The General Musings of Falkie2013 (George Senda, The Guy From Pittsburgh)

[paladin1991]

Did this guy do a video on the free dinners offered at the local homeless shelter?  Or was he eating semi cooked chickens again.  Is he still alive?

[Lilith]

Did this guy do a video on the free dinners offered at the local homeless shelter?  Or was he eating semi cooked chickens again.  Is he still alive?

I don't know, but he hasn't uploaded anything yet.

[whoozit]

Did he forget to put on his underpants?

I’d run away if I were his underpants.  Assuming I could still bend and wasn’t totally “starched” stiff.

[Jackstar]

context behind 9/11


"There are some people who realize that the physical evidence indicates that the official story is wrong, but don't understand what purpose or interest the government may have had in carrying out the attacks and thus have a psychological relation to the entire event as remaining quite mysterious even though the government's claims are patently absurd. I'll resolve that for you.

On 9/11/91 Bush Sr. spoke before Congress calling for a new world order. Alright, so the president is announcing a major initiative to the world. What could he be up to?

As the USSR was collapsing, there were major operations underway to seize control of their industry. We need to lay down a little historical context for those unaware before proceeding.

Throughout the 1980s the CIA was heavily involved in cocaine and arms trafficking, money laundering, etc. The most famous name here might be Oliver North, but Bush Sr. is neck deep. Mena, Arkansas is a major hub for this operation under the jurisdiction of Bill Clinton. Long trail of deaths surrounding North, Clinton, Bush, Mena, etc. You can educate yourself on those details.

This scandal goes mainstream around 1986. In 1989 you get the first major form of collateralized debt obligations in the form of Brady Bonds, invented by Bush Sr.'s treasury secretary. Minimally informed people are aware of the centrality of CDOs to the 2008 financial panic and the endemic fraud to securities trades of this type.

One of the Bush/North associates is Neil Livingstone, who acts as a go between to Semion Mogilevich. Mogilevich is one of the biggest mafia leaders in the USSR at the time. Mogilevich has had money laundering through the Bank of New York exposed to the tune of $10 billion. He is a major arms dealer at the time, and also heavily connected to al-Qaeda. Part of a bargain Livingstone tried to broker with DoJ involved Mogilevich handing over a bunch of his al-Qaeda connections.

Around 9/11/91 a bunch of fraudulent Brady Bonds are issued through the Bank of New York, Mogilevich's personal money laundering machine. This manifests ten years later. If you go back and look at the settlement imbalances at banks after 9/11, even the banks operating out of WTC complexes don't have any real settlement issues. There is one major exception however: Mogilevich's money laundering hub, the Bank of New York, is reporting book imbalances in excess of $100 billion per day following the attacks. The rules governing security clearance were lifted immediately after 9/11 - allegedly due to widespread problems - but really just to allow BoNY to clear it's balances without a record. It's worth noting that BoNY did not sustain structural damage on 9/11 - not in the WTC.

So these 100s of billions of fraudulent securities that were not clearing in the days after 9/11 - where did they come from? What were they used for? This is how the west launched their invasion of Russia following the collapse. You'll find exposes about crates of freshly printed US bills being shipped to Russia like The Money Plane in NY Magazine, used to buy influence; the other side of this is the securities fraud used to buy assets. It's estimated that something like 40-50% of Russia had been bought up through the mafia by late 92 or 1993.

In 2000/2001 Putin comes onto the scene. He starts nationalizing Russian assets that were seized by the US via the above mentioned securities fraud / money laundering and putting pressure on the mob. Next thing you know 9/11 happens. There are a lot of bones to pick with the official story, but rather than taking up those issues I'd like to highlight the importance of some officially acknowledged but underreported facts.

On 9/9/01 Ahmad Massoud is assassinated by a fake TV crew that disguised a bomb as a TV camera. Two days later the secret service denies access to a couple of guys claiming to have an interview lined up with Bush in Florida on the morning of 9/11. This is our first direct threat against Bush of the day and indication of some larger plot than hijacked planes. Upon learning of the attacks, Bush insists on returning directly to Washington. In flight, a threat is received in the form of a call from an unknown source saying "Angel is next," angel being code for the president that only insiders would have. (* "Can you confirm the substance of that threat that was telephoned in…that Air Force One is next and using code words?" Fleischer: "Yes, I can. That's correct."(September 13)* )Bush is at this point aware that there is some sort of coup effort going on; for example, all the reporter's onboard AF1 are required to turn their cellphones off because they are worried about the attacking faction tracking cell signals - a capability we can all agree is well beyond that of al-Qaeda.

So Bush is under threat from people with high level insider knowledge. Press secretary acknowledged all this on national TV the day after (Angel is next being called in). Bush diverts to Barksdale which is basically the #2 nuclear command site. After a couple hours there he proceeds to Offutt, which is the #1 nuclear command site. You should also be aware of a variety of drills running on the day of 9/11, Vigilant Guardian. This is a full scale mock up of nuclear war; the whole infrastructure is activated for first strike (incidentally, part of the Vigilant Guardian drill in 2001 included a hijacking of planes as the instigator of the conflict). So what is Bush doing going to Barksdale and Offutt? Clearly trying to bring the nuclear forces to heel in light of learning of high level insider power plays.

This might be starting to sound a bit over the top - high level insiders seizing control of nuclear infrastructure and threatening the president with it. But only a few years later we have a similar incident in 2007 as 6 nuclear weapons are seized, generally regarded as intended for use starting the war in either Iran or Georgia. Later, in 2013, we again have nukes going off base unauthorized. Hours after it was reported in the media Sen. Graham is on TV warning of a nuke hit on South Carolina to be blamed on Syrian rebels; two of top nuclear commanders get dismissed in the following weeks. So high level insider fighting over the nuclear arsenal is pretty standard stuff, well known to the public.

With the question of a struggle over the nuclear arsenal now being common sense rather than shocking, we consider Bush caving to the terrorism line and starting the whole war on terror. You have Putin immediately backing off the seizure of assets in Russia. It won't be until the last couple of years that Putin resumes his assertion of authority over Russia; the US responds in kind with attacks on Syria and Ukraine but Russia has since quietly updated it's missile program and is prepared for nuclear war this time around; you now see a defiant Putin in the face of the 9/11 coup faction. Alongside this remarkable shift in geopolitics, there is an emerging anti-dollar block with the BRIC countries establishing an infrastructure bank last year. Just weeks ago, Glazyev announced this and is widely regarded as being the mouth of Putin; he organized the recent gas deal with Chin for example.

So you see 9/11 was a pivotal event used to extend the US dollar empire under threat of nuclear war for another 10-15 years in the face of an assertive Putin back in 2001 and growing domestic problems for the US Government. (You may recall the 90s was full of anti government militancy, concern over globalization, NAFTA, extraordinary distrust, in general what you would expect of citizens in an empire with no apparent external threat … the cold war had ended)

So now that broad outline of purpose and motivation for 9/11 is clear, it's easier to come to terms with what your eyes tell you looking at Building 7 implode into its foot print at free fall for example. You don't even necessarily have to view it as an evil thing; the US people are quite severely fucked without something being done to backstop the US dollar."


source: some chanfag

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

Some guy with a conspiracy boner telling us how to think about people who are telling us how to think

BUSH: So, what's the plan again?

CHENEY: Well, we need to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. So what we've decided to do is crash a whole bunch of remote-controlled planes into Wall Street and the Pentagon, say they're real hijacked commercial planes, and blame it on the towelheads; then we'll just blow up the buildings ourselves to make sure they actually fall down.

RUMSFELD: Right! And we'll make sure that some of the hijackers are agents of Saddam Hussein! That way we'll have no problem getting the public to buy the invasion.

CHENEY: No, Don, we won't.

RUMSFELD: We won't?

CHENEY: No, that's too obvious. We'll make the hijackers Al Qaeda and then just imply a connection to Iraq.

