• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

President Donald J. Trump

Started by The General, February 11, 2011, 01:33:34 AM






WeinerInHand

Quote from: tiny hands Convention on November 17, 2018, 07:55:58 AM
[attachment=1,msg1278560]

^^^ Welp, there you have it folks - tiny hands convention - a "Champion" of the gay rights movement. It doesn't really seem like it, does it? How foolish must the gay community be to place faith in this hipocrite?..





Gd5150

2 years of demokkkrat lemmings screaming Trump Russia collusion. Illegal wire taps. Spying. An unconstitutional investigation. Not a single piece of evidence. Anyone still pushing that is nothing more than a confirmed idiot and liar.

Most of these clips are from 18 months ago. 18 months, and still nothing. Haha!


https://youtu.be/lw2BVI9OhC4

Nucky Nolan

Quote from: ItsOver on November 19, 2018, 09:48:24 AM
The schlub can't help it.  It's cold in canuck land and he can only scratch his crotch and dream of beavers so many times in the morning.



Yeah, I bet that he does "dream of beavers so many times". That's about all a leftist Canadian incel cuck can do.

WOTR

Quote from: Metron2267 on November 19, 2018, 11:15:59 AM

The irony is that proper nationalized healthcare would have sucked less than your Obamacare.  Forcing people to buy insurance from private companies, while guaranteeing those companies massive profits seems to be the worst of both systems...

albrecht

Quote from: WOTR on November 19, 2018, 10:25:15 PM
The irony is that proper nationalized healthcare would have sucked less than your Obamacare.  Forcing people to buy insurance from private companies, while guaranteeing those companies massive profits seems to be the worst of both systems...
Is there no private insurance or doctors/hospitals in The Great White North? I, frankly, do not know how your system works. I have lived and used system in "socialist" European countries (I say in jest because in many ways some of them are MUCH more friendly to businesses than the US tax-wise and the healthcare burden is also taken off shoulders of companies.) In the places I lived there was a sorta mixed system. If you made enough you had to buy but if you made under it was covered. And you had to buy from private insurance companies. But also there was a lot of rationing. Which happens everywhere.

Metron2267

Quote from: WOTR on November 19, 2018, 10:25:15 PM
The irony is that proper nationalized healthcare would have sucked less than your Obamacare.  Forcing people to buy insurance from private companies, while guaranteeing those companies massive profits seems to be the worst of both systems...

If nationalizing heath care works so well why do you have provincial privatization going on now?

https://canadians.org/privatization

Those who promote private health care would have you believe that the only way to improve Canada’s health care system is to open it up to for-profit interests. Private clinics are operating across the country offering health care services for a price, and the federal government is doing nothing to stop it.

British Columbia and Quebec are already hotbeds for these clinics, while other provinces â€" such as Alberta and Nova Scotia â€" allow them to a lesser extent. A report by the Ontario Health Coalition found that there are 130 private clinics open in five Canadian provinces, and provided evidence that 89 of these clinics may be selling services in violation of the Canada Health Act.

https://www.cbc.ca/news2/background/healthcare/public_vs_private.html

Does private health care exist in Canada today?

It's a crucial part of the system.

Canada spent an estimated $142 billion on health care in 2005, or $4,411 per person, according to Health Care in Canada 2006, a report released by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. After taking inflation into account, this amounts to almost three times what was spent in 1975.

Of that, just over $98.8 billion was spent by governments delivering public health care. About $43.2 billion was spent on private health care.


a field medic in every neighborhood... that's the ticket! (quality of care may vary)...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36lSzUMBJnc



WOTR

Quote from: albrecht on November 19, 2018, 10:35:53 PM
Is there no private insurance or doctors/hospitals in The Great White North?
As noted above- there are some.  I cannot book open heart surgery, or chemo through them- but I can get an MRI, physio, and other assorted services.  It is a mix- and I'm not saying that abandoning for profit completely is the right decision.  Only that Obamacare was the worse of two worlds.  Nobody in Canada is forced to buy health insurance (though we sure are forced to pay our taxes...)  And gernally you cannot buy insurance like you have in the US.

