• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Roger

#91
Radio and Podcasts / Re: The stars have gone out
May 15, 2011, 04:02:03 AM
Actually, Orange, I'm finding myself moving towards your more balanced
measurement of 'reality'.

I'm finding measurement and judgement things not a little bit beyond
even articulate reaction.
#92
'Investigative reporter' is a misnomer when anyone can anticipate what such
'reporter' is going to conclude ere she says a single word.

'Radio in the night' reduced to 'dogma': not that good a sell.

I don't know about anyone else, but I like to drink in the state of
of CURIOSITY.

When curiosity is short-changed into some forgone conclusion (always,
seemingly, reduced to 'advanced aliens' whom we MUST recognize to be
REALISTIC): curiosity, interest, intrique . . . NOT!

The apparent IRRESISTABLE urge is to come to a CONCLUSION.

Maybe typical. The primary complaint: We just got started! And yer done?


#93
OH! And furthermore: if you or anyone you know DID have some creative
idea or some line of thinking and urge to experiment so as to find out
for themselves; and yet were susceptible to propoganda that some 'alien'
had already solved the 'problem' . . . well, maybe they'd be disheartened
and not follow through with their own native curiosity or investigation.

Maybe you thought you invented the best can-opener ever.  Then you opened
the paper and read an advertizement saying: best can opener ever here!
Only 25 cents! (Plus shipping and handling!)  May you saw a picture and
it looked like your idea.  What does a regular person do in the face of
such competition?

Okay, maybe someone had the same idea, same pattern of thought. Maybe even
some 'licence' to produce such.

Everyone has ideas.  Who holds the 'patent' of the concept of 'knife'?

Who makes the best knife?  Who makes the best 'bread-board'?

Millions of people can take a little steel or pieces of wood to make
either in varient fashions.

A fundemental concept of controlled 'explosions' wielded the internal
combustion engine.

Whence comes today the 'car', even though a steam-driven car preceded
the so-called 'gasoline engine' car. The steam-car is returning.

Least force, greatest milage: practical.

Somebody is going to derive motive force from the most universal force:
cosmic rays, neutrinos: some way to funnel this energy unidirectionally.

Seems highly difficult to most of us, but some budding experimentor, some
acnied teenager today or his or her child or grandchild will get it.

And when they do, their heirs will wonder: how did those 'geniuses' ere
then not see that?
#94
the hardest thing for any expert to say or espouse is the first princple of
learning: i don't know.

'I don't know' is stimulus of investigation. Curiosity. Current model
of thought, based on so-called 'science by elimination of fallow
models' is meaningless.  Or what? We have exhausted all possible models?

Model today is based on the very limited fact that funding is limited.
Publishing is limited to what funding limited.

So any ordinary 'joe' or 'jane' might find something out on a weekly
and humble wage, but who dig according to their own interest and being
intrigued by something nature not yet fully looked at.

r.
#95
There have been several people in even the early 20th century or even
late 19th century who contemplated that gravity was a kind of Bernouli
effect writ large.

The same principles that allow a plane to fly or a leaf to float to the
ground might be extended in some practical way to move a body without
wind . . . . unless it was some other form of 'air' or 'fluid' that
might be moved by some means, and that movement differentiated with
regard to a body.

It is, perhaps, a problem for social-managers, when some 'nobody' might
find a means to move about or move things without resorting to typical
brute-force.

The so-called 'subtle' energies inherent in nature, when reduced to
an easily understood principle, like the first-principle tools concept of
'fulcrum' or amplified power through pullies and such, if this should
reduce a commercial concept. . . . that would have been . . . or will be
. . . or was . . . an issue of contention and objection to so-called
holders of 'power'.

The 'model' or 'mathematical orientation' as to what is going on, might be
90 degrees or some other tangent out of sync with reality.

When someone utilizes a different orientation of thought or a different way
of using this most common and thus disregarded power in a device: good luck
getting even a 'maverick' professor of physics to experiment with
such 'varient'.

Just read the old natural philosphers.  Then look at the so-called 'new-age'
physicists.  They all fall upon that 'glory'-ful statement: "It stands
on theoretical grounds alone".

Theory or model most preferred confers upon the experimentor a limted
scope of experiment.  They'll look at what some 'important' person deems
worthy of effort.

Leaves lots of room for basement or garage experimentors to leans lots
even though they know nothing espoused by such 'experts'.

Lot

#96
One day, all of you 'Anti-Noorites' will realize that TERMERICK is the new
LDS!

Tomathy Leary used LDS so that he was able to drop out, tune in, and turn
on! He clicked his amgydalin (B18) forward!

Whay caint you dumb peaples ree-lize, that we DONT need these things!

Merely chant 'GEORGE'.  Joorge jorrge georje.

This is the wya to to inlitnment!

Harry Geerge, harry geerge, geerge gerrge harry harry!

See ya at the airport!
#97
Radio and Podcasts / Re: George Knapp
May 09, 2011, 02:34:55 AM
Well, speaking of something said above about 'abiotic oil' and whatever
deviousness involved in oil and gas prices notwithstanding: while talking
to my brother-in-law about how to fix a lawn-mower, we got to talking about
oil (which every grease-monkey is practically anointed with by virtue of
the shit they do every-day).

And my BIL (brother-in- . . . wait, he's my nieces' significant other, so
he'd be my 'nephew-in-law'! As shit, I should re-write this post . . . ah
fuck it):

He asked me: do you think oil prices are going to go down?

Trying to seem 'smart' I tried to hold my breath for a momement, and then
come up with something that sounded 'intelligent'.

'Yeah! Sure! Of course!'

Like most of these conversations between two ignoramuses, every attempt will
be made to try to justify any opinion.

After an uncomfortable pause, he brought up from the fount of his (he's not
a dummy) discretion or figuring about things, that there is something strange
about 'tar oil'.

I rejoined: well, there's 'shale-oil'.

One thing led to another, and we were both dredging up things we'd read
or heard or saw on some tv show.

He said some things way over my head, but then I recalled a show hosted
by Alan Alda in which he was interviewing Robert Ballard.

Ballard said all of the ocean's water moves into the depths of the earth
and comes out again so many years (millions? don't recall the time cycle).

Imagine all the bio-mass suspended in ocean water.

Phytoplankton, krill, dead-sea-weed, tons of dead fish, whales, 'giant
squids'. . . every living thing dying in the oceans will to some degree
go along with the ocean water and subducted into the 'bowels of the earth'.

Yet it comes out again, according to Ballard to Alda.

So: not all 'dinosaurs' or surface plant life making these pools called
'ol'.

We don't know how this globe works, exactly. Some alternatives to thinking
have as of yet never been open to discussion on C2C. Seems like every
extremity, usually devolving on some critique of a political thesis
becomes the bottom line.

Thus far, something that could be interesting, developable so far as
thinking and reflection and exploration is concerned: not.

C2C is mono-polar.  For my money, that is worse than bi-polar or even
schizophrenic talk.  The ravings of mad-men and women at least can be
instructive or probatively (in a reverse kind of way) cautionary. Maybe
intertaining . . . but only a sick kind of way probably.

Otherwise 'monopolar' talk is hypnotically BOOOORRRRING. Shutting down
interest in anything remotely related that might actually be SANE.

Truly probative. Truly of intense interest to regular folk.

GAWD! Do we need a Reichian, Jungian or even (God forbid) Freudian
to explain why this venue is, in and of itself crazy?

Last night N was talking with a coulple of guys about 'Roswell'.

I listened only to the last few moments of the show.

Somehow one of the guests got a query from GN so that he replied with
a story about an experience with two guys who wandered into a museum
about Aliens and UFOs.  The guest described these fellows as very odd,
apparently 'silently communicating'.  The guest described one as being
near 7 foot tall and 'eyes on the SIDES of his head'.