RUMSFELD: But if we're just making up the whole thing, why not just put Saddam's fingerprints on the attack?

CHENEY: (sighing) It just has to be this way, Dick. Ups the ante, as it were. This way, we're not insulated if things go wrong in Iraq. Gives us incentive to get the invasion right the first time around.

BUSH: I'm a total idiot who can barely read, so I'll buy that. But I've got a question. Why do we need to crash planes into the Towers at all? Since everyone knows terrorists already tried to blow up that building complex from the ground up once, why don't we just blow it up like we plan to anyway, and blame the bombs on the terrorists?

RUMSFELD: Mr. President, you don't understand. It's much better to sneak into the buildings ourselves in the days before the attacks, plant the bombs and then make it look like it was exploding planes that brought the buildings down. That way, we involve more people in the plot, stand a much greater chance of being exposed and needlessly complicate everything!

CHENEY: Of course, just toppling the Twin Towers will never be enough. No one would give us the war mandate we need if we just blow up the Towers. Clearly, we also need to shoot a missile at a small corner of the Pentagon to create a mightily underpublicized additional symbol of international terrorism -- and then, obviously, we need to fake a plane crash in the middle of fucking nowhere in rural Pennsylvania.

RUMSFELD: Yeah, it goes without saying that the level of public outrage will not be sufficient without that crash in the middle of fucking nowhere.

CHENEY: And the Pentagon crash -- we'll have to do it in broad daylight and say it was a plane, even though it'll really be a cruise missile.

BUSH: Wait, why do we have to use a missile?

CHENEY: Because it's much easier to shoot a missile and say it was a plane. It's not easy to steer a real passenger plane into the Pentagon. Planes are hard to come by.

BUSH: But aren't we using two planes for the Twin Towers?

CHENEY: Mr. President, you're missing the point. With the Pentagon, we use a missile, and say it was a plane.

BUSH: Right, but I'm saying, why don't we just use a plane and say it was a plane? We'll be doing that with the Twin Towers, right?

CHENEY: Right, but in this case, we use a missile. (Throws hands up in frustration) Don, can you help me out here?

RUMSFELD: Mr. President, in Washington, we use a missile because it's sneakier that way. Using an actual plane would be too obvious, even though we'll be doing just that in New York.

BUSH: Oh, OK.

RUMSFELD: The other good thing about saying that it was a passenger jet is that that way, we have to invent a few hundred fictional victims and account for a nonexistent missing crew and plane. It's always better when you leave more cover story to invent, more legwork to do and more possible holes to investigate. Doubt, legwork and possible exposure -- you can't pull off any good conspiracy without them.

BUSH: You guys are brilliant! Because if there's one thing about Americans -- they won't let a president go to war without a damn good reason. How could we ever get the media, the corporate world and our military to endorse an invasion of a secular Iraqi state unless we faked an attack against New York at the hands of a bunch of Saudi religious radicals? Why, they'd never buy it. Look at how hard it was to get us into Vietnam, Iraq the last time, Kosovo?

CHENEY: Like pulling teeth!

RUMSFELD: Well, I'm sold on the idea. Let's call the Joint Chiefs, the FAA, the New York and Washington, D.C., fire departments, Rudy Giuliani, all three networks, the families of a thousand fictional airline victims, MI5, the FBI, FEMA, the NYPD, Larry Eagleburger, Osama bin Laden, Noam Chomsky and the fifty thousand other people we'll need to pull this off. There isn't a moment to lose!

BUSH: Don't forget to call all of those Wall Street hotshots who donated $100 million to our last campaign. They'll be thrilled to know that we'll be targeting them for execution as part of our thousand-tentacled modern-day bonehead Reichstag scheme! After all, if we're going to make martyrs -- why not make them out of our campaign paymasters? Shit, didn't the Merrill Lynch guys say they needed a refurbishing in their New York offices?

RUMSFELD: Oh, they'll get a refurbishing, all right. Just in time for the "Big Wedding"!

ALL THREE: (cackling) Mwah-hah-hah!

source: Rolling Stone

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

[Dr. MD MD]

BUSH: So, what's the plan again?

CHENEY: Well, we need to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. So what we've decided to do is crash a whole bunch of remote-controlled planes into Wall Street and the Pentagon, say they're real hijacked commercial planes, and blame it on the towelheads; then we'll just blow up the buildings ourselves to make sure they actually fall down.

RUMSFELD: Right! And we'll make sure that some of the hijackers are agents of Saddam Hussein! That way we'll have no problem getting the public to buy the invasion.

CHENEY: No, Don, we won't.

RUMSFELD: We won't?

CHENEY: No, that's too obvious. We'll make the hijackers Al Qaeda and then just imply a connection to Iraq.

RUMSFELD: But if we're just making up the whole thing, why not just put Saddam's fingerprints on the attack?

CHENEY: (sighing) It just has to be this way, Dick. Ups the ante, as it were. This way, we're not insulated if things go wrong in Iraq. Gives us incentive to get the invasion right the first time around.

BUSH: I'm a total idiot who can barely read, so I'll buy that. But I've got a question. Why do we need to crash planes into the Towers at all? Since everyone knows terrorists already tried to blow up that building complex from the ground up once, why don't we just blow it up like we plan to anyway, and blame the bombs on the terrorists?

RUMSFELD: Mr. President, you don't understand. It's much better to sneak into the buildings ourselves in the days before the attacks, plant the bombs and then make it look like it was exploding planes that brought the buildings down. That way, we involve more people in the plot, stand a much greater chance of being exposed and needlessly complicate everything!

CHENEY: Of course, just toppling the Twin Towers will never be enough. No one would give us the war mandate we need if we just blow up the Towers. Clearly, we also need to shoot a missile at a small corner of the Pentagon to create a mightily underpublicized additional symbol of international terrorism -- and then, obviously, we need to fake a plane crash in the middle of fucking nowhere in rural Pennsylvania.

RUMSFELD: Yeah, it goes without saying that the level of public outrage will not be sufficient without that crash in the middle of fucking nowhere.

CHENEY: And the Pentagon crash -- we'll have to do it in broad daylight and say it was a plane, even though it'll really be a cruise missile.

BUSH: Wait, why do we have to use a missile?

CHENEY: Because it's much easier to shoot a missile and say it was a plane. It's not easy to steer a real passenger plane into the Pentagon. Planes are hard to come by.

BUSH: But aren't we using two planes for the Twin Towers?

CHENEY: Mr. President, you're missing the point. With the Pentagon, we use a missile, and say it was a plane.

BUSH: Right, but I'm saying, why don't we just use a plane and say it was a plane? We'll be doing that with the Twin Towers, right?

CHENEY: Right, but in this case, we use a missile. (Throws hands up in frustration) Don, can you help me out here?

RUMSFELD: Mr. President, in Washington, we use a missile because it's sneakier that way. Using an actual plane would be too obvious, even though we'll be doing just that in New York.

BUSH: Oh, OK.

RUMSFELD: The other good thing about saying that it was a passenger jet is that that way, we have to invent a few hundred fictional victims and account for a nonexistent missing crew and plane. It's always better when you leave more cover story to invent, more legwork to do and more possible holes to investigate. Doubt, legwork and possible exposure -- you can't pull off any good conspiracy without them.

BUSH: You guys are brilliant! Because if there's one thing about Americans -- they won't let a president go to war without a damn good reason. How could we ever get the media, the corporate world and our military to endorse an invasion of a secular Iraqi state unless we faked an attack against New York at the hands of a bunch of Saudi religious radicals? Why, they'd never buy it. Look at how hard it was to get us into Vietnam, Iraq the last time, Kosovo?

CHENEY: Like pulling teeth!

RUMSFELD: Well, I'm sold on the idea. Let's call the Joint Chiefs, the FAA, the New York and Washington, D.C., fire departments, Rudy Giuliani, all three networks, the families of a thousand fictional airline victims, MI5, the FBI, FEMA, the NYPD, Larry Eagleburger, Osama bin Laden, Noam Chomsky and the fifty thousand other people we'll need to pull this off. There isn't a moment to lose!

BUSH: Don't forget to call all of those Wall Street hotshots who donated $100 million to our last campaign. They'll be thrilled to know that we'll be targeting them for execution as part of our thousand-tentacled modern-day bonehead Reichstag scheme! After all, if we're going to make martyrs -- why not make them out of our campaign paymasters? Shit, didn't the Merrill Lynch guys say they needed a refurbishing in their New York offices?

RUMSFELD: Oh, they'll get a refurbishing, all right. Just in time for the "Big Wedding"!

ALL THREE: (cackling) Mwah-hah-hah!

source: Rolling Stone

Obvious rationalization of the official story is obvious.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

Obvious rationalization of the official story is obvious.

Never mind that shit.  Did you check out the golden bozos on that Muslim chick?

Why not?  Dude, are you gay?  Because you failed the gay test.

Asking for the agency I work for.  Youre on two extermination lists now buddie.  Better keep your nose clean.

[Dr. MD MD]

Never mind that shit.  Did you check out the golden bozos on that Muslim chick?

Why not?  Dude, are you gay?  Because you failed the gay test.

Asking for the agency I work for.  Youre on two extermination lists now buddie.  Better keep your nose clean.

I’m shaking. <yawn> :

[Gd5150]

Never mind that shit.  Did you check out the golden bozos on that Muslim chick?

Why not?  Dude, are you gay?  Because you failed the gay test.

Asking for the agency I work for.  Youre on two extermination lists now buddie.  Better keep your nose clean.

Hot! Bet that towel is no where to be found when she hits “the clubs”.

[AZZERAE]

Did you check out the golden bozos on that Muslim chick?

INFIDEL!!! I declare a fatwa on the head of Digital Haraam Snuggler, for glancing at one of my wive's ankles!!!

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

I’m shaking. <yawn> :

You should be.  Allow me to explain why.

Nobody gives two fucks about the theory that the towers and B7 were deliberately taken down.  In the public mind, it has been debunked and discredited.  It is marginalized to the realm of conspiracy retards.

All of this, of course, plays right into the hands of the conspirators.  Rubbing their hands with glee, their plan is almost complete.  Except...

Well, except for those conspiracy retards, like you.  The flame is down to a flicker, but it's you retards who keep it lit.  Perhaps someday you will find traction with someone of knowledge and stature who can blow the lid on this whole thing.  You are a loose end, and you represent a risk.  Thousands of co-conspirators keeping quiet, not one of them breaking their silence.  But not you nuts.  You shout it from the rooftops, and by that I mean repost warmed-over conspiracy theories, never getting anywhere but never tiring of it, either.  So as long as you all are alive, the risk is there. 

Or is it?

Why would an entity that is so powerful that it could slaughter hundreds of people, start wars slaughtering thousands more, spending billions, not take you out?  They could squash you like a roach, erase you like a misspelled word in iOS.  It would be nothing to them. 

And yet, they do not.  And there are only two logical reasons why they do not.  The first is that they do not exist in the first place, and thus everything you are doing is for naught and a waste of your life (unless you are getting some hot conspiracy pussy at the after-convention keggers).  The second is that they do exist, but what you offer is wrong, or you otherwise represent no threat at all.  In which case, everything you are doing etc hot pussy etc etc).

Did you see the hogans on that Muslim chick?  Phaggot.  Go back to blasting rope to a Loose Change video.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

INFIDEL!!! I declare a fatwa on the head of Digital Haraam Snuggler, for glancing at one of my wive's ankles!!!

I purposely chose the picture that crops out her ankles, and still you lash out at me.  Nothing makes you happy.

Now excuse me while I go declare my fatwan between that chicks legs and make her see God.

[AZZERAE]

I purposely chose the picture that crops out her ankles, and still you lash out at me.  Nothing makes you happy.

Now excuse me while I go lay a fatwan between that chicks legs and make her see God.

Only if I can join in. Don’t tell my other wife.

[Dr. MD MD]

You should be.  Allow me to explain why.

Nobody gives two fucks about the theory that the towers and B7 were deliberately taken down.  In the public mind, it has been debunked and discredited.  It is marginalized to the realm of conspiracy retards.

All of this, of course, plays right into the hands of the conspirators.  Rubbing their hands with glee, their plan is almost complete.  Except...

Well, except for those conspiracy retards, like you.  The flame is down to a flicker, but it's you retards who keep it lit.  Perhaps someday you will find traction with someone of knowledge and stature who can blow the lid on this whole thing.  You are a loose end, and you represent a risk.  Thousands of co-conspirators keeping quiet, not one of them breaking their silence.  But not you nuts.  You shout it from the rooftops, and by that I mean repost warmed-over conspiracy theories, never getting anywhere but never tiring of it, either.  So as long as you all are alive, the risk is there. 

Or is it?

Why would an entity that is so powerful that it could slaughter hundreds of people, start wars slaughtering thousands more, spending billions, not take you out?  They could squash you like a roach, erase you like a misspelled word in iOS.  It would be nothing to them. 

And yet, they do not.  And there are only two logical reasons why they do not.  The first is that they do not exist in the first place, and thus everything you are doing is for naught and a waste of your life (unless you are getting some hot conspiracy pussy at the after-convention keggers).  The second is that they do exist, but what you offer is wrong, or you otherwise represent no threat at all.  In which case, everything you are doing etc hot pussy etc etc).

Did you see the hogans on that Muslim chick?  Phaggot.  Go back to blasting rope to a Loose Change video.

So because no one’s come to kill me yet therefore the official story?!

You’re a brilliant logician, sir (don’t give up your day job  ).

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

So because no one’s come to kill me yet therefore the official story?!

You’re a brilliant logician, sir (don’t give up your day job  ).

Seventeen years.  Absolutely no progress of any kind, except in being marginalized.  Nobody other than some nutballs gives a shit anymore.

Please select one of these two responses to the above:

a) proud to be a part of the movement

b) concerned that something seems to be wrong

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

Only if I can join in. Don’t tell my other wife.

[Dr. MD MD]

Seventeen years.  Absolutely no progress of any kind, except in being marginalized.  Nobody other than some nutballs gives a shit anymore.

Please select one of these two responses to the above:

a) proud to be a part of the movement

b) concerned that something seems to be wrong

Afraid not. The great majority of people know it’s bullshit, just like the JFK official story. What’s it like to be a shill without a moral compass? Does it pay well?

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

Afraid not. The great majority of people know it’s bullshit, just like the JFK official story. What’s it like to be a shill without a moral compass? Does it pay well?

"The Silent Majority" canard, eh?  BRING BACK DICK

[Dr. MD MD]

"The Silent Majority" canard, eh?  BRING BACK DICK

That’s probably the only sensible thing you’ve ever said...and your trying to be ironic.

[Jackstar]

Seventeen years.  Absolutely no progress of any kind,

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=HILLARY+COLLAPSE+HD

The titles of the videos alone are hilarious. If you can't see what is clearly happening at this event... if you don't think this criminal getting thrown into a van like a sack of potatoes is an example of progress of a certain kind, there's really nothing that will get your attention.

Obvious head in the sand is obvious.

Nobody other than some nutballs gives a shit anymore.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.  This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger'  ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs',  'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics',  'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others  shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.


It's hard to imagine what's more laughable--the idea that it doesn't matter, or the idea that people don't care. In either case, your opinion is invalid. You've been shitting on the topic for years--can't you afford a new playbook yet?

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=HILLARY+COLLAPSE+HD

The titles of the videos alone are hilarious. If you can't see what is clearly happening at this event... if you don't think this criminal getting thrown into a van like a sack of potatoes is an example of progress of a certain kind, there's really nothing that will get your attention.

Obvious head in the sand is obvious.

I don't have the slightest fucking idea about what you are talking about.  Hillary, the fainting episode, a van, 9/11 memorial.  So what?  The Entity shot her with a poison dart?  WTF are you on about now?

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.  This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger'  ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs',  'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics',  'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others  shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.


It's hard to imagine what's more laughable--the idea that it doesn't matter, or the idea that people don't care. In either case, your opinion is invalid. You've been shitting on the topic for years--can't you afford a new playbook yet?

What if those words are really an accurate description, though?

It's hilarious how you nuts think everyone but you is some kind of simpering coward.

Nobody cares, Jack.  It's no longer something in the mainstream discourse.  There will always be chatter about it amongst a minority of people who have various mental diminuations or personality disorders.  But as a matter of public interest, it's off the radar screen.  To pretend otherwise is self-delusion.

People nowadays go bugshit because someone said the word "nigger" in an academic context or says something demeaning about women or some other infraction.  It's in the news for weeks, for some things.  it goes viral on the internet.  The offenders lose their jobs, their careers, become social pariahs.

You're talking about the greatest crime in the history of the USA.  You nuts say you have proof positive about it.  You make all kinds of claims, including that people care about it.  But it's just not a matter of public discourse in any meaningful way, shape, or form.  You nuts can't even get a Select Committee like they did in 1978.  Because nobody believes it and nobody cares.

Rant and rave about me all you want, but what I'm saying is true, and somewhere buried deep down in your cortex you know that, which is why your penis shrivels up like a raisin every time I start talking about the subject.

[Jackstar]

I don't have the slightest fucking idea about what you are talking about.

Okay, start here. Let the rest of the class know when you've caught up.

Pack a lunch. You are pretty far behind.

[Jackstar]

Nobody cares, [...] It's no longer something in the mainstream discourse. [...] as a matter of public interest, it's off the radar screen. [...] it's just not a matter of public discourse in any meaningful way, shape, or form. [...] Because nobody believes it and nobody cares.

Just how actually stupid are you, by the way? Asking for a friend.

but what I'm saying is true

Nope. It's the other one.

why your penis shrivels up like a raisin every time I start talking about the subject.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.  This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger'  ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs',  'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics',  'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others  shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

Still no new playbook, huh? That's too bad.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

Nope. It's the other one.


Still no new playbook, huh? That's too bad.

Nobody that matters cares.  Happy now? 

If I were you, I would do the same thing.  The 911 conspiracy horseshit is a dead end.  It's never going anywhere.  Fifty years from now it will be like the Kennedy assassination.  Most of the principals will be dead; the conspiracy theories will be a tiny minority of paranoid whackos and ignorant uneducated slobs; and the history books will write what you call "the official line."

So if I were you, I would make lemonade out of lemons just like you are.  I would present an air of starchy superiority, and I would fuck every stupid chick who is enchanted enough to wander into my orbit.  I would thrill them with my conspiracy stories until their panties are wetter than DrMDMD's lower lip.  I'd bang those dumb twats like a screen door, two and three at a clip.  I'd get more pussy than Frank Sinatra.  Why, I'd even have some twinks skulking around, just for the dry times.

Yes, that sounds like a future worth living for.  And compared to the alternative -- when you take stock of your life and see how much of it is wasted and how the chicks flee from a loser with no money and no job and no mojo...even the twinks would evaporate on you.  I'm shuddering here.

Yah man just stick with the 911 conspiracy stuff and whatever else you can use to prime the pump.  We'll just leave this conversation between the two of us.  I would not be a bro if I got between you and your pussy.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

Okay, start here. Let the rest of the class know when you've caught up.

Pack a lunch. You are pretty far behind.

We've been over this before.  This shit you are posting about isn't something that requires twenty years of study before you can grasp it.  It's not something that only you, the fucking Daili Lama, and that guy the Beatles hung out with in 1968 can understand.  It's something that can be summarized in a sentence, maybe a short paragraph.

You never do that, though, because IF YOU DO you are going to have your ass handed to you and you goddamn well know it.  Instead, you just huff that it's MY failure because I won't watch five hours of video without having the slightest goddamn idea why I'm watching them.

Wanna summarize what the Hillary stuff is about?  Then FUCKIN DO IT.  Be a man, you goddamn limp-wristed twinkletoed Poindexter. 

[Metron2267]

Wanna summarize what the Hillary stuff is about?  Then FUCKIN DO IT.  Be a man, you goddamn limp-wristed twinkletoed Poindexter.

One word - Satan.

Brief enough for ya?

Now FUCK THE HELL OFF, traitor.

[DigitalPigSnuggler]

One word - Satan.

Brief enough for ya?

Now FUCK THE HELL OFF, traitor.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[deep breath]

AHHHHHHHH-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So, you've switched topics?  We were talking about 911 and now its something about Hillary being Satan or something.  And I'm a traitor because I keep asking you what you're talking about.   You can't see the Goatse-sized hole in your logic, if not your presentation skills?  Any one of you human retreads is free to answer that question.

Oh, this is rich.  This is the ACME.  Pardon me while I wet my pants with laughter.  I wish that I could make a personal lubricant out of that post.

I thought I had seen it all, but I had seen nothing.  You guys got off lucky at "conspiracy retards."  The lot of you here on Bellgab, you're like a wrinkled old testicle slapping against the ass of rationality.  You're a clutch of toothless yokels, jacking into your Gadsden Flag spankerchiefs the minute someone gives you a minute to talk about Jesus 911 Christ.  You make Alex Jones look like Sam Donaldson. 

What must your life be like, meeting total strangers who wish you a cheery good morning, not knowing the tsunami of paranoid conspiracy masturbation they are going to be forced to endure: "What's good about it?  Hillary?  Satan!  SATAN!!!"  I imagine it must be similar to what a doctor feels like as he’s about to tell a family member that their loved one is braindead on life support, staring at a hopeful and friendly face, knowing that what is about to come out of your mouth will smash that smile and cripple any positive emotion they may be capable of emitting towards you.

I never learn.  Well, that's my "try" for the next five years.  Oh, happy day.

[Metron2267]

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[deep breath]

AHHHHHHHH-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Multiple line spacing violations noted and:

It's something that can be summarized in a sentence, maybe a short paragraph.

...failure to tribute me for doing what Jacky was unwilling to.

So, you've switched topics?  We were talking about 911 and now its something about Hillary being Satan or something.

Big picture fail.

And I'm a traitor because I keep asking you what you're talking about.   You can't see the Goatse-sized hole in your logic, if not your presentation skills?  Any one of you human retreads is free to answer that question.

Oh, this is rich.  This is the ACME.  Pardon me while I wet my pants with laughter.  I wish that I could make a personal lubricant out of that post.

I thought I had seen it all, but I had seen nothing.  You guys got off lucky at "conspiracy retards."  The lot of you here on Bellgab, you're like a wrinkled old testicle slapping against the ass of rationality.  You're a clutch of toothless yokels, jacking into your Gadsden Flag spankerchiefs the minute someone gives you a minute to talk about Jesus 911 Christ.  You make Alex Jones look like Sam Donaldson.

No greater compliment could be garnered, TY!

Oh and...Bill Cooper!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFQo9THUT4U&feature=youtu.be

What must your life be like, meeting total strangers who wish you a cheery good morning, not knowing the tsunami of paranoid conspiracy masturbation they are going to be forced to endure: "What's good about it?  Hillary?  Satan!  SATAN!!!"  I imagine it must be similar to what a doctor feels like as he’s about to tell a family member that their loved one is braindead on life support, staring at a hopeful and friendly face, knowing that what is about to come out of your mouth will smash that smile and cripple any positive emotion they may be capable of emitting towards you.

I never learn.  Well, that's my "try" for the next five years.  Oh, happy day.

Buh bye -  traitor!

[Jackstar]

summarize what the Hillary stuff is about?  Then FUCKIN DO IT.

[attachment=1]

Wanna

It is quite clear that you misunderstand my purpose here.