Fukushima meltdown?

[mikuthing01]

He seems to think any video posted on You Tube is a hoax. He's totally out of touch and deluded. 

It was a tribute song that Buckethead did for the 2011 tsunami it gives me feels every time i hear it and i hope it don't happen to that extent again.

[Yorkshire pud]

It was a tribute song that Buckethead did for the 2011 tsunami it gives me feels every time i hear it and i hope it don't happen to that extent again.

It gives you feels? What the hell are you talking about?

[mikuthing01]

It gives you feels? What the hell are you talking about?

I forgot you were old, google Wojak grandpa

[Yorkshire pud]

I forgot you were old, google Wojak grandpa

It'll be better for all if you speak English, or American, if English is too much of a stretch.

[WOTR]

It'll be better for all if you speak English, or American, if English is too much of a stretch.

[mikuthing01]

Tsunami warning downgraded to advisory

Praise Kami-sama!

[albrecht]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/14/fishermen-express-fury-fukushima-plant-set-release-radioactive/

[Gd5150]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/14/fishermen-express-fury-fukushima-plant-set-release-radioactive/

What insanity. That plume will go all throughout the Pacific. If tritium is so harmless then keeping it in tanks or inventing a way to filter it out won't take them long. Wait disregard this story, it's not important, someone just had a vodka, call for a special prosecutor.

[Hog]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/14/fishermen-express-fury-fukushima-plant-set-release-radioactive/

In January 2014 it was made public that a total of 875 trillion becquerel (Bq) of tritium are on the site of Fukushima Daiichi; it would take 59 years to safely discharge this amount of tritium to the sea. According to data that TEPCO submitted to the tritium task force (of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), the 400,000 tonnes of contaminated water stored in tanks at the site contained a total of about 817 trillion Bq of tritium. A further 58 trillion Bq of tritium was contained in water outside of the tanks, e.g. in reactor buildings.

According to Professor Akio Koyama of the Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, the density of high-level decontaminated water was believed to contain some 10 billion becquerels per liter, but if this is condensed to polluted sludge and zeolites, this density could increase 10,000 fold. These densities could not be dealt using conventional systems.


my M79 rifle/gun sights were Tritium illuminated.  Such a pretty glow.

peace
Hog

[Evil Twin Of Zen]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhEZ2w_yQjU

[Up All Night]

Does the Asian Boss interviewer have any porn??

[Rix Gins]

A couple years back the Japanese designed a small, four wheeled cart thing with a camera to crawl under the storage tanks and check for radioactive leakage.  Not remote, they had a long cord attached to it.  Anyway, it relayed some video of the leakage.  A couple of leaks were slow drops but one was dribbling away pretty steadily.  All of the leaks were highly radioactive.  They didn't say what they did with the little car.  Cut the cord and left it there?  And if they did reel it back in, who got the job of cleaning the thing up? 

[Beelzebubbelah]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/14/fishermen-express-fury-fukushima-plant-set-release-radioactive/

'Allo!
With you yet am i.
Here's some updated info.
"B_B"
PS:No Logo:
"][ 7VF ]["
====================================================
[http://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/hanford/article204246894.html]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Ah, Come On, Man, Someone* Would Have Said Something.”
Posted on March 17, 2018 by MVB
*Not me.

I wouldn’t.  Why would I?

See… Okay, let’s use a hypothetical incident… like… um… Okay, here:

Let’s assume… that a large radioactive plume escaped from a mystery nuclear facility somewhere.   You read about it or heard of it in the mainstream news.  It was reported on in various outlets you consider trustworthy, including award-winning newspapers with what you believe is a well-established track record of journalistic integrity. These mainstream media outlets reported, practically verbatim, what nuclear watchdogs told them in a press release.  The nuclear watchdogs are staffed by credentialed scientists, and trusted by elected officials, as well as big names in the world of physics.  Let’s pretend they told us something along the lines of, “Hey, check this out, we [of such and such nuclear watchdog agencies] found Ruthenium-106 in the air at various locations across Europe during the last week of September and first week of October.  Here’s the details: We know it can’t have come from an active nuclear reactor, because a leak from an active reactor would also include other radioisotopes, such as Iodine-131, which would be tell-tale sign of recent fission.  And at the very least we would definitely also see a significant uptick for Cesium-137, and probably Cs-134.  And more pronounced traces of many others as well, including upticks of ‘enhanced naturals”, from Be-7 to Na-22, even Pb-210, etc.  Because none of these were present outside of normal variability, our best guess is that the radioactive cloud must have leaked from â€" not a reactor, but- likely some kind of nuclear waste processing facility.   Because such waste is already cooled-down, if there’s a leak, it doesn’t rise stratospheric-high like the hot volatile particles and gasses than come off a hot nuclear reactor do.  That’s why we could trace this cloud with just slow-moving surface winds to what we think is almost certainly the facility it came from.   Here’s the probability map [shows map], and in the most likely area we do in fact find a facility that is already notorious for environmental pollution.”

Of course this is EXACTLY what happened [with the French IRSN braking the story, and various ‘experts’ soon pitching in and pointing at Mayak in Russia, see here and here, among other blogposts], but let’s not get carried away by facts.  For now, let’s just approach the just-described as hypothetical.  Forget about what actually happened; just PRETEND the described is what happened.  Okay?  Alright…

Now let’s just invent a fictional character, let’s say: a blogger somewhere in a remote part of the Colorado Mountains, who began scrutinizing radiation data after the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear catastrophe began in Japan in spring 2011.  Off and on he still looks at the data available online.  He reads and hears these mainstream articles and thinks to himself, “Hm…  It shouldn’t, but… let’s see if this beta-emitter Ru-106 leaves a signature on any gamma monitors.”  And as he’s checking gamma monitors, and finding mostly strangely timed data gaps around that time all over the map, he checks a couple radioisotope-specific monitors too.  What he finds at first puzzles him: there were significant detections in Czech Republic, Finland, Estonia, Switzerland,…  Strange they wouldn’t mention a word about these…  And the more he looks, the more he gets the impression that the official story is simply wrong:  Gamma and other monitors show widespread data gaps around the same time over vast distances.  And most strikingly, exactly around the same time as the Ru-106 detections (last week of September, first week of October), there were also upticks of various other artificial radioisotopes, including Cs-137, Cs134 and I-131, some even as ‘significant spikes’.  Let’s say he documented and shared the data, with all the sources where that data can be found.

He wonders about it:  With Cs-137 & I-131 as apparently a significant part of this radioactive cloud, it MUST have come from an active reactor!   And thus it was hot and cannot be simply traced upwind to its source with surface winds.  It might have come from somewhere else entirely:  an active nuclear reactor, and in that case the fallout was more likely ALSO distributed by the jet stream much higher, starting somewhere… perhaps more likely in Western Europe or much further, perhaps in North America somewhere.  (Or even further, of course.)  Bottom line of his discoveries is simple: the official narrative, from the detected, its implications about its origin, to the most-likely source location, falls apart upon scrutiny.

He tells a couple friends that he suspects a major nuclear accident must have happened somewhere and that he’s convinced that officials are actively covering it up, including with what he begins to believe are intentional ‘diversion stories’ that ALL media outlets carry without any questioning.

I’m interrupted.  My friend does not find the hypothetical story believable:

“Ah, Come on, man, someone would have said something.  Someone either with measuring equipment would have posted their contradictory data on an easily accessible data exchange platform, and any reporter doing a quick fact check, or even just someone monitoring the monitoring data would figure out they’re lying.  With today’s communication means, you can’t keep such a thing a secret.  It’s not 1986 anymore, you know?  You can start a blog or open a twitter or facebook account in a matter of minutes and make the story available for the whole world to see.  I mean… Come on, man, someone would have said something!”

He’s got a point.

Not sure where I was trying to go with that story…
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/radioactivity/fukushima-hanford-blogposts/]
Nuclear Blog Posts Archive
This page serves as the easy-access archive for my nuclear-related blogposts, published during the 7 year ‘nuclear period’ (March 2011-2018) of this blog.  More noteworthy ones are bold or marked with “!â€">“.

Pages in the Nuclear tab include:
!â€">  Radiation Units & Conversions
!â€"> Online radiation Monitors   [will not be updated]
(that’s this page â€" see below, re-named Nuclear Blogposts Archive)
!-> Nuclear News Links  [will not be updated]
Radiation Exposure Effects (left unfinished)
Geiger Counters, etc. (LIST)  (outdated)
Remember Chernobyl (left unfinished)
Nuclear Blogposts Archive
Most recent at the top.  Last Updated: March 30, 2018.  If you click on a blogpost and it isn’t there, please let me know. Thanks.  [Embedded videos may become dead-end/obsolete or censored.  Nothing I can do about that.]

â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€" “ The End “â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"â€"

Jan. 4, 2016:  January 4, 2016 â€" A mix (Photos, Weather, Climate,… (+ ! Estonia & Latvia mystery RADIATION SPIKE))
...
The Fukushima-Dai-ichi Nuclear Disaster began on March 11, 2011
I added this static page in early 2014.  I intent to update it when I feel like it.  DISCLAIMER.
All Contents © Michael Van Broekhoven, All Rights Reserved.
====================================================
[http://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/hanford/article199668254.html]
====================================================