• Welcome to BellGab.com Archive.
 

Ask Jackstar Anything

Started by Jackstar, October 08, 2018, 11:47:27 PM

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: Metron2267 on January 30, 2019, 08:27:11 PM
Control freaks - same reason Dems want fascism. But as an Obummer voter you already know that. :(

Your a faggot so you only know sucking dicks and trying to fellate every Bellgab member.





Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 30, 2019, 08:14:55 PM
The Beatles, as great as they were, were a Tavistock Institute psyop to sell the world on communism.

You are completely fucked in the head, not to mention the ass.

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 30, 2019, 08:14:55 PM
But do tell us, what do those lyrics mean to you? ???

It's tempting to shut your eyes to the harsh reality around you and create your own imaginary world.  The complexity of life is simplified; there's less stress and uncertainty.  Everything you experience is funneled through that construct, and because it has to fit within it, ends up being distorted and misunderstood.  It can be a challenge to escape reality in this way, because it distances you from those around you, at some emotional cost.  But in the end it doesn't matter, because the comfort of your place in the imaginary world beckons.

That to me sums up the appeal of the conspiracy retard persona.  Take that persona, crank up all the knobs to 10, make all motion to be spastic diplegia, and you have a Jackster.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 08:47:41 PM
You are completely fucked in the head, not to mention the ass.

It's tempting to shut your eyes to the harsh reality around you and create your own imaginary world.  The complexity of life is simplified; there's less stress and uncertainty.  Everything you experience is funneled through that construct, and because it has to fit within it, ends up being distorted and misunderstood.  It can be a challenge to escape reality in this way, because it distances you from those around you, at some emotional cost.  But in the end it doesn't matter, because the comfort of your place in the imaginary world beckons.

That to me sums up the appeal of the conspiracy retard persona.  Take that persona, crank up all the knobs to 10, make all motion to be spastic diplegia, and you have a Jackster.

Here’s a harsh reality I bet you wish you could escape from:

Lennon stated: "'Imagine', which says: 'Imagine that there was no more religion, no more country, no more politics,' is virtually the Communist Manifesto...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagine_(John_Lennon_song)

Jackstar

 [attachment=1]

[attachment=2]

[attachment=3]

[attachment=4]


Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 08:22:42 PM
Just an ordinary Joe who can think and reason. 

Bro, don't sell yourself short--you're extra ordinary.

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 30, 2019, 08:54:17 PM
Here’s a harsh reality I bet you wish you could escape from:

Lennon stated: "'Imagine', which says: 'Imagine that there was no more religion, no more country, no more politics,' is virtually the Communist Manifesto...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagine_(John_Lennon_song)

That's not the only interpretation of that line.  Meaning, it is not dispositive.

Take the cock out of your mouth and give me your interpretation of these lines, also penned by John Lennon:

But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
You ain't gonna make it with anyone, anyhow

Also, here's the rest of the quote that you cropped from Wikipedia:

"...even though I'm not particularly a Communist and I do not belong to any movement."[6] He told NME: "There is no real Communist state in the world; you must realize that. The Socialism I speak about ... [is] not the way some daft Russian might do it, or the Chinese might do it. That might suit them. Us, we should have a nice ... British Socialism."[6] Ono described the lyrical statement of "Imagine" as "just what John believed: that we are all one country, one world, one people."[8] Rolling Stone described its lyrics as "22 lines of graceful, plain-spoken faith in the power of a world, united in purpose, to repair and change itself".[8][nb 1] Atheist author Richard Dawkins embraced it as an "atheist anthem".[10] Lennon himself stated that his song "did not discourage faith".[11]"

The quote, in its entirety, says something completely different than what YOU wanted it to say, so you dishonestly took a piece out of context to support your fantasy world.

Always remember, folks: TROOFERS LIE

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 09:08:43 PM
That's not the only interpretation of that line.  Meaning, it is not dispositive.

Take the cock out of your mouth and give me your interpretation of these lines, also penned by John Lennon:

But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
You ain't gonna make it with anyone, anyhow

Also, here's the rest of the quote that you cropped from Wikipedia:

"...even though I'm not particularly a Communist and I do not belong to any movement."[6] He told NME: "There is no real Communist state in the world; you must realize that. The Socialism I speak about ... [is] not the way some daft Russian might do it, or the Chinese might do it. That might suit them. Us, we should have a nice ... British Socialism."[6] Ono described the lyrical statement of "Imagine" as "just what John believed: that we are all one country, one world, one people."[8] Rolling Stone described its lyrics as "22 lines of graceful, plain-spoken faith in the power of a world, united in purpose, to repair and change itself".[8][nb 1] Atheist author Richard Dawkins embraced it as an "atheist anthem".[10] Lennon himself stated that his song "did not discourage faith".[11]"

Yeah...sure...I wrote this anthem about worlwide communism...but I’m not really for it. Maybe try taking Lennon’s cock out of your mouth cuz that shit’s all doublespeak. ;D

Quote from: Jackstar on January 30, 2019, 09:02:50 PM
[attachment=4,msg1311098]

"Stubblebine became a proponent of psychic warfare and initiated a project within the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), which he commanded from 1981 to 1984, to create "a breed of 'super soldier'" who would "have the ability to become invisible at will and to walk through walls". He attempted to walk through walls himself[3][4] â€" but failed, as he himself described in a 2004 interview.[5] (These activities feature prominently in Jon Ronson's 2004 book The Men Who Stare at Goats.[6][7])

A key sponsor of the Stargate Project (a remote viewing project) at Fort Meade, Maryland, Stubblebine was convinced of the reality of a wide variety of psychic phenomena. He required that all of his battalion commanders learn how to bend spoons in the manner of celebrity psychic Uri Geller, and he himself attempted several psychic feats, in addition to walking through walls, such as levitation and dispersing distant clouds with his mind. Stubblebine was a key leader in the U.S. military invasion of Grenada (1983) and was, according to a report published by the Daily Mail, "at the heart of America's military machine" at that time.[4] After some controversy involving the experiments with psychic phenomena, Stubblebine took "early retirement" from the Army in 1984."

https://americanloons.blogspot.com/2013/01/378-albert-stubblebine-rima-laibow.html

Nuttier than a squirrel turd.

Next!

Also: the troofer org that fabricated the above quotes, attributed to him, LIED.  He did NOT witness the attack on the Pentagon.

Always remember, folks:  TROOFERS LIE


Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 09:19:18 PM
dispersing distant clouds with his mind

I've actually done this one myself. You're a complete idiot.

Quote from: Jackstar on January 30, 2019, 09:20:40 PM
I've actually done this one myself. You're a complete idiot.

Goes against the laws of physics, but that's okay.  Enjoy your fantasy world.  So much easier than reality.

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 09:29:01 PM
Goes against the laws of physics

That doesn't seem to be a problem for you to accept two hundred-story buildings collapsing into their own footprints within 10 seconds, now does it? Do you use a handtruck to move those goalposts, or what?

Quote from: Jackstar on January 30, 2019, 09:29:53 PM
That doesn't seem to be a problem for you to accept two hundred-story buildings collapsing into their own footprints within 10 seconds, now does it? Do you use a handtruck to move those goalposts, or what?

Moving something with your mind is a violation of the laws of physics on the face of it.  It requires no analysis or reasoned debate.

That the collapse of the towers is a violation of physics is limited to the world of troofers, who are marginalized group of paranoid retards.  It is not in any way conclusive except to that group, who are pathological liars as demonstrated repeatedly in every forum they inhabit, including Bellgab.  For example, you just lied when you said that the towers collapsed into their own footprints.  That is indisputably a lie.  It is easily disproven by pictures and videos of the collapse, not to mention the total loss of the rest of the WTC complex.

You also lied when you said that the towers collapsed within 10 seconds.  This too is an indisputable lie.

Always remember, folks: TROOFERS LIE

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 09:46:42 PM
Moving something with your mind is a violation of the laws of physics

That's really just your opinion. What about temperature? Here, explain this phenomenon:




pro tip: You can't.

Jackstar

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 09:46:42 PM
For example, you just lied when you said

[attachment=1]


dismissive hand-waving gestures

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 09:08:43 PM
Always remember, folks: TROOFERS LIE

Always remember, folks: People who use the term troofers are gay. It’s pure faggory, plain and simple.

Quote from: Jackstar on January 30, 2019, 10:04:01 PM
That's really just your opinion. What about temperature? Here, explain this phenomenon:




pro tip: You can't.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[pausing to take a deep breath]

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAhahahahahahahahahahaha

The simple answer (for your benefit) is that it's an example of heat transfer converted to mechanical motion.  Isn't it in the wikipedia article?  You are a titanic moron.

Quote from: Jackstar on January 30, 2019, 09:20:40 PM
I've actually done this one myself. You're a complete idiot.

I'm still laughing at this one.  When someone drops something, do you also "will" it with your mind to hit the floor? 

I'll bet that cloud would still be there if it wasn't for you.  After all, clouds never disappear on their own.  Water vapor in the air never changes location or temperature.  HHAHAHAHAHhahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHHahahhahahHHAHAHHAHA

The Cleveland Browns were like at 2 million to one to win the Super Bowl this year.  With your ability to move the ball into or out of the hands of receivers, you could have made bank.  You could be a jillionaire and move out of your parents garage.  Instead, you will celebrate your 44th birthday there with a bottle of lube and a bottle of bourbon, watching clips of Loose Change and partying until one or the other bottle is empty.

Goddamn this is comedy gold.  This is side-spittingly hilarious.  Don't ever change, Jack.  Woo hoo hah

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 30, 2019, 10:43:35 PM
Always remember, folks: People who use the term troofers are gay. It’s pure faggory, plain and simple.

I'm sorry that providing concrete, incontestable examples of how troofers cannot help themselves from lying is getting your MAGA panties in a bunch.

Actually, no, I am not sorry at all.  Lovin every minute of it.

Always remember, folks: TROOFERS LIE

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 09:29:01 PM
Goes against the laws of physics, but that's okay.  Enjoy your fantasy world.  So much easier than reality.

^^^^^^^^^^
Refuses to accept that the official 9/11 goes against the laws of physics but will use the same laws of physics to score points on Bellgab. Priorities! ;D

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 30, 2019, 11:41:54 PM
the official 9/11 goes against the laws of physics

Nope, it doesn't.  Try again.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 30, 2019, 11:54:56 PM
Nope, it doesn't.  Try again.

Newton’s 3rd law says buildings can’t naturally collapse like that. Maybe you should try again...but I really just expect a hissy fit from you in lieu of facts and reasoning.

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 30, 2019, 11:57:16 PM
Newton’s 3rd law says buildings can’t naturally collapse like that.

Unsupported claim is unsupported.  The troofer way is not the proofer way.  Always.

Newton's 3rd law does not prevent a building from collapsing.  How fucking stupid are you, anyway?  No building can collapse because of Newton's 3rd law?  Explain Newton's 3rd law in your own words and give some practical examples.  Not something you cut and pasted from the Internet.  You can't, can you?

Fucksplosion of links to troofer websites coming in 5...4...3...

You:

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 12:27:28 AM
Unsupported claim is unsupported.  The troofer way is not the proofer way.  Always.

Newton's 3rd law does not prevent a building from collapsing.  How fucking stupid are you, anyway?  No building can collapse because of Newton's 3rd law?  Explain Newton's 3rd law in your own words and give some practical examples.  Not something you cut and pasted from the Internet.  You can't, can you?

Fucksplosion of links to troofer websites coming in 5...4...3...

You:


Like I said, hissy fit. I didn’t say it wouldn’t prevent it from collapsing, I said it dictates that it would never have collapsed like that because for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Therefore, the push back from the building below the top floors would’ve prevented a complete and total collapse the way the building would if it were professionally demolished, like it was. So, I guess the only question remaining is just how stupid are you? I’m guessing very. :D

Always remember, the people who use the term troofers are totally gay. ;D

Quote from: Dr. MD MD on January 31, 2019, 01:34:08 AM
I didn’t say it wouldn’t prevent it from collapsing, I said it dictates that it would never have collapsed like that because for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Therefore, the push back from the building below the top floors would’ve prevented a complete and total collapse the way the building would if it were professionally demolished, like it was.

Note to Stupid:

As usual for a troofer, you respond to any request for support of your opinion by restating your opinion in greater detail.  In this case, you read the tl;dr version of the Third Law and think that you can simply keep repeating "the 3rd law wouldn't allow it" as support, which it is not.

The 3rd law states, in a conceptual sense, that all forces between two objects exist in equal magnitude and opposite direction.  We are talking here about two objects that can sustain the forces.  For example, suppose that you, Dr. Cornhole Cockgargler, are sitting on a chair near your favorite glory hole waiting for a cock to hang through it.  Your butt exerts a downward force on the chair, due to gravity, and the chair exerts an equal and opposite force on your butt, leaving them in equilibrium.  Likewise, the chair exerts a somewhat greater force on the floor, and the floor exerts an equal and opposite force on the chair.  The force by your butt is the "action," and the force by the chair is the "reaction."  The chair transmits the force of your butt to the floor because it has the structural integrity to do so.  If you weighed 400 lbs like Senda, maybe not.  The chair collapses, and then it would be your body laying in a puddle of semen that would exert a force on the floor, which would exert and equal and opposite force on your body.

In the case of the WTC, the towers exerted a force in the direction of the ground, and the ground exerted an equal and opposite amount of force in the opposite direction.

Once the structural integrity of a tower was compromised, the amount of force in the direction of the ground was momentarily reduced (as was the opposing force by the ground), as the upper section of the tower was no longer fully supported by the section below it.  It began to move, converting potential energy into kinetic energy.  The force of the upper section slamming into the next floor immediately below it was at least ten times the design specification.  Under those conditions, that floor gave way.  The kinetic energy was only higher by the time it encountered the next floor down, and the next, and so forth.  More complicated than the chair example, but fundamentally the same.  This process continued until the upper section no longer had any floors to collapse, and was basically pushing against the Earth.  At that point, the collapse reversed direction.  The floor closest to the ground collapsed, and as the upper section continued to move, the next lowest floor and the next etc collapsed.

You are an ignorant fuckhead that is barely aware that he is alive, so I am sure that all of this sailed over your head.  Just stick with your troofer bullshit.  Life will be easier for you that way.

Dr. MD MD

Quote from: DigitalPigSnuggler on January 31, 2019, 03:56:22 AM
Note to Stupid:

As usual for a troofer, you respond to any request for support of your opinion by restating your opinion in greater detail.  In this case, you read the tl;dr version of the Third Law and think that you can simply keep repeating "the 3rd law wouldn't allow it" as support, which it is not.

The 3rd law states, in a conceptual sense, that all forces between two objects exist in equal magnitude and opposite direction.  We are talking here about two objects that can sustain the forces.  For example, suppose that you, Dr. Cornhole Cockgargler, are sitting on a chair near your favorite glory hole waiting for a cock to hang through it.  Your butt exerts a downward force on the chair, due to gravity, and the chair exerts an equal and opposite force on your butt, leaving them in equilibrium.  Likewise, the chair exerts a somewhat greater force on the floor, and the floor exerts an equal and opposite force on the chair.  The force by your butt is the "action," and the force by the chair is the "reaction."  The chair transmits the force of your butt to the floor because it has the structural integrity to do so.  If you weighed 400 lbs like Senda, maybe not.  The chair collapses, and then it would be your body laying in a puddle of semen that would exert a force on the floor, which would exert and equal and opposite force on your body.

In the case of the WTC, the towers exerted a force in the direction of the ground, and the ground exerted an equal and opposite amount of force in the opposite direction.

Once the structural integrity of a tower was compromised, the amount of force in the direction of the ground was momentarily reduced (as was the opposing force by the ground), as the upper section of the tower was no longer fully supported by the section below it.  It began to move, converting potential energy into kinetic energy.  The force of the upper section slamming into the next floor immediately below it was at least ten times the design specification.  Under those conditions, that floor gave way.  The kinetic energy was only higher by the time it encountered the next floor down, and the next, and so forth.  More complicated than the chair example, but fundamentally the same.  This process continued until the upper section no longer had any floors to collapse, and was basically pushing against the Earth.  At that point, the collapse reversed direction.  The floor closest to the ground collapsed, and as the upper section continued to move, the next lowest floor and the next etc collapsed.

You are an ignorant fuckhead that is barely aware that he is alive, so I am sure that all of this sailed over your head.  Just stick with your troofer bullshit.  Life will be easier for you that way.

And you think that by ignoring the laws of physics in this one example you’ll win the argument. You don’t. It’s complete bullshit and you know it. Newton’s third law would dictate that although a collapse would’ve occured it wouldn’t have been complete and total and would’ve been eventually stopped by the force pushing back from underneath. Throwing another hissy fit isn’t going to change any of that...ever. It just makes you look like the pathetic, establishment-serving chump that you are. Just more proof that people who use the term troofers are totally gay. :D


Powered by SMFPacks Menu Editor Mod