What did GN retort to this?: 'They are everywhere!'

And that was the end of it.  I didn't regret missing the entire 'show'.

I did regret hearing what I heard. A potentially foul end of an otherwise
pretty good weeks-ending's beginning, late as it was. Thankfully fixed by
interaction with real life with real people and a few more beers.

The resultant hangover was better than that last from C2C.

I regret that last, not the former, nor the latter ere the former former.

(wait, what's the math here? passive voice, yeah, but who am I saying
who or what I regret? . . . ah fuck it. I know what I liked, and what
I hated, don't I????? C2C: that's what!)








#98
Oh! And Art's worst interview(s)? Talking to anyone about hand-washing,
vampires, Ed Dames, Whitley Strieber. Economics.
Really just 'phoning it in'.
#99
That is interesting.

I'd like to see the entire body 'lighting up' at once with any stimuli.

Cross-indexing, alone, provides most complete information.

I worry about 'atomizing' of attention to selected segments and attempting
to derive some general information thereby.

One thing I've thought about is: the 'ghost limb' effect.

Suppose an acupuncturist did work with an amputee. Not on his body, but
on his or her 'ghost-limb'?  Could be a test of the 'aura-body' theory.

What happens when a stimuli is applied to the area where the limb, now
'absent', would be: according to functional MRI?

I maintain that just looking at reactions in the matter in the skull is
not a truly complete 'brain-scan', since there is 'brain' in the entire
spinal cord as well.

#100
Yeah, it was unjustifiably vague: conversation of a madman with obsessive
thoughts.

I recall I was thinking about Ronald Reagan, and the 'hawk' mentality
of so-called 'conservatives'.

Their justification of bombings of non-combatants. Thoughts going back
to 'Sherman's march', Dresden, all the acts of war.

Then reflecting on the quoters of ancient texts, and how, like Franklin
said (more or less): any fool can find some quote in sacred writings some
justification for their folly.

Who knows?

As to 'no god does good'.

Depends on what we designate as 'god'.

For some: outer power, for others: conscience.

In the former: much or most of the world problems. In the latter: the
actual typical daily way of life of most.

Most don't want to get involved with people with love of power.

Is this a defect of the life of conscience? Lambs, doves and loving-ones
with no defences against such? What's the defence without becoming like
one hates?


#101
Okay, I did have to cut and paste to reply to two excellent remarks: first
one by Aldousburbank somewhere else:

""We need to get to the root cause of what is causing this and combat it
and fight it whatever way we can."


"This would have been something I could have wholeheartedly agreed with
George about, had he been talking about his sucky little radio show.
Otherwise, notice that even when placed in context, Noory's statement
signifies nothing but horseshit.  Same as it ever was.  This guy sucks so bad that it sometimes makes me
exceedingly happy to say that he does.  It's a beautiful thing."

That summarizes the joy of this-here web-'sites' or pages.

Then something EVB said:

"Any segment, indeed any INDIVIDUAL in a customer base (in this case listeners) should have some influence.  these numbers may have changed, but last time i
took a marketing class the conventional wisdom was to assume that for every ONE letter of complaint received ONE HUNDRED people felt the same but did not
bother to write."

I doubt the ratio given by EVB's source.  I think the unpublished and
popular like-sentiments of any 'voicer/writer/caller' to any public venue
is much greater.

The internet and web-loguing or 'blogging' is the answer to the editing
that was intransigent heretofore in print-media . . . often biased to
letters agreeing with the editorial perviewer, stated policy or political
leaning, or publishing the varients or 'off-the-wall' few as if justifying
the restriction of voice by public-readership.

It would be interesting to see a collection of 'rejected' letters-to-the-editor
of any major paper in the past (that might have been preserved) and see
what articulate, cogent, and pointed critiques got into the 'circular'
file-cabinet.

Persistance pays off.

I saw Ana's posting about the new-thread, and am anxious to go there and
read what others might have noticed about that.  I didn't listen but to
the last few minutes. Wondered if I'd missed anything deep.  Then, hearing
a remark by George, I gagged.

should be funny.





#102
No! Yer king!

I does some-a-times use text-editor, then cut and paste. Not in the ones
posted here though.

I wrote in the little 'quick reply' window.

Verbose, no doubt about that.

A silly, 'flow of consciousness after having drunk too much' type of
posting.

Hitting the 'quote' button with me: maybe not a good idea. Then's a good
time to cut and paste! ferget the quote-button. ha ha

More beer, less typing: maybe then my writing will improve!



#103
Quote from: Evil Twin Of Zen on May 07, 2011, 02:49:30 AM

oh i'm purdy sure we know what's going on and pissed cuz yer not sharing any.  8)

I'm sorry to have to use the 'quote' button. It isn't that
this child wants to see his own words propagated. I jist
didn't want to adumbrate your words. That little bit after
my verbosity, where you said something me-wards, cut me to
the quick.

I'll share some. Tit for tat. Just happen to think 'writing'
is no person. No person very important. Writing is the
thing.

I wez just trying to be funny. After I writ what I wrote,
almost got a stomache laughing.

That warn't me: that was comedy writing!

Is 'comedy' a person?

Who gives a flying f*** by whom it comes? Any writer might
be an actual idiot!

I thought the internet was great for the sake of writing
in and of itself.

Trust me: I'm a nobody. Not famous, don't live in LA,
never wrote a screen-play, never wrote a book, never
did anything important or associated in any recent way
with the 'rich and famous'.

My dad WAS friends with Erle Stanley Gardner, my Mom did
write for Love Pulp mags in the 30s and 40s, but me?

I haven't done shit but inherit a love of words from my
more worthy parents.

They did things. Beside writing anonymously on the internet,
trying to be funny, I mow my lawn as art.

I'm a joker. Like a 'Loki'. I mock, I taunt, measure
according to my own puny lights. Nothing final, certainly
not. I'm a fool.  Just don't like other fools pretending
they aren't, like me, also fools.

I'm not proud. I'll pick up that penny you dropped for me.

Thanks for the rebuke. I happen to believe we live by
rebukes better than compliments.



#104
Uhm, my son, 'Roger' is now, and henceforth, not allowed to use his father's
computer! He has obsessive-complusive disorder, attention-deficit-hyper-
activity disorder and our doctor says he has a 'messiah complex' and he is
not using his lithium right now. We're hoping the electro-shock treatments
will help.

Sorry for whatever he might have said heretofore.

We are a good family, and we are not responsible, so our lawyer says we
should say, for whatever he wrote in one of his manic . . . oh yes, he
is manic-depressive or 'bi-polar' . . . .states.

We don't know how he found the key to our liqour cabinet.  We are good parents.

We've taken away all sharp objects with which he might try to write.

Roger's Mom

#105
Crap! My Mom happened to read my postings, somehow, to this odd site.

Back to mowing lawns in lala land.  Hope that show does well without my
contributions! Good luck Harmon! F****rs! Just like when I got fired
from SG-1!  See what that got ya!?  Thank GAWD I still have a job on
FRINGE! . . . .huh? What~? FirED? I was just starting on the next
season!????~!!!!

O well, back to work on the Mayan calender. Let's see, I left off at
2012. Now! 2013 through 3012. 1 cent per day. Pretty good pay!
#106
Breached, broached, broken, whatever.

Stakes, high as some put them, some deep trend goes merrily along
and bad bets are bound to get little or no returns.

I think things are going pretty well. Glad I have nothing to do with it,
and glad it will get better no matter what I say or write.

Or do we?

Our words but fringes to what's going on.
#107
Well, wait: first of all, how will writing a MST3k make us more attractive
to anagrammy? Secondly, as a defunct venue: how do we make money doing that?

I'm thinking this is a waste(sp?) of (is it waist?) time.

Now if Barbara Hale said: DO IT! I'd do it.

If anagrammy said 'Do it!', I'd try it.

Like I've said before: why can't we idiots make our own radio show?

What's stopping us?  It would all have to do with a genuine secured
fund of monies contributed by a cooperative numbers to a defined purpose
that could legally allow that all contributors would get their money
back unless the agreed-upon aim was not realized.

The AIR-WAVES are free to develop.  Much better that than prescious earth.

Who says a 'year' is 365 days?  Imagine the interest and intrique possible
with a bunch of commedians/commediennes as we all are doing radio!

Could be deep, shallow, funny, serious, religious, agnostic, atheistic:
hosts take the chance and be subject to all rebukes!

Could be a merry troop! Or complete flop.

Otherwise: just us griping about our so-called daily fare. Like it was
compulsive.

Otherwise: turn it off. Gather around the fire-place instead of a tv or
computer screen. Tell tall tales or recall actual stories remembered from
forebears.

We can be insular, disregard what is being lost, or we can gently and
insistently preserve what we have found beautiful, lovely, funny even,
and things fitting no thing or category with which we are familiar.

A single principle abides: cooperation to mutual good is better than
insulation, fighting and killing out of fears. This, most of all, is
what I find most objectionable in the fear-mongering crap coming out
of c2c nowadays.

I believe in the age-old and well tested principles of diplomacy, which
have been neglected or broached by men and women of recent history.

When something different faces: talk. When talk doesn't work, bribe.
When bribe doesn't work: boycott or embargo.  When none of these work:
threat war or fighting.  When even that fails: then true war is reasonable.

Who doesn't know that the very first facet of diplomacy has never had
any serious or sincere endeavor?  People hear only what they want to hear
and when they don't hear what they want to hear, they are ready to jump
to fighting.  Yet diplomacy, tried and true, disallows this.  You can
bribe.  This is TRADE.  Money talks. But part and parcel to TRADE is
LOVE-TRADE: marriages, intermingling or allowing ones' kids to have kids
with the so-called ALIENS' kids. Those 'Others'.

This has been a big cause of 'embargo' because of
racial prejudices.

Kids are kids and are all loveable.

Intellectual constructs, belief systems, 'GOD' concepts
apart from simple kindness or GOODNESS that everyone
feel, disallow such innocent mingling.

It is idol wars. Idle doings.

So land is held back, love is held back, war is loved!

Who says 'freedom' is a 'cause'?

Love is the only 'land' there is.  'Land' includes the air-waves.

Today, 'money' has weapons as the modicum of 'exchange'. Takings, killings
but not allowing loves. No minglings.

What are 'air-waves'?  What is 'ether'?

What is moving to and fro?

I see hard-heartedness. Stiff necks. Bitterness.

So yes. About this cheapness, I am bitter.

Don't like it.

Not nice.

Not kind.
#108
I thought you were asking if I had written IN or upon books. I respect
you so much, I felt I was called on the carpet! By the sexy librarian
with the winged horn-rimmed glasses, who reins-in all us rabble-rousers
with a simple 'shhh!'

I do know (vaguely) a stunt-person in Hollywood, though! Does that count?

If I wrote a book, would you date me?

I can write a book! I'm starting tonight! No! I swear to God,
TWO BOOKS! Three!  If I was famus, wud ya luv me?

#109
No, wait. I meant, No, No. I meant, I've written IN books. In the margins!
Which is probably why the library no longer allows me to get into the rare
books room!

#110
No. Yes.
#111
There are almost innumerable mathematical constructs that
have so-called 'predictive' potentialities.

My sparse reading of the history of science seems to suggest
that a ratio between the numbers of mathematical
'writing' or workings to practical applications turns out
to show, in either case, they rarely are simultaneous.