At this point, I'm not even saying that you should have socialized anything- or that you should move to a one payer system.  I'm just saying that Obamacare was a really bad mix of government policy (thou shalt purchase insurance) with capitalist ideas (thou shalt insure everybody- and we will guarantee you a profit...)

I will also add that while our system is on the verge of imploding, the socialist governments are wanting to bring in universal drug care (prescriptions free for everybody under 18 and over 65) in addition to universal dental care.  Fix the one system first and then saddle me with 25% higher taxes so I can pay for somebody's crown and fillings...  >:(

"I want great climate. We're gonna have that. And we're gonna have forests that are very safe." -Trump


[attachment=1]


[attachment=2]


Metron2267

Quote from: WOTR on November 21, 2018, 01:03:14 AM
As noted above- there are some.  I cannot book open heart surgery, or chemo through them- but I can get an MRI, physio, and other assorted services.  It is a mix- and I'm not saying that abandoning for profit completely is the right decision.  Only that Obamacare was the worse of two worlds.  Nobody in Canada is forced to buy health insurance (though we sure are forced to pay our taxes...)  And gernally you cannot buy insurance like you have in the US.

At this point, I'm not even saying that you should have socialized anything- or that you should move to a one payer system.  I'm just saying that Obamacare was a really bad mix of government policy (thou shalt purchase insurance) with capitalist ideas (thou shalt insure everybody- and we will guarantee you a profit...)

That's because it was strawman designed to be burnt to the ground and replaced by single payer. Obozo and the Dems lined it all up so the private sector would be the fall guys by rising rates and then in pure Hegelian Dialectic the Feds would swoop in to nationalize and appease the restive peasants.

QuoteI will also add that while our system is on the verge of imploding, the socialist governments are wanting to bring in universal drug care (prescriptions free for everybody under 18 and over 65) in addition to universal dental care.  Fix the one system first and then saddle me with 25% higher taxes so I can pay for somebody's crown and fillings...  >:(

Oh wow, it's gotten worse since those Fraser and Heartland reports I've read.

Very sad to know this is the arc under Trudumb. :(

Gd5150

Quote from: Metron2267 on November 21, 2018, 11:35:36 AM
That's because it was strawman designed to be burnt to the ground and replaced by single payer. Obozo and the Dems lined it all up so the private sector would be the fall guys by rising rates and then in pure Hegelian Dialectic the Feds would swoop in to nationalize and appease the restive peasants.


Just like the demokkkrats who’ve run CA for over 2 decades are doing with PGE and utilities in CA. Burn baby burn.




https://youtu.be/LH-QwK4v0ZI

Metron2267

Quote from: Gd5150 on November 21, 2018, 12:54:59 PM
Just like the demokkkrats who’ve run CA for over 2 decades are doing with PGE and utilities in CA. Burn baby burn.

A sponsored holding company of Rothschild Inc.

:(

ItsOver

Right on, right on, Mr. President!

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/chief-justice-john-roberts-rebuts-trump-obama-judge/story?id=59344259

Roberts, the same swamp rat cuck who was a weasel on Obama care.



WOTR

Quote from: Metron2267 on November 21, 2018, 11:35:36 AM

Very sad to know this is the arc under Trudumb. :(
There is a lot getting worse.  The economy has managed to stay afloat.  However, I would say one more mandate for the man-child and we will be sunk.

Here is a gem from bill C-63.  An employee now has the RIGHT to ask for flexible work (a schedule to suit them or even working from home, or different days of work.)  An employer is now forced to respond in writing and can only refuse it for certain reasons (yes, the list has a number of reasons.)  But the fact that it is now a right for the employee to make their own schedule and work from home unless the employer can show why it will harm their business should tell you how fucked up we have got...

Suddenly I, as the employer no longer have the right to determine was it best for my business.  The employee will be the one to tell me what effect they believe their working from home will have on my business and suggest ways to me to accommodate them.  After that, I need a reason to tell them to go fuck their hat- and need to communicate it in writing.

Just in case you think I'm making this up.  (You wonder why American companies are starting to pull up stakes and run for the boarder when we have a drama teacher writing employment law?)

177.‍1 (1) An employee who has completed six consecutive months of continuous employment with an employer may request from the employer a change to the following terms and conditions of employment:
(a) the number of hours that the employee is required to work;
(b) the employee’s work schedule;
(c) the employee’s location of work; and
(d) any terms and conditions that apply to the employee and that are prescribed by regulation.
Contents of request
(2) The request shall be made in writing and shall include
(a) the employee’s name;
(b) the date on which the request is made;
(c) a description of the change to the terms and conditions of employment that is requested;
(d) the date on which the change would take effect and, if the change is intended to be temporary, the date on which the change would cease to have effect;
(e) an explanation of the effect that, in the employee’s opinion, the requested change would have on the employer and the manner in which, in the employee’s opinion, the employer could manage that effect; and
(f) any information that may be prescribed by regulation.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: WOTR on November 23, 2018, 05:43:44 AM
There is a lot getting worse.  The economy has managed to stay afloat.  However, I would say one more mandate for the man-child and we will be sunk.

Here is a gem from bill C-63.  An employee now has the RIGHT to ask for flexible work (a schedule to suit them or even working from home, or different days of work.)  An employer is now forced to respond in writing and can only refuse it for certain reasons (yes, the list has a number of reasons.)  But the fact that it is now a right for the employee to make their own schedule and work from home unless the employer can show why it will harm their business should tell you how fucked up we have got...

Suddenly I, as the employer no longer have the right to determine was it best for my business.  The employee will be the one to tell me what effect they believe their working from home will have on my business and suggest ways to me to accommodate them.  After that, I need a reason to tell them to go fuck their hat- and need to communicate it in writing.

Just in case you think I'm making this up.  (You wonder why American companies are starting to pull up stakes and run for the boarder when we have a drama teacher writing employment law?)

177.‍1 (1) An employee who has completed six consecutive months of continuous employment with an employer may request from the employer a change to the following terms and conditions of employment:
(a) the number of hours that the employee is required to work;
(b) the employee’s work schedule;
(c) the employee’s location of work; and
(d) any terms and conditions that apply to the employee and that are prescribed by regulation.
Contents of request
(2) The request shall be made in writing and shall include
(a) the employee’s name;
(b) the date on which the request is made;
(c) a description of the change to the terms and conditions of employment that is requested;
(d) the date on which the change would take effect and, if the change is intended to be temporary, the date on which the change would cease to have effect;
(e) an explanation of the effect that, in the employee’s opinion, the requested change would have on the employer and the manner in which, in the employee’s opinion, the employer could manage that effect; and
(f) any information that may be prescribed by regulation.


Metron2267

Quote from: WOTR on November 23, 2018, 05:43:44 AM


Here is a gem from bill C-63.  An employee now has the RIGHT to ask for flexible work (a schedule to suit them or even working from home, or different days of work.)  An employer is now forced to respond in writing and can only refuse it for certain reasons (yes, the list has a number of reasons.) 

I truly had no idea it had gotten that far along. Sounds like Canada has become a proto-millenial state, and seemingly overnight! Of course that's just frog in the hot tub thinking from someone who isn't as informed as to the continuum of norms up there.

I suspect this is just incremental nannying and in many ways brethren to our sanctuary cities lunacy. I wonder how the cultures meshed on the Tim Hortons/BK merger and Oakville tax dodge.




Juan

Jerome Corsi says he is trying to negotiate a plea deal with Mueller. We don’t tend to believe Corsi on anything else, should we believe this?

Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod