It's not a lot different from the Democrat-appointed judges and Limosine Liberals being soft on crime while living in their gates communities, and inner city crime victims voting for more of it.

I'm never going to understand why poor people in the inner city vote for essentially more crime, less opportunity, and more poverty.  I don't get some of the rest of us doing it either.

#18615
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Jorch's Eye Pad.
September 29, 2012, 08:43:13 AM
[attachimg=1]
#18616
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Jorch's Eye Pad.
September 28, 2012, 11:46:26 PM
Quote from: The General on September 27, 2012, 01:28:08 PM
Would it be possible to incorporate Alex Jones into one of these installments?



[attachimg=1]
#18617
Politics / Re: The Man of Steal
September 28, 2012, 08:02:43 PM
Quote from: MV on September 27, 2012, 11:08:35 AM
perhaps obama didn't specifically articulate some of these ideas in a deliberate way and in the context of how you've chosen to frame this discussion, but:

1)... 10)...



this list could probably go on and on, but i don't have a lot of time these days.  my point is... any feigned shock at what obama has done as president seems to be exactly that: feigned.  don't tell me nobody saw this coming.  anyone who DIDN'T is either a: an idiot or b: was swept up in all of the hollow obama-mania or c: all of the above.  anyone who experienced even the most minute of exposure to mainstream media in 2008 would have been clued into the world view obama represents...

The elections are decided by people that aren't interested, don't care, don't pay attention - some combination of lousy schools and poor curriculum, and everyone telling these uninformed people that they should vote anyway. 

Sure, all that was out there for people to see - some didn't believe it or didn't want to believe it, others just thought it was the usual mudslinging and ignored it, still others only get their news from the Phony Media and didn't hear it that much at all.

Obama is pretty low key, unflappable, he speaks well (make that:  reads aloud well) - people like that in a President.  It was 'cool' to vote for him - everyone else was going to, and the media said so.  So yes, they were uninformed, maybe willingly so (as opposed to idiots), and swept up in Obama-mania.

The Ds shrewdly set up ObamaCare so the unpleasant parts don't kick in until 2013, so that's not energizing anyone now.

We'll have to see if anything is different this time around.

#18618
Radio and Podcasts / Re: opperation golem
September 28, 2012, 06:25:18 PM
Quote from: ziznak on September 28, 2012, 03:41:00 PM
... if we can come up with a severely CRAZY guest, ahem Steve Quayle, that has appeared numerous times being ya know... crazy...

Someone like that who will just keep talking as long as needed.   

Start of with the 'how arre yew', 'whatcha bin up-tuh since we last talked', how'd-juh git intneresch-ted in this', 'whatch nexcht fur yew' and all that.  Just wait for the next pause and play 'incredible', 'so true', 'riveting', 'amazing', 'good point', and all the rest, then repeat.  Maybe ask the same 10-12 questions George asked the last 15 times the person was on, then at the right time 'let'sch go to thuh calls', then hang up on the guy.. 

It would be just like an actual show.  It might even be what PremRat has been doing for the last 8 years.
#18619
Do signed stickers in a book really count as a signed copy?
#18620
Quote from: onan on September 28, 2012, 01:52:31 PM
... but I have never lost any sleep worrying about our government taking our guns.

No, not yet.  It would be a huge undertaking and I don't think it would go well at all.

Maybe if they kept a ballistics record on each gun so they would know what gun was fired in a given crime.  But they don't even seem to use all the spy cameras they have now to solve crimes, so I don't see them using any ballistics records they would conceivably collect...
#18621
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Jorch's Eye Pad.
September 28, 2012, 01:04:20 PM
Quote from: ItsOver on September 28, 2012, 12:52:15 PM
That's new to me.  Back feet?  Pockets in his tongue?  A forked tongue?  Oh, well, nothing Noory says surprises me.  What about mental defects?

He's always coming on and lying, making stuff up (note to PremRat):  opinion only) - the creepy personal stories, strange ideas, odd expereinces.  I think he gets defensive with all the criticism sometimes, and blurted that stuff about his tongue as explanations for his inability to speak well, maybe trying to get sympathy instead of scorn.  The knocking over chairs with his 'back feet' is just the usual Noorish poor usage of the language when he gets off his cue cards.
#18622
Quote from: Sardondi on September 28, 2012, 12:34:01 PM
As slight as it might be, George does get a tiny benefit of the doubt; and that's because of the fact George is living and hearing 7 seconds ahead of what we are. So there's the possibility, unlikely as it is, that he indeed heard something he knew would not pass muster, and so he hit the "profanity button" that skips the offending words on the playback we're hearing.

Or he was just a dickhead.

Or both.

He once said his delay was longer than the usual 7 seconds - and that makes sense as he is slower that other talk show hosts - it was something about 'crazies' and people that just wanted to talk about Art Bell. 

It would be an interesting experiment among the people still listening to call in, get on with George , and see what the delay is. 

#18623
Quote from: BobGrau on September 28, 2012, 07:30:28 AM

I hope I'm not coming across as offensive here. I support your 'right to choose' (not that my support matters), but guns need to be kept track of and gun owners need to be sensibly trained. I have the same opinion about dogs.

No, not at all, just a friendly exchange of ideas. 

We look at it as we are not subjects of the govt, they work for us.  We have the right to defend ourselves and are very suspicious regarding motives of 'the government' - that is straight from the Founders.

I'm all for training, maye we should offer it as a class in school similar to Drivers Ed, or get the training off campus privately but get class credits for it.  Self defense and martial arts too.  I think any law abiding citizen should be able to buy guns and carry them around openly or concealed.  Businesses would also have the right to say a person can't bring them inside.

All licenses do is tell the govt who has guns and where they are.  I might be missing something, but of what possible use is that information, other than to one day come collect all of them?
#18624
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Jorch's Eye Pad.
September 28, 2012, 11:36:35 AM
Quote from: ItsOver on September 28, 2012, 10:53:26 AM
Hahahahaha, PB!!!  Noory's tongue gets him in trouble, once again.  ;D

Heh, in case anyone missed the original shows or their reviews here, George once told a story about something - I don't remember what - and said "I was jumping over chairs and knocking them over with my back feet".

He has also claimed to have "pockets in his tongue" (whatever that even means) and "a forked tongue" as birth defects at various times.
#18625
Quote from: ziznak on September 28, 2012, 05:09:00 AM
... The guest will be speaking about something particularly riveting and building up to some sort of point that I'm waiting to hear about and then a break will happen, or George will interrupt with some stupid question... the guest ends up going down a completely different path and of course there's never any effort by our host to come back full circle... I HATE IT...

This is my number one complaint about George.  Well, this and his inability to ask the obvious follow up (which is related suckage).  I could live with all the rest, but not these.

Back before I realized he sucked so thoroughly, I sent him an email pointing it out to him that he was doing this, hoping he didn't realize it and would change.  He sent back an email that I thought was really strange at the time - he said I was a 'hater' and that there were only 6 or 7 of us and that we had nothing better to do, or something like that.

It wasn't until later that I typed 'Geroge Noory Sucks' into Google...
#18626
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Jorch's Eye Pad.
September 28, 2012, 01:15:15 AM
[attachimg=1]
#18627
Politics / Re: Leftism has invaded Liberalism
September 27, 2012, 09:10:21 PM
Quote from: Paper*Boy on September 26, 2012, 07:13:40 PM
The term 'Extreme Right Wing' is used often by the 'mainstream media'.   I don't ever remember hearing the term 'Exteme Left Wing' used by them to identify anyone or any group...

Quote from: Ben Shockley on September 27, 2012, 10:41:12 AM
You hear a lot about murders and tornadoes  in the "mainstream media," because 1) those things exist, and 2) they have a pretty negative impact on society.

You also don't hear much about unicorns  and fairies  in the "mainstream media," because, even if they exist, they don't seem to have much impact on society.


So when a Leprechaun (?) or whatever he is such as 'The Rev' Al Sharpton whips up a mob into a fury to the point they murder shopkepers and Jews, are you saying that's not extreme, or that it doesn't have a big enough impact?

How about the Unicorns over at ELF or PETA where they spike trees or follow people to their homes for the purpose of attacking or intimidatng them?

Haven't the Fairies at Occupy caused enough trouble to qualify as 'impacting' society?  The murders, the rapes, the attack on cops, the burning, looting, dog bites, drug dealing, taking public parks for themselves?  It wasn't enough when some of them were caught red-handed on their way to blowing up a bridge?

What sort of imaginative creatures are the 'Rev' Wright and his Black Liberation American-hating colleagues - the ones filling black churches with race hate, or 60s terrorists Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers profiting on their connection with Obama out on the speaking circuit gloating about their terrorism and confessing they are just sorry they didn't do more?  Have you read some of the comments of Valerie Jarrett, David Axlerod, Vann Jones, Rahm Emanuel?  How about some of the jucier tidbits from the the Progressive Caucus or the Congressional Black Caucus?

Are you kidding me?  I could type until my fingers are bleeding pointing out who the Left-wing extremists are and what they are doing to qualify.  Does Kim Jong-Un count, I'd imagine he's built up quite the body count by now, or how about his father and grandfather - or are we keeping this just to extreme Left-wing Americans?   To date Left-wing extremists like Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot and the Kims are responsible for what, 150 million deaths?  Not enough to qualify as extreme?  Or to impact society?  Maybe they were actually Right-wingers?  Or was what they did necessary with understandable 'mistakes' made?

Just face it - to the Phony Media nothing the Left can do is 'Extreme', it's simply necessary to move us along.  Just 'Bumps in the road', as Obama woud say.  But the rest of us recognize it.

By the way, why don't you post a list of who you think they Right-wing extremists are and what they've done. 
#18628
Politics / Re: Leftism has invaded Liberalism
September 27, 2012, 08:13:43 PM
Quote from: MV on September 27, 2012, 03:46:38 PM

people like rush (and to a lesser degree hannity who is a hack and was late to the meeting anyway) would love themselves to be perceived as heading a "movement" of sorts, when in reality they are the establishment and they represent it well.  i think their listeners have slowly begun to detect this, particularly after 8 years of bush.  if you have as much experience listening to rush as i do, the overall tone and approach his supposedly like minded callers take seems to have changed drastically since the 1990s.  with the evolution of politics over the last decade and the establishment republican party's evolving positions within those changes, i think it's getting harder for rush's show to find conservative callers who believe "rush is fighting for the good guys" every time he defends the republican party...

I hardly ever get a chance to listen to Rush or Sean Hannity.  Who has time in the middle of the day.  I've liked what I've heard though.

I've heard both criticize Bush II lots of times - for the spending, for the way the wars were conducted, and Rush criticize Bush I back before Hannity was on the air.  They were pretty rough on McCain too.  I've even heard their disapointments with Reagan.  Lots of other Rs.  I have to believe they were critical on other occasions when I wasn't listening.  But they do defend them against unfair attacks.  They were totally on that side of things during elections when the opponents were Clinton, Gore, Kerry, and Obama - and so was I.

None of that meant they were in the tank for the corporate Republican elitists or anyone else.  I'd say they are more like me, choosing the lesser of the 2 evils at times, and pointing out the reasons we shouldn't elect the greater of the two evils.

#18629
Politics / Re: The Man of Steal
September 27, 2012, 07:53:37 PM
Quote from: Ben Shockley on September 27, 2012, 03:07:45 PM
Maybe some of you can explain something to me:

If you believe that Obama is committed to the destruction of this nation, and if you assume that he is aware that there is a highly-mobilized segment of the populace determined to stop him, why do you suppose he would wait until his second and last term in office to put the plan seriously in motion?   Doing that exposes him to a second chance of "the sheeple" waking up and electorally stopping him.

If you assume that part of Obama's agenda is the ending of constitutional limitations on presidential power and the installation of himself as absolute dictator of the U.S. --which, as best I can tell, is what you folks are expecting-- what is he waiting for?   If he's going to declare himself dictator after the election, why do you suppose that he doesn't just skip a step and do the self-coronation now?   Why didn't he do it in January 2009?

Overall, what I'm asking is: if you assume that Obama is committed to destroying, and is single-handedly able to destroy, constitutional government in the U.S., why do you also assume that he is fooling around with what is ultimately a bunch of wasted time called "electoral politics?"

I'm sure he would love to.  One can't simply just 'decide' to do it.  The situation and timing have to be right.  What, you thought everyone that wanted to be a dictator just walked in and announced they were taking over?  And it worked?