I read again and again that mathematical pattern lovers
are found by experimentalists to be highly utile. Number
and number theory working into emperical stuff.

There are also almost innumberable emperical experiences
or experiments that have not, as of yet, been aligned with
such 'theoretical grounds'.

I don't see any reason to mock any such emprical matters
that haven't, as of yet, been thoroughly checked out,
or aligned with such 'paper work'.

We might be shooting ourselves in the foot in passing off
reports, however 'exotic' as 'baseless' and 'meaningless'.

I don't know much more than passing awareness of this
'Hutchison' or his 'effect'.

The math wizards seem to presage what will come to be
practical by direct experiment. Or is it that we can
'force-fit' such models to experience? What, then, becomes
of the 'error' of such models? Does it affect our appreciation
of direct experiments? Is this 'prejudice'. Does this affect
funding? Finding?

Another thing is also obvious: many basement/garage or
'kitchen' experimentor has developed some very useful
things that haven't as yet been matched up
with current understanding of mathematical theories
past or present.

If you want to mock 'Hutchinson' (sp?) effect,
go ahead. I don't know much
about this. Thanks for pointing it out though.

I only know that so far as the Lazar story goes,
I'm still waiting to understand how he comes up with a
theory of gravity as 'waves' by being
a short-term employee at a secret installation.

This 'wave theory' of gravity was extant long ere
Lazar started touting it.

Maybe that was his prejudice. A fantastic story to
'substantiate' it: not thinking it actually helps that
theory.

I respect mockery of fraud. When someone mocks someone or
something and doesn't even know the name of what they mock:
makes me want to look at that topic and find out for myself.

I seriously doubt that was your intent.

I cannot know that for sure by reading what you write.

If your intent was to spur such research: well done.

Your psychology seems to work! Insincere, devious. It would
make me also think: maybe such would be our destruction if
such a devious method promoted it!

I know next to nothing about this, but here are some
links about this 'Hutchison effect' you find so meaningless
(or maybe you want us to destroy ourselves by it!
MWAH ha ha ha!) Right?

Er, wait! Yer not Bob Lazar, are you?

The Hutchison Effect-John Hutchison
hutchison effect
http://www.thehutchisoneffect.com/
http://wn.com/Bill_Beaty
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg02594.html

And, apparently countless others on this so-called 'effect'.

We'll see.

#112
Radio and Podcasts / Re: The stars have gone out
May 06, 2011, 11:26:53 PM
George may be STONED! Schrapnel, frags, no matter what: he keeps talkin'.
I'm thinkin' he's thinkin': GAWD! Hope I wake up tomorrow at least, in time
for mess! After that! Sleepin' and dreamin' and gettin' a check! Bodies
falling left and right (neglected interesting subjects) notwithstanding:
gonna get a check!

Oops! Gotta catch a plane back to LALA land! Have an interview lined up
with the yet-living people involved with MAUDE. Or is it 'MoD'? I'll ask
Lissa (or is it Leesa?). Jon La Da Sir will know?  Yeah, yeah, that's what
I'll do. I'll call John, and ask him what I'm doing! Now, what's his number?

Wait! What's my number? What am I talking about? Why am I here? uh. . . .
OH YEAH! My Check! Gotta call Lisel! Why isn't my check here!?????!!!

What about my CONTRACT!?

Doesn't contract mean shrink?

AHA! i REMEMBER NOW: GOTTA GO SEE MY SHRINK WHEN i GET BACK TO LA!
#113
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Art Bell Quits Coast
May 06, 2011, 10:58:48 PM
"Listen! I'd like to carry this conversation on further, but we have other
callers and we're coming up on a break. This is Coast to Coast. Back in a
minute."

#114
Radio and Podcasts / Re: The stars have gone out
May 06, 2011, 05:38:08 PM
Yep, coming week looks pretty lame. Tonight has the potential to be somewhat interesting. We'll see, right!? Could be funny for all the usual reasons.

The 'somewhere in time' show on Saturday will be the only other potential highlite ere end of weekend.

Maybe the Wednesday show with Schopick will prove useful.

We'll see.


----quote from c2c web-site---

Friday, May 6, 2011: Joining George Noory, in the first half, author John LeMay and researcher Noe Torres talk about some of the strange incidents and UFO lore associated with Roswell, New Mexico. Followed by Open Lines.
                     
Saturday, May 7, 2011: Stanford University professor, Mark Z. Jacobson joins Ian to discuss how we can power 100% of the planet with renewable sources of energy like wind, water, and sunlight and what this could mean for the global oil industry ( related essay).
                     
6-10pm PT: Art Bell - Somewhere in Time returns to 12/5/01, when Dan Aykroyd and David Sereda discussed a NASA video showing hundreds of UFOs closely resembling the Dropa Stones - ancient discs found in Tibet by a team of archaeologists in 1938.
                     
Sunday, May 8, 2011: Guest host John B. Wells ( email) is joined by geopolitical analyst Craig B. Hulet, who'll discuss the recent developments in the Middle East, the War on Terror, bin Laden's role in 9-11, and what he sees for the future of the United States.
                     
Monday, May 9, 2011: Author Jim Marrs will discuss how events such as the ongoing deadly radiation from the Fukushima reactors and spraying of Corexit in the Gulf continue with little news coverage, as well as how despite the recent victories over terrorists, there's been no talk of doing away with the Patriot Act, the Real ID Act, or any of the other Constitution-shredding legislation. Hosted by George Noory.
                     
Tuesday, May 10, 2011: Author of psycho-political thrillers, Dr. Steve Pieczenik was trained in psychiatry at Harvard University and international relations at M.I.T. He'll discuss how Psy-ops are being used against the American People on several fronts. Hosted by George Noory.
                     
Wednesday, May 11, 2011: Writer and medical advocate, Julia Schopick began studying alternative medical treatment after her husband developed a cancerous brain tumor. She'll discuss the history of how numerous natural, effective and inexpensive treatments for various diseases have been largely ignored by the medical community. Hosted by George Noory.

Thursday, May 12, 2011: Muckraker out to expose the abuses of the New World Order, Mark Dice has made a career out of speaking truth about the powers that be. He'll discuss the various ways that technology is violating not only our privacy but our civil rights - all using our tax dollars. Hosted by George Noory.

---end quote----
#115
kindnest alone abides.

All 'law' is a puny approximation of such internal sentiment.

It can never be enforced, never be reduced to writ rule.

When 'law', by man made, and intent flowing through all living
things, is vaguely approached by any external reasoning, there must
fallow a form of farce.

'What was intended: good or evil?'

Who decides? Who makes themselves almighty?

Chance and change of circumstances, makes such things variable.

Yet what mother could, ever, see in cold-blooded murder of an infant
anything 'good'?

Does yer 'god' permit sich: good?

What reasonable person, other potentialities available, could?

#116
The 'return of the anti-christ'!

This is the kind of crap that makes up radio garbage.

A heron shouts like a third called 'rich'

'Now is the hour of our discontent'!

A hunchback bullshit purveyor in whom, by ends perceivable by even an
idiot, is only mutual destruction and a great mass-destruction.

Friend of a rush limbaugh, a ronald reagan, hawk, war-monger, no lover of
mankind at large.

Preacher of war.  Much talk of some 'other' as 'beast'.

I don't pretend at understanding poetry taken as 'law'.

What some 'interpreter' of verse would like us to take from verse:

calling that bullshit.

Art is art.  While I don't pretend to understand art, I know what I like
of it.

Where some idiot wants to make a religion of what he or she likes:

Not buying it.

Starve me and mine out, maybe. Not popular.  Pogram maybe, nothing to do
with free will, love or anything spontaneous.  Just propoganda.

Where propoganda is least or not at all: that's where i'm goin'.

'Revelation' something not instructed from without.

Huh! Sounds like adoring kids!

Kids adoring elders!

Elders adoring kids!

Mutual love. practical, full of self-cancelling idiocies.

Maybe that would work!

Who knows?!

Otherwise: kill the kids, kill the elderly.

Where-ever wisdom might abide: kill it!

Leave everything to the exuberant and idiotic and powerful stupid!

Ehhhhhh!

Not.
#117
Well, yeeehaaa! An Irishman has an voice!

Is it 'Protestant' evangelism, or 'Catholic' evanglism?

The answer is blowin' in the wind!

Let me, or you, or any of us common, non-book-writin' folk voice an
opinion:
depends if you git in on an 'open lines' or in response to some 'book writin''
fool.

Guess, our 'voice' will boil down to purchase.  Us goin' up to some
'amazon' or some other 'book' resource.

Here's a 'priest': Patrick Heron, yeah! Fer sure!  He knows it all!

Let's all eat 'Host' together!  Representing what Heron deems essence,
most high, god, and all!

Meanwhile, what we do and what we reveal by actions: being lovingkind,
just, fair, whatever we feel to move us to make and do: nothing important
unless we take a heron as our 'sign'.

I'm thinking I'd rather have a 'chia pet'.

#118
Nice. Good visualizations in few words.

A writer's life in L.A.: must be harsh.

A writer's life anywhere: harsher more so.

Good concept, good summary, still: no work, little comfort
having deep thoughts. The non-buyers of good concepts: pricks.

The pricks produce all the crap. Yet somehow, in all this mix
called 'survival of the fittest' in business, some real art does
get through.

'Facts'?  Writing isn't about 'facts'.

Product alone is 'fact'.

Lucky are we all when 'product', good writing, and fact align.

Not neccessarily in that order.

r.

#119
C2C is a strange fish nowadays. Not interesting 'strange', just odd in a
strange kind of way.

Maybe 'open-lines' was the better part after all, but not the way it
was treated.

Should have been the majority, not the minority treatment.

And if someone really intriquing got the 'ear', keep it going for
as long as possible or until things crash.

Once a week: 'special guest', then time for listeners to ruminate
and digest the information.

The format was backwards.

Otherwise, as treated, 'open-lines' became kind of anathema.

Not that ordinary people weren't interesting: just because when they
were VERY interesting, they got cut off due to some urgency to get to the
next caller who might regale us with an over-long preamble about being
a 'first-time caller, long time listener, just love you, how's it going
and oh, by the way, listen every night from xxx city, station, BTW, everyone
here really enjoyed last night's show . . . but the reason I called:
how often should I wash my hands again? Your guest the other night, I missed
that part about frequency of hand-washing . . . blah, blah, blah'.

The next call might have had someone saying merely: 'hi, my dad worked
for (some segment of military, private business, etc.) and he told me
and the interruption will finally come: would like to hear more about
this: email me!

Right.

Onto vampires! Ghosts! Nothing provable, nothing substantive.

The interesting callers'll be contacted!

'Interesting', but nothing follows.

Shot in the foot.

Enough was interesting we continue to hope.

I truly believe in reverse psychology.

Please ART, don't come back!

Don't do it right if you do! Keep doing things the wrong way.
#120
Radio and Podcasts / Re: Art Bell Quits Coast
May 04, 2011, 06:14:47 AM
PS: I don't mean 'quantum' any harmness, though, really (to rip off aldous).

Orange put together a good reality sandwhich: marmalade and
almond-butter.  Could be peanut butter, with the right
attitude.

Self-hypnosis maybe. Or who knows: transmutation of one
nut into another kind of nut. Whatever one's bean prefers.

Oh, sorry: LEGUME.

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod