BellGab.com Archive

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on December 30, 2018, 08:36:42 PM
I know all about Colby.  If Brennan doesn't get locked up I can live with his doing a dumpster dive.  In any event, he's not going to GITMO.

Why not?

Isn't he a fucking TRAITOR?

https://canadafreepress.com/article/ex-cia-director-john-brennan-proves-once-again-hes-a-traitor

In the most vocal opposition to President Donald Trump yet, former CIA Director John Brennan said that if the White House tries to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, government officials should refuse to follow the president orders, as they would be â€" in his view â€" “inconsistent” with the duties of the executive branch.

“I think it’s the obligation of some executive branch officials to refuse to carry that out. I would just hope that this is not going to be a partisan issue. That Republicans, Democrats are going to see that the future of this government is at stake and something needs to be done for the good of the future,” Brennan told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer at the Aspen Security Forum, effectively calling for a coup against the president should Trump give the order to fire Mueller.

Quote from: ItsOver on December 31, 2018, 08:53:43 AM
Damn right.  I'm an American citizen.  There's no such thing as a "citizen of the world."  :  I'm sure Soros and his ilk would prefer us being slaves of their glorious NWO. 

Amen brother, A-freaking-men!

I'll be damned if my progeny are expected to kow tow to international treaties to do the UN's bidding and feed the Euro banksters' international war machine. America for Americans! Period.

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on December 31, 2018, 08:37:39 AM
We are talking about pulling about 2,000 SPEC OPS troops out of Syria.   Our Arab allies should be able to take up the slack in terms of boots on the ground and $$$.  I do worry that the Kurds will left to the tender mercies of the Turks.  They have been the only anti regime group that we have backed that can be consistently depended on.  If it ends badly for them, it will be another U.S. betrayal like that of the Hmungs and other pro U.S. ethnic/religious groups in Vietnam.

So how many corners of the world are we supposed to save from their own eons old internal feuds?

Have we solved any yet, even one?

Do you truly believe in the mission of Team America, Global Cop?

Thanks for the globalist daily drivel, but I say PASS!

Quote from: Gd5150 on December 30, 2018, 10:47:54 PM
What Che Metron considers a sound argument.

Got a clue how pervasive it is?

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on December 30, 2018, 08:36:42 PM
I know all about Colby.  If Brennan doesn't get locked up I can live with his doing a dumpster dive.  In any event, he's not going to GITMO.

And whose insider loop are you in?

No wonder you went mental when Bush's illuminati resume got cited.

Huh...

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on December 30, 2018, 06:58:12 PM
Get back to me when John Brennan takes up residence in GITMO.

You a Brennan fan?

Wow.

Nice covert op you had going here.

Over.

I thought so, hard to tell with my access now being only the zoo.

Quote from: username on December 30, 2018, 05:42:28 PM
Lies

Oh, was Jackstar the first then?

Quote from: Jackstar on December 30, 2018, 06:24:04 PM
Are you really frontin' like this shit ain't happening? That's adorable.

Masks dropping off here...

https://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/the-frightening-third-purpose-of-jade-helm/
The Third Purpose

When the aerial assets of Pope AFB were moved, I became suspicious that Jade Helm was ultimately serving a larger purpose.

Most journalists, who have followed the horrific details of Jade Helm know that Jade Helm will eliminate all resistance to World War III. Now we are seeing the prepositioning of military assets under the guise of Jade Helm for the purpose of fighting World War III which is a war of survival for the Federal Reserve and the Petrodollar. In actuality, this world war will be a war of depopulation and planetary unification and will be fought for the Rotschild banking interests in Basil.

At the end of the day the Federal Reserve and the other central banks will lie in ruin as the march towards the seemingly inevitable conclusion of a one-world government comes into being.

Finally, the U.S. has been set up to lose World War III and I have documented this to a fault. The focus for each American should become individual preparation, both physical and spiritual.

https://buchanan.org/blog/pjb-george-w-bush-globalist-867
George W. Bush, Globalist
Friday - October 12, 2007 at 1:01 am
4.17 Stars!
Share Pat's Columns!
by Patrick J. Buchanan

Have the Bush Republicans ceased to be reliable custodians of American sovereignty? So it would seem.

President George W. Bush began well. He rejected the Kyoto Protocol on global warming negotiated by Vice President Al Gore as both injurious to the economy and rooted in questionable science. He refused to allow the armed forces and diplomats of the United States to be brought under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

But now President Bush is about to take his country by the hand and make a great leap forward into world government. He has signed on to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, or the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), which transfers jurisdiction over the Atlantic, Pacific, Indian and Arctic oceans and all the oil and mineral resources they contain to an International Seabed Authority. This second United Nations would be ceded eternal hegemony over two-thirds of the Earth. It is the greatest U.N. power grab in history and, thanks to George Bush, is about to succeed.

Within the Authority, consisting of 155 nations, America would have one vote and no veto. However, we would pay the principal share of the operating costs, as we do today of the United Nations.

In 1978, Ronald Reagan declared, “No national interest of the United States can justify handing sovereign control of two-thirds of the Earth’s surface over to the Third World.”

Rejecting the New International Economic Order that sought to effect a historic transfer of wealth and power from the First World to the Third, President Reagan in 1982 refused to sign the Law of the Sea Treaty or send it to the Senate. Now, Bush, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., have resurrected this monstrosity and are about to ram it through the U.S. Senate with, if you can believe it, the support of the U.S. Navy.

The rot of globalism runs deep in this capital city.

What is the matter with Bush? What is the matter with the U.S. Navy? For the sea treaty grants us no rights we do not already have in international law and tradition â€" it only codifies them. It siphons off national rights, national sovereignty and national wealth, however, and empowers global bureaucrats and Third World kleptocrats whose common trait is jealousy of and hostility toward the United States.

Under LOST, if the United States wishes to mine the ocean or scoop up minerals from its floor, we would have to pay a fee and get permission from the Authority, then provide a subsidiary of the Authority called the Enterprise with a comparable site for its own exploitation with our technology. Eventually, the Authority would collect 7 percent of the revenue from the U.S. mining site, giving this institution of world government what the United Nations has hungered for for decades: the power to tax nations.

While the treaty assures the right of peaceful passage on the high seas and through narrows that are territorial waters, we already have that right under international law. And for the past two centuries, we have had as guarantor of the right of free passage the U.S. Navy. Now, we will have it courtesy of the International Seabed Authority.

“It is inconceivable to this naval officer,” writes Adm. James Lyons, former commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific, “why the Senate would willingly want to forfeit its responsibility for America’s freedom of the seas to the unelected and unaccountable international agency that would be created by the ratification of LOST.

“The power of the U.S. Navy, not some anonymous bureaucracy, has been the nation’s guarantee to our access to and freedom of the seas. I can cite many maritime operations â€" from the blockade of Cuba in 1962, to the reflagging of ships in the Persian Gulf, to our submarine intelligence-gathering programs â€" that have been critical to maintaining our freedom of the seas and protecting our waters from encroachment. All those examples would likely have to be submitted to an international tribunal for approval if we become a signatory to this treaty. … This is incomprehensible.”

U.S. warships today inspect vessels suspected of carrying nuclear contraband. In the Cold War, U.S. submarines entered harbors to tap into communications cables to protect our national security. Our subs routinely transit straits submerged. To do this, post-LOST, the Navy would have to get permission from an Authority composed of states most of which have an almost unbroken record of voting against us in the United Nations.

Why are we doing this? Do we think we will win the approbation of the international community if we show ourselves to be good global citizens by surrendering our rights and our wealth?

The Law of the Sea Treaty is an utterly unnecessary transfer of authority from the United States and of the wealth of its citizens to global bureaucrats who have never had our interests at heart, and to Third World regimes that have never been reliable friends. That Republicans senators think this is a good idea speaks volumes about what has become of the party of T.R., Bob Taft, Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan.

And they call themselves conservatives.

Share Pat's Columns!

Quote from: Gd5150 on December 30, 2018, 06:05:07 PM
No shit. So was Gaddafi. But apparently to you he’s a hero now.

Why would he be a hero to me?

Did I say he is a hero?

Or did I say he was right about Muzzie hordes invading Yurop?

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on December 30, 2018, 05:44:58 PM
I have just two words for you:  JADE HELM

Sorry, FEMA summer camp ain't so much fun.

Try these 3 words - New Madrid fault.

Quote from: Gd5150 on December 30, 2018, 05:48:36 PM

And?

Was he right? Did Merkel fill Germany with filthy muzzie invaders?

Discuss.

Quote from: Gd5150 on December 30, 2018, 05:43:18 PM
Debate what? That everyone are globalist faggots? You win.

Who said "everyone"?

Not me.

Next strawman please.

Quote from: Gd5150 on December 30, 2018, 05:59:55 PM
Leghumper

I do to:

Quote from: Gd5150 on December 30, 2018, 05:50:22 PM
This is your friend Che Metron. Better put a leash on him or you’ll be as big of a joke as he is soon enough.

Interesting how you've completely turned in such a short period of time. Very interesting.

Che was a narcissistic pawn and of course a Godless commie.

But keep on straw-manning, you only diminish your own political credibility here.

Quote from: username on December 30, 2018, 03:45:53 PM
Top 10 list.

10. Bill Clinton

9. Kevin Spacey

8. Bill Cosby

7. Pete Davidson

6. Dan blankeship

5. Tina Turner

4.  Artie Lange

3. Bernie Sanders

2. Hillary Clinton

1. Pope Francis

I'll byte...top 10 in what? :

So why is it you can't take him out in debate?

Should be a cake walk...

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on December 30, 2018, 05:31:04 PM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_Naval_Base

You always whip out a wiki url when your pathetic excuse for an intellect is challenged.

QuoteOkay, they're building a new barracks.

For whom?

QuoteStop the fucking presses.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/guantanamo/article213231219.html
Guantánamo today has 40 prisoners and a staff of 1,800 troops and civilians. With the maximum-security Camp 5 prison just reopened, after a cellblock was remade into a clinic and mental health ward, the detention center can now take in another 40 men.

Any new prisoner would be the first to arrive at Guantánamo since the CIA delivered an Afghan "high-value detainee" in March 2008.
[/b]
Bend double and blow yourself, globalist vermin!

Quote from: Gd5150 on December 30, 2018, 05:17:54 PM
So now Gaddafi was a hero? A freedom fighter?

Neither. Why do you ask?

QuoteThe 3 amigos are getting dumber by the minute. Time to lay off the Alex Jones boys.

Uh, I didn't find that meme on Alex' site, try again.

QuoteWe got you freedom fighters T-shirt’s to wear while you fight the evil globalists everywhere. I have 3 shirts, 1 for the each of ya.

Globalism (by definition and implementation) = TREASON!

Very disappointed to see you laughing along with the the Soros' funded assault on America's national sovereignty. Strikes me as childish and self-defeating really, oh and Bush (either one) are globalists.

Quote from: Kidnostad3 on December 30, 2018, 03:52:42 PM
Is there a point to this post?

Are you unaware that Gitmo is up-staffing and building out?

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/03/28/when-it-comes-guantanamo-trump-truly-builder-chief.html

MIAMI -- The Trump administration has more than $200 million in new construction teed up for Guantanamo this year and next, combining new funding in the $1.3 trillion spending bill and existing projects.

The biggest ticket item for the U.S. Navy base in Cuba in the so-called Omnibus Spending law is $115 million for a new 848-troop barracks across the street from the McDonald's and commissary to consolidate enlisted prison staff under one roof.

A dive into the documents that underpin the spending bill that President Donald Trump signed Friday -- declaring "Nobody read it. It's only hours old. Some people don't even know what's in it" -- indicates Congress did not fund a new $69 million prison for the 15 high-value detainees at Guantanamo, called Camp 7. It does however devote $66 million to a 150-prisoner jail, with campus, at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state for troops and airmen accused of crimes.


https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/guantanamo/article213231219.html
Guantánamo today has 40 prisoners and a staff of 1,800 troops and civilians. With the maximum-security Camp 5 prison just reopened, after a cellblock was remade into a clinic and mental health ward, the detention center can now take in another 40 men.

Any new prisoner would be the first to arrive at Guantánamo since the CIA delivered an Afghan "high-value detainee" in March 2008.