Quote from: VtaGeezer on November 27, 2015, 11:53:15 AMI felt that way until I put these together:Maybe you could fill us in on what's usual from the public info desk of police. What effort has been made to get a statement from them?
No official statement by the Sheriff's Dept.
No witnesses' public statements?
QuoteNo news coverage of an intrusion of a celebrity's home? Not a peep comes up about any of this stuff.That silence may or may not be significant. On one hand, fact checking by news pros is often so pitiful that you'd expect something like this to turn up in the news regardless of how shaky it is. OTOH, being fact checking is so weak, how much significance can be laid to either the presence or absence of stories?
QuoteAnd the big one...an armed stalker lurking about the open Bell compound yet he keeps his wife and little daughter there?Sure, where he can watch them. If the stalker is after his family, what good would it do them to separate? What should he do, hire imposters to get shot in place of them while the real ones sneak out via the tunnel?
I tend to suspect publicity stunts by media people. For a long time I thought Rush Limbaugh's supposed narcotics addiction was a publicity stunt. As long as there was no official action (and you never know who's a target of indictment), it was just some statements by a cleaning lady and Limbaugh. This is more than that, and while it's conceivable that it could all have been set up, and Mr. Bell is after all a showman, I don't think it's fake.