One of the good things - or should I say fortunate things - about Obama is that he is more weak than ruthless.  If a situation presented itself, a more ruthless person might try to take advantage, where a more cautious Obama might wait for a more favorable situation.


Do you think Gandhi's method would have gotten rid of anyone in any period, or was it because it was the British, at the right time, and having the right situation?  Why didn't the Tian-a-men Square protestors prevail instead of being run over by tanks?



Quote from: Ben Shockley on September 27, 2012, 03:07:45 PM
EXTRA CREDIT
If your answer to the question of "what's he waiting for?" primarily has to do with "laying the groundwork," please detail for me exactly what groundwork has been laid.   In particular, detail what you perceive as infrastructure and mechanisms of material support that are likely to serve any "people's revolutionary army," "Obama brigades," or other potential/purported organs of armed coercive power that would be directly loyal to Obama and that would be necessary to facilitate and defend his takeover against resistance from military organs loyal to the existing Constitution.

I didn't answer 'groundwork', although that would be part of any plan to create a favorable situation which could be used.  How about bankrupting the country?  How about his comments and actions that create economic uncertainty - which keep businesses from expanding, investing, buying inventory, hiring people?  How about emboldening more terrorism by catering to the Islamists and standing by when they steal the 'Arab Spring' revolutions?  How about projecting weakness with the hope Russia or China miscalculate and we are manuevered into some sort of confrontation?  How about loading up the Supreme Court so incredibly destructive and un-Constitutional items like ObamaCare make it through?  Infiltrate the government and military with Jihadis?  With hard Leftists?  More racial division?  Class warfare? 

Sounds like 'groundwork' to me.

Obama brigades?  I recently pointed out who they would be, at least in past, and you even responded to that post.  For starters, they include Acorn, SEIU, Occupy, TSA.  Should I potentially add homegrown inner city gangs and the Latino gangs? - they seem to be happy to work with anyone for cash.  Pretty sure terorist cells could be either set up or existing ones utilized if one has the right connections.  How many 'demonstrators' could be rallied to fill the streets?  I can picture military forces being confused and either siding with the sitting President or being disarmed and neutralized in their barracks, the rest stranded overseas - surprise would be on the side of the planners.  Soros could fund much of this early on. Do we know where all the cash the Fed is printing is going?

And don't discount the media that sides with Obama now, and turning off other outlets like radio and the internet.  Same as any other coup.

Don't misunderstand - I don't expect this to play out, I'm just answering your question about how it could be done.
#18630
Politics / Re: The Man of Steal
September 27, 2012, 07:06:24 PM
Quote from: Ben Shockley on September 27, 2012, 05:01:15 PM
I was joking...

Sure didn't seem like it.  It was in nearly every post there for awhile.  The 'it was a joke' excuse sure seems popular when people get nailed, it's actually refreshing when people just own it instead.  But ok, you were just joking, no prob. 

Unfortunately there are way too many people using this very tactic to shut down debate.


Quote from: Ben Shockley on September 27, 2012, 05:01:15 PM
... Ya see, after all, I was only mockingly making reference to anti-Obama types who predictably and consistently [use naked proxy terms to] inject the president's racial extraction into [their apocalyptic political rhetoric to amp-up the primal fear for political] leverage...

I'm not sure anyone here was doing that.  Why not just point it out when you think you see it.


Quote from: Ben Shockley on September 27, 2012, 05:01:15 PM
... So, because of my attempt to mock electoral racism, someday someone who otherwise was ready to vote for a particular Black candidate is going to say "Wait a minute!  I remember some mo-fo online calling himself Shockley who was mocking people who would never vote for a Black guy.   But since I have decided to vote for a Black guy, I'm personally offended by Shockley's mockery.   So now, just to fuck with Shockley for mocking people who aren't like me --and despite the fact that he'll never know this-- I'm going to forget all my own political analyses and opinions and stay home today and not vote for Candidate X."
Really?


It goes something more like:  "The Democrats can't handle having anyone other than a straight white male in the White House.  If anyone else is elected, any criticism or disagreement will be treated as racist, sexist, or homophobic (whichever applies).  Our government of self rule depends on our ability to critize and disagree with elected officials and if we can't do that without being personally attacked in the most vile terms, then maybe those Liberals and therefore the Nation is not ready to elect such a person".  And that would really sad.

Hope that helps.


Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod